Downsizing and the use of timber as embodied carbon reduction strategies for new-build housing: A partial life cycle assessment

被引:8
作者
Souaid, Cynthia [1 ]
ten Caat, Pieter Nick [1 ]
Meijer, Arjen [1 ]
Visscher, Henk [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Embodied carbon; Life cycle assessment; Timber construction; Downsizing; House size; Housing; ENERGY BUILDINGS; SIZE; EMISSIONS; EFFICIENCY; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111285
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The 2050 decarbonization goals coupled with the growing housing shortage in Europe intensify the pressure on new-build dwellings to enhance their energy performance. Beyond a zero operational energy, the focus has shifted towards reducing embodied carbon (EC). Against this backdrop, this study investigates the simultaneous impact of downsizing and the use of timber in new-build dwellings, EC reduction strategies seldom explored concurrently. Through partial life cycle assessments, three scenarios are modelled: the Small, Medium, and Large House, with two construction variations for each, comparing a modular timber design to a conventional concrete alternative. Designs are based on dwellings built in Almere, the Netherlands. Data is extracted from the Swiss Ecoinvent database using the TOTEM tool and the static -1/+1 approach for biogenic carbon accounting is adopted. Results show a total EC ranging from 42,608 to 70,384 kgCO2eq for the timber designs versus 54,681 to 91,270 kgCO2eq for their concrete counterparts. Findings suggest that the relationship between house size and EC is sublinear whereby a house twice the size entails less than twice the EC emissions. Only the simultaneous implementation of downsizing and the use of timber achieved 53% carbon savings. The discussion explores implications of outcomes across academic, industry and policy perspectives, challenges in implementing smaller timber dwellings, and study limitations and future research. Beyond its empirical contribution, this paper offers a practical contribution with its hierarchical data analysis approach covering building, element and component. This approach can be implemented by researchers and practitioners alike to inform their design process.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Comparative life cycle assessment of cross laminated timber building and concrete building with special focus on biogenic carbon [J].
Andersen, Julie Hansted ;
Rasmussen, Nana Lin ;
Ryberg, Morten Walbech .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 254
[2]  
Andrews J, 2014, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Reports: FY 14 Briefing
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, TECHNICAL REPORT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, EMISSIONS GAP REPORT, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2022.231848
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Official Journal of the European Union, L153 of, V18, P13, DOI [DOI 10.3000/17252555.L_2010.153.ENG, 10.3000/17252555.L_2010.153.eng]
[6]   Housing Spaces in Nine European Countries: A Comparison of Dimensional Requirements [J].
Appolloni, Letizia ;
D'Alessandro, Daniela .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (08)
[7]   Energy Efficiency of Buildings: The Aspect of Embodied Energy [J].
Balouktsi, Maria ;
Luetzkendorf, Thomas .
ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 4 (01) :31-43
[8]   Cradle to site Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of natural vs conventional building materials: A case study on cob earthen material [J].
Ben-Alon, Lola ;
Loftness, Vivian ;
Harries, Kent A. ;
DiPietro, Gwen ;
Hameen, Erica Cochran .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 160
[9]   THE LEAP TO ZERO CARBON AND ZERO EMISSIONS: Understanding How to Go Beyond Existing Sustainable Design Protocols [J].
Boake, Terri Meyer .
JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2008, 3 (04) :64-77
[10]  
Cabeza L.F., 2022, Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change