Prolong the flushing and locking interval of TIVAD is feasible in COVID-19: An overview of systematic reviews

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Zhao, Jian [1 ]
Wan, Guang-ming [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, RN Sch Nursing, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Chest Hosp, RN Dept Emergency, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Flushing interval; TIVAD; overview; COVID-19; cancer; VENOUS ACCESS PORTS; NORMAL SALINE; COMPLICATIONS; MAINTENANCE; HEPARIN; DEVICES; CARE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1177/11297298221086129
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
The aim of the overview was to synthesize existing systematic reviews (SRs) of flushing interval for patients who inserted totally implanted venous catheter devices (TIVAD). Regular flushing is indispensable for catheter patency, the recommended flushing interval of TIVAD is 4 weeks, however, there is an argument for prolonging the maintenance interval, which has been proved by many SRs. However, the flushing interval range from 4-week to 3-month. The discrepancy in maintenance period could puzzle health professionals and hinder best practice into the clinic. So, we performed the overview by following the PRISMA statement. The PubMed, Ovid, Wan Fang database, Web of Science, CINAHL, CNKI, EMBASE, Cochrane Library were searched from inception to November 2021. The AMSTAR-2, the PRISMA statement, and ROBIS tool were used to assess SRs' method, report quality, and risk of bias, respectively. Then all results were synthesized, the quality of SRs' results was evaluated with GRADE. Finally, five SRs were included. However, non-randomized and small sample size of original studies result in the limitation of SRs. The evidence grade of conclusions is low, bias of mixed factors in included studies, further large sample sizes, RCTs need to be conducted in the future. Prolonged flushing interval was feasible based on the recent evidence, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic because the overwhelming healthcare system and inconvenience of transportation made maintenance not as easy as it used to be. There is no difference of complication between prolonged flushing interval (> 4-week) and 4-week period, and it can also reduce healthcare cost with no harm to patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1259
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: an overview of systematic reviews
    Borges do Nascimento, Israel Junior
    O'Mathuna, Donal P.
    von Groote, Thilo Caspar
    Abdulazeem, Hebatullah Mohamed
    Weerasekara, Ishanka
    Marusic, Ana
    Puljak, Livia
    Civile, Vinicius Tassoni
    Zakarija-Grkovic, Irena
    Pericic, Tina Poklepovic
    Atallah, Alvaro Nagib
    Filoso, Santino
    Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
    Marcolino, Milena Soriano
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [2] Safety and Efficacy of Convalescent Plasma in COVID-19: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Franchini, Massimo
    Corsini, Fabiana
    Focosi, Daniele
    Cruciani, Mario
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (09)
  • [3] Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: an overview of systematic reviews
    Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento
    Dónal P. O’Mathúna
    Thilo Caspar von Groote
    Hebatullah Mohamed Abdulazeem
    Ishanka Weerasekara
    Ana Marusic
    Livia Puljak
    Vinicius Tassoni Civile
    Irena Zakarija-Grkovic
    Tina Poklepovic Pericic
    Alvaro Nagib Atallah
    Santino Filoso
    Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
    Milena Soriano Marcolino
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 21
  • [4] COVID-19 vaccine response and safety in patients with cancer: An overview of systematic reviews
    Sun, Hong
    Bu, Fengjiao
    Li, Ling
    Zhang, Xiuwen
    Yan, Jingchao
    Huang, Taomin
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [5] School closures during COVID-19: an overview of systematic reviews
    Hume, Samuel
    Brown, Samuel Robert
    Mahtani, Kamal Ram
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2023, 28 (03) : 164 - 174
  • [6] Is it feasible to prolong the flushing interval for totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs)? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Lei
    Liang, Junli
    Liu, Zhanlun
    Jin, Yinghui
    Ma, Cuicui
    Zhao, Xiaoyan
    Qin, Mingyi
    Wei, Jinwei
    Li, Xinsheng
    Xie, Yanli
    Liu, Fengxia
    Li, Laiyou
    Wang, Jianxin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 30 (01) : 40 - 50
  • [7] The reporting completeness and transparency of systematic reviews of prognostic prediction models for COVID-19 was poor: a methodological overview of systematic reviews
    Talimtzi, Persefoni
    Ntolkeras, Antonios
    Kostopoulos, Georgios
    Bougioukas, Konstantinos I.
    Pagkalidou, Eirini
    Ouranidis, Andreas
    Pataka, Athanasia
    Haidich, Anna -Bettina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 167
  • [8] Maternal and Neonatal Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 in Pregnancy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Papapanou, Michail
    Papaioannou, Maria
    Petta, Aikaterini
    Routsi, Eleni
    Farmaki, Maria
    Vlahos, Nikolaos
    Siristatidis, Charalampos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (02) : 1 - 20
  • [9] Clinical manifestations of COVID-19: An overview of 102 systematic reviews with evidence mapping
    Luo, Xufei
    Lv, Meng
    Zhang, Xianzhuo
    Estill, Janne
    Yang, Bo
    Lei, Ruobing
    Ren, Mengjuan
    Liu, Yunlan
    Wang, Ling
    Liu, Xiao
    Wang, Qi
    Meng, Min
    Chen, Yaolong
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, 2022, 15 (03) : 201 - 215
  • [10] Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) interventions for COVID-19: An overview of systematic reviews
    Jeon, Sae-Rom
    Kang, Jung Won
    Ang, Lin
    Lee, Hye Won
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Kim, Tae-Hun
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (03)