Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars Using Nanohybrid Composite, Fiber-Reinforced Composite, Horizontal Glass Fiber Posts, and Ceramic Inlays: An In Vitro Study

被引:6
作者
Naik, Asmita [1 ]
de Ataide, Ida de Noronha [1 ]
Fernandes, Marina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Goa Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Bambolim, Goa, India
[2] Goa Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Bambolim 403202, Goa, India
关键词
Inlays; ceramics; composite resin; fiber-reinforced composite; horizontal fiber post; CORE BUILDUP MATERIALS; MAXILLARY PREMOLARS; BOND STRENGTH; RESIN CEMENTS; RESTORATIONS; PLACEMENT; BULK;
D O I
10.1016/j.joen.2023.08.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study evaluated the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars (ETPs) with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities filled with nanohybrid composite (NHC), fiber-reinforced composite (FRC), horizontal glass fiber posts (HFP), and ceramic inlays (CI). Methods: Eighty-four intact maxillary premolars were taken, and endodontic treatment was performed followed by MOD cavity preparations (except in the control group). They were distributed into 7 groups based on type of restoration: intact teeth (control group), ETP + MOD (not restored), NHC, FRC + NHC, HFP + NHC, FRC + HFP + NHC, and CI groups. Samples were subjected to universal testing machine until the fracture occurred and failure mode was visually inspected. Results: Mean and standard deviation of fracture resistance of the 7 groups ranged from 265.6 +/- 68.0 N to 1023.7 +/- 76.5 N. The highest reading was noted for intact teeth followed by FRC + HFP + NHC group and then the CI group, with no significant difference among the 3 groups. The lowest reading was noted for the ETP + MOD group. Maximum unrepairable fractures were seen in the ETP + MOD and CI groups. Conclusion: FRC + HFP + NHC combination and CIs increased the resistance to fracture of ETPs significantly. (J Endod 2023;49:1739-1746.)
引用
收藏
页码:1739 / 1746
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with Post-retained Restorations: An Overview
    Al-Omiri, Mahmoud Khaled
    Mahmoud, Ahmad Abdelaziz
    Rayyan, Mohammad Ramadan
    Abu-Hammad, Osama
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2010, 36 (09) : 1439 - 1449
  • [2] Evaluation of Fracture Resistance in Root Canal-Treated Teeth Restored Using Different Techniques
    Aslan, T.
    Sagsen, B.
    Er, O.
    Ustun, Y.
    Cinar, F.
    [J]. NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 21 (06) : 795 - 800
  • [3] Aslan T, 2018, Niger J Clin Pract, V21, P795
  • [4] Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite
    Atalay, C.
    Yazici, A. R.
    Horuztepe, A.
    Nagas, E.
    Ertan, A.
    Ozgunaltay, G.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 41 (05) : E131 - E140
  • [5] Bilgi Priyanka Shripad, 2016, J Conserv Dent, V19, P364, DOI 10.4103/0972-0707.186458
  • [6] Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin
    Bitter, Kerstin
    Paris, Sebastian
    Pfuertner, Cindy
    Neumann, Konrad
    Kielbassa, Andrej M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2009, 117 (03) : 326 - 333
  • [7] Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with horizontal fiberglass posts or indirect techniques
    Bromberg, Carolina Ritter
    Alves, Caroline Beatriz
    Stona, Deborah
    Spohr, Ana Maria
    Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto
    Melara, Rafael
    Burnett, Luiz Henrique
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 147 (12) : 952 - 958
  • [8] Costa Akf, 2014, Oper Dent, V39, pE160, DOI 10.2341/13-092-L
  • [9] Dalpino PHP, 2002, AM J DENT, V15, P389
  • [10] Evaluation of Bond Strength, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Strength of Bulk- vs Incrementally-filled Restorations
    de Assis, Fernanda Silva
    Linares Lima, Suellen Nogueira
    Tonetto, Mateus Rodrigues
    Bhandi, Shilpa H.
    Souza Pinto, Shelon Cristina
    Malaquias, Pamela
    Loguercio, Alessandro D.
    Bandeca, Matheus Coelho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 18 (04) : 317 - 323