Consensus on an assessment protocol for children with speech sound disorders in Sri Lanka

被引:0
作者
Hamza, Fathima Shimla [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Unicomb, Rachael [1 ]
Hewat, Sally [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Univ Dr, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[2] Colombo South Teaching Hosp, Kalubowila, Dehiwela, Sri Lanka
[3] OST Therapy, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Newcastle, Univ Dr, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
关键词
assessment protocol; speech sound disorders; Sri Lanka; Delphi method; LANGUAGE PATHOLOGISTS; MULTILINGUAL CHILDREN; TARGET-SELECTION; IMPAIRMENT; DIFFICULTIES; INTERVENTION; EXPERIENCES; LITERACY; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/1460-6984.12890
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
BackgroundSpeech sound disorders (SSDs) are the most common form of communication disorders in children. SSD have an impact on children's abilities to make themselves understood to their listeners and can influence a child's social and emotional well-being as well as their academic achievements. Therefore, it is important to identify children with an SSD early, in order to provide appropriate intervention. A wealth of information on best practice in the assessment of children with SSD is available in countries where the speech and language therapy profession is well established. In Sri Lanka, there is a paucity of research evidence supporting assessment practices that are culturally and linguistically appropriate in SSDs. Therefore, clinicians rely on informal assessment methods. There is a need to understand more about how clinicians in Sri Lanka assess this caseload in order to get general agreement regarding comprehensive and consistent procedures for assessment of paediatric SSD in Sri Lanka. This would support speech and language therapists' (SLTs') clinical decision-making in relation to choice of appropriate goals and intervention for this caseload. AimTo develop and gain consensus on an assessment protocol for Sri Lankan children with SSD that is culturally appropriate and based on existing research. MethodA modified Delphi method was utilised to gather data from clinicians currently working in Sri Lanka. The research involved three rounds of data collection, exploring current assessment practices in Sri Lanka, ranking these in order of priority and establishing consensus on a proposed assessment protocol. The proposed assessment protocol was based on the results of the first and second rounds as well as previously published best practice guidelines. Outcome and ResultsThe proposed assessment protocol achieved consensus in relation to content, format and cultural appropriateness. SLTs affirmed the usefulness of the protocol within the Sri Lankan context. Further research is required to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of this protocol in practice. Conclusions & ImplicationsThe assessment protocol supports practicing SLTs with a general guide to assessing children with suspected SSDs in Sri Lanka. The application of this protocol built upon consensus enables clinicians to improve their individual practice patterns based on best practice recommendations in the literature and the evidence on culturally and linguistically appropriate practices. This study has identified the need for further research in this area, including the development of culturally and linguistically specific assessment tools that would complement the use of this protocol. What this paper addsWhat is already known on the subjectThe assessment of children with speech sound disorders (SSDs) requires a comprehensive and holistic approach due to their heterogeneous nature. Although there is evidence to support the assessment of paediatric SSDs in many countries where the profession of speech and language therapy is established, there is limited evidence to support the assessment of children with SSDs in Sri Lanka. What this study addsThis study provides information about current assessment practices in Sri Lanka and consensus on a proposed culturally appropriate protocol for the assessment of children with SSDs in this country. What are the clinical implications of this work?The proposed assessment protocol provides speech and language therapists in Sri Lanka with a guide for assessment of paediatric SSDs to support more consistent practice in this area. Future evaluation of this preliminary protocol is required; however, the methodology used in this research could be applied to the development of assessment protocols for other range of practice areas in this country.
引用
收藏
页码:1610 / 1629
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
American SpeechLanguageHearing Association, Speech sound disorders: Articulation and phonology Practice portal
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, DOI DOI 10.1179/136132809805335256
[3]   Evidence-Based Practice for Children With Speech Sound Disorders: Part 1 Narrative Review [J].
Baker, Elise ;
McLeod, Sharynne .
LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2011, 42 (02) :102-139
[4]   Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? [J].
Birt, Linda ;
Scott, Suzanne ;
Cavers, Debbie ;
Campbell, Christine ;
Walter, Fiona .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (13) :1802-1811
[5]   Evaluating articulation and phonological disorders when the clock is running [J].
Bleile, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2002, 11 (03) :243-249
[6]   Is speech and language therapy effective for children with primary speech and language impairment? Report of a randomized control trial [J].
Broomfield, Jan ;
Dodd, Barbara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2011, 46 (06) :628-640
[7]   Speech difficulties at school entry are a significant risk factor for later reading difficulties [J].
Burgoyne, Kelly ;
Lervag, Arne ;
Malone, Stephanie ;
Hulme, Charles .
EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2019, 49 :40-48
[8]  
Dharmarathna I., 2016, DEV VALIDATING SPEEC
[9]   Cross-linguistic generalization in the treatment of two sequential Spanish-English bilingual children with speech sound disorders [J].
Gildersleeve-Neumann, Christina ;
Goldstein, Brian A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2015, 17 (01) :26-40
[10]   Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness [J].
Graneheim, UH ;
Lundman, B .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2004, 24 (02) :105-112