Norwegian Version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-NOR): Translation, Face Validity, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Inter-Rater Reliability

被引:1
作者
Schanke, Charlotte Marie [1 ]
Brekka, Anne Kristine [2 ,3 ]
Rimehaug, Stein Arne [1 ]
Klokkerud, Mari [1 ,4 ]
Andersen, Tiina Maarit [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Reg Rehabil Knowledge Ctr South East Norway, N-1453 Nesodden, Norway
[2] Sorlandet Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, N-4838 Arendal, Norway
[3] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Thorac Med, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[4] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Dept Rehabil Sci & Hlth Technol, N-0130 Oslo, Norway
[5] Bergen Univ Coll, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, N-5063 Bergen, Norway
关键词
physiotherapy; physical function; early rehabilitation; measurement tool; critical illness; CPAx; critical care; INTENSIVE-CARE; MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS; TASK-FORCE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POPULATION; VALIDATION; GUIDELINE; SOCIETY; QUALITY; COSMIN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12155033
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Assessment of physical and respiratory function in the intensive care unit (ICU) is useful for developing an individualized treatment plan and evaluating patient progress. There is a need for measurement tools that are culturally adapted, reliable and easy to use. The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx) is a valid measurement tool with strong psychometric properties for the intensive care population. This study aims to translate, adapt and test face validity and inter-rater reliability of the Norwegian version of CPAx (CPAx-NOR) for use in critically ill adult patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation. Method: CPAx-NOR was forward backward translated, culturally adapted and tested by experts and patients for face validity. Thereafter tested by 10 physiotherapists in five hospitals for inter-rater reliability. Results: The experts and pilot testers reached consensus on the translation and face validity. Patients were tested at time point A (n = 57) and at time point B (n = 53). The reliability of CPAx-NOR at "A" was 0.990 (0.983-0.994) and at "B" 0.994 (0.990-0.997). Based on A+B combined and adjusted, the ICC was 0.990 (95% CI 0.996-0.998). Standard error of measurement (SEM) was 0.68 and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was 1.89. The Bland-Altman plot showed low bias and no sign of heteroscedasticity. CPAx-NOR changed with a mean score of 14.9, and showed a moderate floor effect at the start of physiotherapy and low ceiling effects at discharge. Conclusion: CPAx-NOR demonstrated good face validity and excellent inter-rater reliability. It can be used as an assessment tool for physical function in critically ill adults receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation in Norway.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Altman D.G., 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
  • [2] Arias-Fernandez Patricia, 2018, J Phys Ther Sci, V30, P1193, DOI 10.1589/jpts.30.1193
  • [3] Reliability and responsiveness of the Danish version of The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx)
    Astrup, Katrine
    Corner, Evelyn
    Van Tulder, Maurits
    Sorensen, Lotte
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (01) : 193 - 199
  • [4] Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
    Beaton, DE
    Bombardier, C
    Guillemin, F
    Ferraz, MB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3186 - 3191
  • [5] Buanes E.A., 2022, ARSRAPPORT 2021 MED
  • [6] The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx): validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study
    Corner, E. J.
    Wood, H.
    Englebretsen, C.
    Thomas, A.
    Grant, R. L.
    Nikoletou, D.
    Soni, N.
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2013, 99 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [7] The responsiveness of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool in measuring functional recovery in the burns critical care population: An observational study
    Corner, Evelyn J.
    Hichens, Louise V.
    Attrill, Kate M.
    Vizcaychipi, Marcela P.
    Brett, Stephen J.
    Handy, Jonathan M.
    [J]. BURNS, 2015, 41 (02) : 241 - 247
  • [8] Construct validity of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool: an observational study of recovery from critical illness
    Corner, Evelyn J.
    Soni, Neil
    Handy, Jonathan M.
    Brett, Stephen J.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (02):
  • [9] HOW MUCH CHANGE IS TRUE CHANGE? THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE CHANGE OF THE BERG BALANCE SCALE IN ELDERLY PEOPLE
    Donoghue, Declan
    Stokes, Emma K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2009, 41 (05) : 343 - 346
  • [10] Predictive validity of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults: a prospective clinimetric study
    Eggmann, Sabrina
    Verra, Martin L.
    Stefanicki, Valentine
    Kindler, Angela
    Schefold, Joerg C.
    Zante, Bjoern
    Bastiaenen, Caroline H. G.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (01) : 111 - 116