Applications of Recent Metaheuristic Algorithms for Loss Reduction in Distribution Power Systems considering Maximum Penetration of Photovoltaic Units

被引:8
作者
Nguyen, Le Duy Luan [1 ]
Nguyen, Phuc Khai [2 ,3 ]
Vo, Viet Cuong [1 ]
Vo, Ngoc Dieu [2 ,3 ]
Nguyen, Thang Trung [4 ]
Phan, Tan Minh [4 ]
机构
[1] Ho Chi Minh City Univ Technol & Educ, Fac Elect & Elect Engn, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Ho Chi Minh City Univ Technol HCMUT, Dept Power Syst, 268 Ly Thuong Kiet St,Dist 10, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Vietnam Natl Univ Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Elect & Elect Engn, Power Syst Optimizat Res Grp, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
RENEWABLE ENERGY-SOURCES; OPTIMAL ALLOCATION; OPTIMAL LOCATION; DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM; CHARGING STATIONS; GENERATION UNITS; PLACEMENT; DGS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1155/2023/9709608
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Radial distribution power systems (RDPSs) are essential in the power system to supply electricity to loads for developing industries, commerce, and services in countries. However, RDPSs have many distribution lines with high resistance, causing high active power loss. So, the core target of the study is to reduce the total active power loss, considering the highest penetration level of installed PVUs. Photovoltaic units (PVUs) are placed optimally by implementing the Coot optimization algorithm (COOA), the archimedes optimization algorithm (AOA), the transient search optimization algorithm (TSOA), the crystal structure algorithm (CrSA), the war strategy optimization algorithm (WSA), and the average and subtraction-based optimizer (ASBO). Two test RDPSs with 33 and 69 nodes are employed for four different study cases, including (1) the number of PVUs is three and the power factor is 1.0; (2) the number of PVUs is three, and the power factor is optimally determined; (3) the number of PVUs is determined optimally while the power factor is 1.0; and (4) the number of PVUs and the power factor of PVUs are optimally determined. For the first system, COOA can reach smaller power losses than others by 0.14% to 13.059% for Case 1, 0.5% to 77.89% for Case 2, 0.101% to 10.126% for Case 3, and 11.818% to 88.492% for Case 4. For the second system, COOA can reach a lower loss than others by 0.164% to 15.511% for Case 1, 0.774% to 78.6% for Case 2, 0.173% to 15.104% for Case 3, and 46.201% to 95.389% for Case 4. Especially in Case 4, the power loss is approximately equal to zero. The loss reduction is the first significant contribution of the study. In addition, the study also investigated the difference between the four cases for obtaining power loss reduction, the maximum penetration level of active and reactive power of PVUs, and the improvement of load voltage. As a result, Case 4 is superior to the three other cases. Thus, the number, peak power, power factor, and location of added PVUs in RDPSs should be simultaneously optimized, and one of the most effective optimization tools is COOA.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Optimizing DG penetration in distribution networks concerning protection schemes and technical impact [J].
Abdel-Ghany, Hossam A. ;
Azmy, Ahmed M. ;
Elkalashy, Nagy I. ;
Rashad, Essam M. .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2015, 128 :113-122
[2]   Impact analysis of electric vehicle charging station integration with distributed generators on power systems [J].
Aggarwal, Surbhi ;
Singh, Amit Kumar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUIT THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 49 (06) :1811-1827
[3]   A hybrid algorithm (BAPSO) for capacity configuration optimization in a distributed solar PV based microgrid [J].
Almadhor, Ahmad ;
Rauf, Hafiz Tayyab ;
Khan, Muhammad Attique ;
Kadry, Seifedine ;
Nam, Yunyoung .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 :7906-7912
[4]   A new approach for optimum simultaneous multi-DG distributed generation Units placement and sizing based on maximization of system loadability using HPSO (hybrid particle swarm optimization) algorithm [J].
Aman, M. M. ;
Jasmon, G. B. ;
Bakar, A. H. A. ;
Mokhlis, H. .
ENERGY, 2014, 66 :202-215
[5]  
Ang S., 2018, GMSARN INT J, V12, P202
[6]   War Strategy Optimization Algorithm: A New Effective Metaheuristic Algorithm for Global Optimization [J].
Ayyarao, Tummala. S. L. V. ;
Ramakrishna, N. S. S. ;
Elavarasan, Rajvikram Madurai ;
Polumahanthi, Nishanth ;
Rambabu, M. ;
Saini, Gaurav ;
Khan, Baseem ;
Alatas, Bilal .
IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 :25073-25105
[7]   Optimal siting and sizing of distributed generation in radial distribution system using a novel student psychology-based optimization algorithm [J].
Balu, Korra ;
Mukherjee, V .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2021, 33 (22) :15639-15667
[8]   Multi-objective simultaneous optimal planning of electrical vehicle fast charging stations and DGs in distribution system [J].
Battapothula, Gurappa ;
Yammani, Chandrasekhar ;
Maheswarapu, Sydulu .
JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2019, 7 (04) :923-934
[9]   Optimal active and reactive power allocation in distribution networks using a novel heuristic approach [J].
Bayat, A. ;
Bagheri, A. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 233 :71-85
[10]   Frequency Selective Surface Design Using Coot Optimization Algorithm for 5G Applications [J].
Boursianis, Achilles D. ;
Papadopoulou, Maria S. ;
Salucci, Marco ;
Polo, Alessandro ;
Sarigiannidis, Panagiotis ;
Koulouridis, Stavros ;
Goudos, Sotirios K. .
2022 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ANTENNA TECHNOLOGY (IWAT), 2022, :184-187