Therapeutic and adverse effects of adrenaline on patients who suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
Zhong, Hong [1 ,3 ]
Yin, Zhaohui [2 ]
Kou, Bojin [1 ]
Shen, Pei [1 ]
He, Guoli [1 ]
Huang, Tingting [1 ]
Liang, Jing [1 ]
Huang, Shan [1 ]
Huang, Jiaming [1 ]
Zhou, Manhong [1 ,3 ]
Deng, Renli [4 ]
机构
[1] Zunyi Med Univ, Emergency Dept, Affiliated Hosp, Zunyi 563003, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[2] KweiChow Moutai Hosp, Gen Surg Dept, Renhuai 564501, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[3] KweiChow Moutai Hosp, Emergency Dept, Renhuai 564501, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zunyi Med Univ, Nursing Dept, Affiliated Hosp, Zunyi 563003, Guizhou, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cardiac arrest; Epinephrine; Out-of-hospital; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; HEART-ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; PREHOSPITAL EPINEPHRINE; LIFE-SUPPORT; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; PERFUSION; SCORE; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s40001-022-00974-8
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective The efficacy and safety of epinephrine in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains controversial. The meta-analysis was used to comprehensively appraise the influence of epinephrine in OHCA patients.Methods We searched all randomized controlled and cohort studies published by PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from the inception to August 2022 on the prognostic impact of epinephrine on patients with OHCA. Survival to discharge was the primary outcome, while the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and favorable neurological outcome were secondary outcomes.Results The meta-analysis included 18 studies involving 863,952 patients. OHCA patients with adrenaline had an observably improved chance of ROSC (RR 2.81; 95% CI 2.21-3.57; P = 0.001) in randomized controlled studies, but the difference in survival to discharge (RR 1.27; 95% CI 0.58-2.78; P = 0.55) and favorable neurological outcomes (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.90-1.62; P = 0.21) between the two groups was not statistically significant. In cohort studies, the rate of ROSC (RR 1.62; 95% CI 1.14-2.30; P = 0.007) increased significantly with the adrenaline group, while survival to discharge (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.55-0.98; P = 0.03) and favorable cerebral function (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30-0.58; P = 0.001) were lower than the non-adrenaline group.Conclusion We found that both the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies showed that adrenaline increased ROSC in OHCA patients. However, they were unable to agree on a long-term prognosis. The cohort studies showed that adrenaline had an adverse effect on the long-term prognosis of OHCA patients (discharge survival rate and good neurological prognosis), but adrenaline had no adverse effect in the RCTs. In addition to the differences in research methods, there are also some potential confounding factors in the included studies. Therefore, more high-quality studies are needed to fully confirm the effect of adrenaline on the long-term results of OHCA.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Early administration of epinephrine (adrenaline) in patients with cardiac arrest with initial shockable rhythm in hospital: propensity score matched analysis
    Andersen, Lars W.
    Kurth, Tobias
    Chase, Maureen
    Berg, Katherine M.
    Cocchi, Michael N.
    Callaway, Clifton
    Donnino, Michael W.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 353
  • [2] Total epinephrine dose during asystole and pulseless electrical activity cardiac arrests is associated with unfavourable functional outcome and increased in-hospital mortality
    Arrich, Jasmin
    Sterz, Fritz
    Herkner, Harald
    Testori, Christoph
    Behringer, Wilhelm
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2012, 83 (03) : 333 - 337
  • [3] A TIME-DEPENDENT PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING APPROACH TO ASSESS EPINEPHRINE USE ON PATIENTS SURVIVAL WITHIN OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST CARE
    Baert, Valentine
    Hubert, Herve
    Chouihed, Tahar
    Claustre, Clement
    Wiel, Eric
    Escutnaire, Josephine
    Jaeger, Deborah
    Vilhelm, Christian
    Segal, Nicolas
    Adnet, Frederic
    Gueugniaud, Pierre-Yves
    Tazarourte, Karim
    Mebazaa, Alexandre
    Fraticelli, Laurie
    Khoury, Carlos El
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (04) : 542 - 552
  • [4] Benjamin EJ, 2019, CIRCULATION, V139, pE56, DOI [10.1161/CIR.0000000000000746, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659]
  • [5] Epinephrine for cardiac arrest
    Callaway, Clifton W.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 28 (01) : 36 - 42
  • [6] Questioning the Use of Epinephrine to Treat Cardiac Arrest
    Callaway, Clifton W.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (11): : 1198 - 1200
  • [7] NOX4-dependent neuronal autotoxicity and BBB breakdown explain the superior sensitivity of the brain to ischemic damage
    Casas, Ana I.
    Geuss, Eva
    Kleikers, Pamela W. M.
    Mencl, Stine
    Herrmann, Alexander M.
    Buendia, Izaskun
    Egea, Javier
    Meuth, Sven G.
    Lopez, Manuela G.
    Kleinschnitz, Christoph
    Schmidt, Harald H. H. W.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (46) : 12315 - 12320
  • [8] European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 4 Adult advanced life support
    Deakin, Charles D.
    Nolan, Jerry P.
    Soar, Jasmeet
    Sunde, Kjetil
    Koster, Rudolph W.
    Smith, Gary B.
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2010, 81 (10) : 1305 - 1352
  • [9] Is Epinephrine During Cardiac Arrest Associated With Worse Outcomes in Resuscitated Patients?
    Dumas, Florence
    Bougouin, Wulfran
    Geri, Guillaume
    Lamhaut, Lionel
    Bougle, Adrien
    Daviaud, Fabrice
    Morichau-Beauchant, Tristan
    Rosencher, Julien
    Marijon, Eloi
    Carli, Pierre
    Jouven, Xavier
    Rea, Thomas D.
    Cariou, Alain
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (22) : 2360 - 2367
  • [10] Assessment of patient preferences: Integrating treatments and outcomes
    Fried, TR
    Bradley, EH
    Towle, VR
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2002, 57 (06): : S348 - S354