Four single implant-supported crowns replacing the maxillary incisors: A retrospective report of 10 cases with 2-9?years of follow-up

被引:1
作者
Koster, Maysa [1 ]
Dias, Debora R. [1 ,3 ]
Zimiani, Gabriela de S. [1 ]
Santos, Rafael P. da M. [1 ]
de Oliveira, Ricardo P. [2 ]
Araujo, Mauricio G. [1 ]
Hayacibara, Roberto M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Maringa, Dept Dent, Maringa, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Maringa, Dept Stat, Maringa, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Maringa, Ave Mandacaru 1550,Bloco S-08, BR-87080000 Maringa, Parana, Brazil
关键词
case series; clinical study; esthetics; implant-supported fixed dental prostheses; maxillary incisors; narrow-diameter implants; unitary crown; NARROW-DIAMETER IMPLANTS; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; BONE LOSS; INTERIMPLANT DISTANCE; ADJACENT IMPLANTS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; CONSENSUS REPORT; PAPILLA; HEIGHT; REHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14175
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis retrospective case series aimed to assess the stability of the papilla around four single crowns supported by narrow-diameter implants replacing all maxillary incisors. Secondary objectives included assessment of marginal bone level stability, incidence of technical and biological complications, and patient satisfaction.Materials and MethodsIndividuals with four adjacent implants in maxillary incisor sites, placed with a 3 mm inter-implant distance and rehabilitated with single crowns were included. Retrospective data were obtained from photographs and radiographs taken at the delivery of the prosthesis (baseline-T0). Patients were then recalled (& GE;2 years after T0) for clinical and radiographic examination (follow-up-T1). Photographs were obtained and patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Papilla height and marginal bone level were compared over time.ResultsData from 10 patients with medium-low smile lines and rehabilitated with 40 implants, in function for 5.4 & PLUSMN; 1.9 years, were analyzed. The papilla height between implants (T0: 2.3 & PLUSMN; 0.9 mm; T1: 2.6 & PLUSMN; 0.7 mm; p = .011) and between tooth and implant (T0: 3.4 & PLUSMN; 0.9 mm; T1: 3.8 & PLUSMN; 0.8 mm; p = .025) increased significantly over the years. The marginal bone level remained stable over time (T0: 0.88 & PLUSMN; 0.57 mm; T1: 0.71 & PLUSMN; 0.67 mm; p = .007). Patients were highly satisfied (97.7 & PLUSMN; 0.3%) with the treatment outcome.ConclusionWithin its limitations, this study demonstrated that four single implant-supported crowns placed at maxillary incisor sites may exhibit soft tissue and marginal bone stability over a long period of time. This treatment approach, however, should be restricted to few patients as it requires a proper case selection and skillful execution of all surgical and prosthetic steps.
引用
收藏
页码:1438 / 1449
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Implant-Supported Single Crowns Replacing Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A 5-Year Follow-Up
    Branzen, Marie
    Eliasson, Alf
    Arnrup, Kristina
    Bazargani, Farhan
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (06) : 1134 - 1140
  • [2] Influence of Implant Position on Clinical Crown Length and Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dimensions at Implant-Supported Single Crowns Replacing Maxillary Central Incisors
    Peng, Min
    Fei, Wei
    Hosseini, Mandana
    Gotfredsen, Klaus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 33 (06) : 785 - +
  • [3] Performance of zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth crowns in esthetic areas: a retrospective study up to 12-year follow-up
    Passos, Sheila Pestana
    Linke, Bernie
    Larjava, Hannu
    French, David
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [4] Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis in a Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia Patient: A Case Report With 3 Years Follow-up and Review of the Literature
    Stern, J. Kobi
    Hansen, Trisha
    Frankel, Joel
    Evian, Cyril
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (04) : 394 - 400
  • [5] Mechanical Complication Rates and Optimal Horizontal Distance of the Most Distally Positioned Implant-Supported Single Crowns in the Posterior Region: A Study with a Mean Follow-Up of 3 Years
    Lee, Jae-Hong
    Lee, Jong-Bin
    Park, Jung-Im
    Choi, Seong-Ho
    Kim, Young-Taek
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (07): : 517 - 524
  • [6] Immediate Placement and Restoration of a Single Implant to Replace Two Adjacent Periodontally Compromised Mandibular Incisors: A Technique Report with up to 8 Years of Follow-up
    Amato, Francesco
    Spedicato, Giorgio A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2025, 40 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [7] Long-term results of implant-supported over-dentures retained by double crowns: a practice-based retrospective study after minimally 10 years follow-up
    Frisch, Eberhard
    Ziebolz, Dirk
    Rinke, Sven
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (12) : 1281 - 1287
  • [8] Infraposition of anterior maxillary implant-supported single-tooth restorations in adolescent and adult patients-A prospective follow-up study up to 6 years
    Nilsson, Andree
    Johansson, Lars-Ake
    Stenport, Victoria F.
    Wennerberg, Ann
    Ekfeldt, Anders
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (05) : 953 - 959
  • [9] Ten years follow-up retrospective study on implant survival rates and prevalence of peri-implantitis in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitations
    Francetti, Luca
    Cavalli, Nicolo
    Taschieri, Silvio
    Corbella, Stefano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (03) : 250 - 258
  • [10] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extension. A retrospective cohort study with a follow-up of at least 10 years
    Schmid, Eric
    Morandini, Michele
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    Ramseier, Christoph A.
    Sculean, Anton
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (12) : 1243 - 1252