共 30 条
Do Magnets Have the Potential to Serve as a Stabilizer for the Shoulder Joint in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears?: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study
被引:0
作者:
Jeon, Yoon Sang
[1
,4
]
Ko, Sang Hyun
[1
]
Jeon, Yun Moon
[1
]
Ryu, Dong Jin
[1
]
Kim, Jeong Seok
[1
]
Park, Hyun Soon
[2
]
Chung, Min-Shik
[3
]
Kwak, Daniel
[3
]
McGarry, Michelle H.
[3
]
Lee, Thay Q.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Inha Univ, Inha Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Inha Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Incheon, South Korea
[3] Congress Med Fdn, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] Inha Univ, Inha Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, 27 Inhang Ro, Incheon 22332, South Korea
基金:
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词:
Massive rotator cuff tear;
Anatomical shoulder arthroplasty;
Magnet;
Stabilization;
Biomechanics;
SUPERIOR CAPSULE RECONSTRUCTION;
PROSTHESIS;
ARTHRITIS;
OUTCOMES;
D O I:
10.4055/cios22397
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Disruption of the rotator cuff muscles compromises concavity compression force, which leads to superior migration of the humeral head and loss of stability. A novel idea of using the magnetic force to achieve shoulder stabilization in massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) was considered because the magnets can stabilize two separate entities with an attraction force. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical effect of the magnetic force on shoulder stabilization in MRCTs.Methods: Seven fresh frozen cadaveric specimens were used with a customized shoulder testing system. Three testing conditions were set up: condition 1, intact rotator cuff without magnets; condition 2, an MRCT without magnets; condition 3, an MRCT with magnets. For each condition, anterior-posterior translation, superior translation, superior migration, and subacromial contact pressure were measured at 0 & DEG;, 30 & DEG;, and 60 & DEG; of abduction. The abduction capability of condition 2 was compared with that of condition 3.Results: The anterior-posterior and superior translations increased in condition 2; however, they decreased compared to condition 2 when the magnets were applied (condition 3) in multiple test positions and loadings (p < 0.05). Abduction capability improved significantly in condition 3 compared with that in condition 2, even for less deltoid loading (p < 0.05).Conclusions: The magnet biomechanically played a positive role in stabilizing the shoulder joint and enabled abduction with less deltoid force in MRCTs. However, to ensure that the magnet is clinically applicable as a stabilizer for the shoulder joint, it is necessary to thoroughly verify its safety in the human body and to conduct further research on technical challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 626
页数:11
相关论文