Confidence intervals for prevalence estimates from complex surveys with imperfect assays

被引:3
作者
Bayer, Damon M. [1 ,2 ]
Fay, Michael P. [1 ,4 ]
Graubard, Barry I. [3 ]
机构
[1] NIAID, Biostat Res Branch, Bethesda, MD USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Stat, Irvine, CA USA
[3] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, Rockville, MD USA
[4] NIAID, Biostat Res Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
confidence distributions; melding confidence intervals; seroprevalence; survey sampling; weighted sampling; DIRECTLY STANDARDIZED RATES; P-VALUES; APPROXIMATE;
D O I
10.1002/sim.9701
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There are established methods for estimating disease prevalence with associated confidence intervals for complex surveys with perfect assays, or simple random sample surveys with imperfect assays. We develop and study methods for the complicated case of complex surveys with imperfect assays. The new methods use the melding method to combine gamma intervals for directly standardized rates and established adjustments for imperfect assays by estimating sensitivity and specificity. One of the new methods appears to have at least nominal coverage in all simulated scenarios. We compare our new methods to established methods in special cases (complex surveys with perfect assays or simple surveys with imperfect assays). In some simulations, our methods appear to guarantee coverage, while competing methods have much lower than nominal coverage, especially when overall prevalence is very low. In other settings, our methods are shown to have higher than nominal coverage. We apply our method to a seroprevalence survey of SARS-CoV-2 in undiagnosed adults in the United States between May and July 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:1822 / 1867
页数:46
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions [J].
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1998, 52 (02) :119-126
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Analysis of health surveys
[3]   THE MULTINOMIAL-POISSON TRANSFORMATION [J].
BAKER, SG .
STATISTICIAN, 1994, 43 (04) :495-504
[4]   P-VALUES MAXIMIZED OVER A CONFIDENCE SET FOR THE NUISANCE PARAMETER [J].
BERGER, RL ;
BOOS, DD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 89 (427) :1012-1016
[5]   APPROXIMATE BINOMIAL CONFIDENCE-LIMITS [J].
BLYTH, CR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 81 (395) :843-855
[6]   Exact inference for disease prevalence based on a test with unknown specificity and sensitivity [J].
Cai, Bryan ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Bendavid, Eran ;
Tian, Lu .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2023, 50 (11-12) :2599-2623
[7]   The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. [J].
Clopper, CJ ;
Pearson, ES .
BIOMETRIKA, 1934, 26 :404-413
[8]  
Dean N., 2015, J Surv Stat Methodol, V3, P484, DOI DOI 10.1093/JSSAM/SMV024
[9]   Confidence Intervals for Seroprevalence [J].
DiCiccio, Thomas J. ;
Ritzwoller, David M. ;
Romano, Joseph P. ;
Shaikh, Azeem M. .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 37 (03) :306-321
[10]   Interpreting p-Values and Confidence Intervals Using Well-Calibrated Null Preference Priors [J].
Fay, Michael P. ;
Proschan, Michael A. ;
Brittain, Erica H. ;
Tiwari, Ram .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 37 (04) :455-472