Attitudes and perceptions of wood energy technologies in the Great Lakes region, USA

被引:1
作者
Huff, Emily S. [1 ]
Mittlefehldt, Sarah [2 ]
Bunting, Erin [3 ]
Welsh, Joseph [4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Forestry, 480 Wilson Rd,Rm 126, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Northern Michigan Univ, Dept Eart & Environm & Geog Sci, Marquette, MI USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Geog Environm & Spatial Sci, E Lansing, MI USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Remote Sesning & GIS Res & Outreach Serv, E Lansing, MI USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Wood energy; Public perceptions; Social acceptability; Bioenergy; RENEWABLE ENERGY; ACCEPTANCE; BIOFUELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106897
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This paper explores social acceptance of different wood-based energy applications in the Great Lakes region in the Upper Midwest, USA. Specifically, the paper examines attitudes and perceptions towards residential wood burning, commercial-scale wood boilers for heat, combined heat and power (CHP) facilities, and industrial power generation in Michigan. In 2021, we conducted a state-wide survey (n = 207) and 30 semi-structured interviews with individuals representing different stakeholder perspectives, including regulatory agencies, biomass industry leaders, non-governmental organizations and scientists who have shaped biomass debates, forest products workers, and Michigan residents. Results suggest that the depth of an individual's knowledge about different types of wood energy applications generally led to more positive attitudes, particularly for smaller-scale uses of wood for heat. Despite perceived environmental, economic, and human health risks of using wood for different energy applications, across all stakeholder groups, 70% of respondents perceived environmental benefits, 61% perceived economic benefits, and 57% perceived health benefits. Changing economic and environmental conditions in different parts of the state contributed to people's attitudes toward different forms of wood energy and their perceptions of associated risks and benefits. A key recommendation of this study is that policy-makers and energy developers seek to understand the complex factors that influence social acceptance when planning for the adoption of new types of wood-based bioenergy technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Banerjee A., 2017, Environmental Sociology, V3, P381, DOI [10.1080/23251042.2016.1272181, DOI 10.1080/23251042.2016.1272181, https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1272181]
[2]   Wood fuel supply as a function of forest owner preferences and management styles [J].
Bohlin, F ;
Roos, A .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 22 (04) :237-249
[3]   Social versus Biophysical Availability of Wood in the Northern United States [J].
Butler, Brett J. ;
Ma, Zhao ;
Kittredge, David B. ;
Catanzaro, Paul .
NORTHERN JOURNAL OF APPLIED FORESTRY, 2010, 27 (04) :151-159
[4]   What drives public acceptance of second-generation biofuels? Evidence from Canada [J].
Dragojlovic, Nick ;
Einsiedel, Edna .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2015, 75 :201-212
[5]   Price dynamics in Wisconsin woody biomass markets [J].
Du, Xiaodong ;
Runge, Troy .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 63 :250-256
[6]   Bioenergy Futures: Framing Sociotechnical Imaginaries in Local Places [J].
Eaton, Weston M. ;
Gasteyer, Stephen P. ;
Busch, Lawrence .
RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2014, 79 (02) :227-256
[7]   Beyond commonplace biofuels: Social aspects of ethanol [J].
Esteves Ribeiro, Barbara .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 57 :355-362
[8]   Triangulation and Mixed Methods Designs: Data Integration With New Research Technologies [J].
Fielding, Nigel G. .
JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2012, 6 (02) :124-136
[9]   BIOMASS ENERGY [J].
HALL, DO .
ENERGY POLICY, 1991, 19 (08) :711-737
[10]   Strength in diversity? Past dynamics and future drivers affecting demand for sugar, ethanol, biogas and bioelectricity from Brazil's sugarcane sector [J].
Hughes, Nick ;
Mutran, Victoria Morgado ;
Tomei, Julia ;
Ribeiro, Celma de Oliveira ;
Oller do Nascimento, Claudio Augusto .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2020, 141