Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening on All-Cause and CRC-Specific Mortality Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:42
作者
Zheng, Senshuang [1 ]
Schrijvers, Jelle J. A. [1 ]
Greuter, Marcel J. W. [2 ,3 ]
Kats-Ugurlu, Guersah [4 ]
Lu, Wenli [5 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Twente, Fac Elect Engn Math & Comp Sci, Tech Med Ctr, Robot & Mechatron RaM Grp, NL-7522 NH Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pathol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Tianjin Med Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Tianjin 300070, Peoples R China
关键词
colorectal cancer; screening; mortality reduction; simulation models; randomized control trials; meta-analysis; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; FOLLOW-UP; COLONOSCOPY; IMPACT; VALIDATION; ADHERENCE; PROGRAM; MODELS; INFORM;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15071948
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is one of the most effective measures to prevent CRC resulting in a decrease in CRC mortality. Mortality reduction (MR) from CRC screening was estimated based on large-scale randomized control trials (RCTs) as well as in model studies, as there is a wide range on CRC-specific MR and a lack of estimates of all-cause MR. We found that biennial FIT, gFOBT, single/5-yearly FS, and 10-yearly colonoscopy screenings reduced CRC-specific mortality significantly, and 10-yearly colonoscopy is the most effective with a mortality reduction of 73%. The effectiveness of screening increases at younger screening initiation ages and higher adherences. Our findings also suggest that adherence is an important factor in CRC-specific mortality and is an explanation for discrepancy in thus far published pooled estimates. (1) Background: The aim of this study was to pool and compare all-cause and colorectal cancer (CRC) specific mortality reduction of CRC screening in randomized control trials (RCTs) and simulation models, and to determine factors that influence screening effectiveness. (2) Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library were searched for eligible studies. Multiuse simulation models or RCTs that compared the mortality of CRC screening with no screening in general population were included. CRC-specific and all-cause mortality rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by a bivariate random model. (3) Results: 10 RCTs and 47 model studieswere retrieved. The pooled CRC-specific mortality rate ratios in RCTs were 0.88 (0.80, 0.96) and 0.76 (0.68, 0.84) for guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) and single flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening, respectively. For the model studies, the rate ratios were 0.45 (0.39, 0.51) for biennial fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), 0.31 (0.28, 0.34) for biennial gFOBT, 0.61 (0.53, 0.72) for single FS, 0.27 (0.21, 0.35) for 10-yearly colonoscopy, and 0.35 (0.29, 0.42) for 5-yearly FS. The CRC-specific mortality reduction of gFOBT increased with higher adherence in both studies (RCT: 0.78 (0.68, 0.89) vs. 0.92 (0.87, 0.98), model: 0.30 (0.28, 0.33) vs. 0.92 (0.51, 1.63)). Model studies showed a 0.62-1.1% all-cause mortality reduction with single FS screening. (4) Conclusions: Based on RCTs and model studies, biennial FIT/gFOBT, single and 5-yearly FS, and 10-yearly colonoscopy screening significantly reduces CRC-specific mortality. The model estimates are much higher than in RCTs, because the simulated biennial gFOBT assumes higher adherence. The effectiveness of screening increases at younger screening initiation ages and higher adherences.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries
    Allemani, Claudia
    Matsuda, Tomohiro
    Di Carlo, Veronica
    Harewood, Rhea
    Matz, Melissa
    Niksic, Maja
    Bonaventure, Audrey
    Valkov, Mikhail
    Johnson, Christopher J.
    Esteve, Jacques
    Ogunbiyi, Olufemi J.
    Azevedo e Silva, Gulnar
    Chen, Wan-Qing
    Eser, Sultan
    Engholm, Gerda
    Stiller, Charles A.
    Monnereau, Alain
    Woods, Ryan R.
    Visser, Otto
    Lim, Gek Hsiang
    Aitken, Joanne
    Weir, Hannah K.
    Coleman, Michel P.
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 391 (10125) : 1023 - 1075
  • [2] American Cancer Society, CAN COL POL CANC BE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to Essential Practice
  • [4] Long-term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 17 years of follow-up: the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial
    Atkin, Wendy
    Wooldrage, Kate
    Parkin, D. Maxwell
    Kralj-Hans, Ines
    MacRae, Eilidh
    Shah, Urvi
    Duffy, Stephen
    Cross, Amanda J.
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10076) : 1299 - 1311
  • [5] Babela R., 2021, EUR J CANCER PREV, DOI DOI 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000727
  • [6] Colorectal Cancer Screening-Who, How, and When?
    Bevan, Roisin
    Rutter, Matthew D.
    [J]. CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 51 (01) : 37 - 49
  • [7] Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies
    Brenner, Hermann
    Stock, Christian
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [8] Impact of differences in adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rate on the long-term effectiveness of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening
    Bronzwaer, Maxime E. S.
    Greuter, Marjolein J. E.
    Bleijenberg, Arne G. C.
    IJspeert, Joep E. G.
    Dekker, Evelien
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [9] Buskermolen M, 2022, ENDOSCOPY, V54, P871, DOI [10.1055/a-1726-9144, 10.1055/a-1773-7066]
  • [10] Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a microsimulation modelling study
    Buskermolen, Maaike
    Cenin, Dayna R.
    Helsingen, Lise M.
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Vandvik, Per Olav
    Haug, Ulrike
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 367