Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) Usage in Early Building Design Stages: Review of Effects on the Environmental Life Cycle of a Multi-Residential Building

被引:1
作者
Pichette, Gabrielle [1 ]
Blanchet, Pierre [1 ]
Essoua, Gatien Geraud Essoua [2 ]
Breton, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Laval Univ, NSERC Ind Res Chair Ecoresponsible Wood Construct, Dept Wood & Forest Sci, 2425 Terrasse St, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[2] Vertima, 604 St Viateur, Quebec City, PQ G2L 2K8, Canada
来源
BIORESOURCES | 2023年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
Embodied impact; Product category rules (PCR); Building information modeling (BIM); Whole building life cycle assessment (WBLCA); Wood-based structures; LEED(R); ENERGY; SECTOR;
D O I
10.15376/biores.18.4.8134-8150
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS [轻工业、手工业、生活服务业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0822 ;
摘要
The building sector has seen recent growth in the number of published data of construction materials, which can help building practitioners prioritize products with lower environmental impacts. However, EPDs rely on varying assumptions within their life cycle assessment (LCA). This study aimed to evaluate the use of EPDs as a data source instead of a generic data source and its effect on the life cycle impacts of a multiresidential building. This study focused on 19 North American EPDs of structural wood products. The impact assessment results found in the EPDs were compared to the Ecoinvent V3.8 database. The findings of the present study suggest that EPDs can generally be used without distinction compared to the data in the Ecoinvent V3.8 database. However, a few data were found to be outliers. In addition, EPDs of structural wood products only disclosed its manufacturing stage. Other life cycle stages, such as transport of the construction product, can have a significant impact on the building's LCA. Therefore, using EPDs to assess building impacts is recommended over their direct comparison for practitioners to make more comprehensive decisions towards embodied impacts of buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:8134 / 8150
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Promoting sustainability in Mexico's building sector via environmental product declarations [J].
Alberto Arvizu-Pina, Victor ;
Cuchi Burgos, Albert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (11) :1744-1759
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, EN 15804:2012+A1:2013
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EMCDDA-Europol 2016 Annual Report on the Implementation of Council Decision 2005/387/JHA, P1, DOI [10.2800/51444, DOI 10.2800/51444]
[4]  
Athena Institute, 2018, Brock Commons Tallwood House.
[5]  
Athena Institute, 2002, Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Effects for Building Envelope Materials.
[6]  
Azari R., 2019, Sustainable construction technologies, P123, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-811749-1.00004-3, 10.1016/B978-0-12-811749-1.00004-3]
[7]   Life cycle assessment of the building industry: An overview of two decades of research (1995-2018) [J].
Bahramian, Majid ;
Yetilmezsoy, Kaan .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 219
[8]   EPD - ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATIONS FOR WOOD PRODUCTS-AN APPLICATION OF LIFE CYCLE INFORMATION ABOUT FOREST PRODUCTS [J].
Bergman, Richard ;
Taylor, Adam .
FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2011, 61 (03) :192-201
[9]   An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildings [J].
Bernardi, Elena ;
Carlucci, Salvatore ;
Cornaro, Cristina ;
Bohne, Rolf Andre .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (07)
[10]   Environmental Product Declarations: Use in the Architectural and Engineering Design Process to Support Sustainable Construction [J].
Burke, Rebekah D. ;
Parrish, Kristen ;
El Asmar, Mounir .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 144 (05)