Remote assessment of quality, processing and economic criteria in qualification of suppliers to the meat packaging foil producer-A Greek case study

被引:0
作者
Jakubowska-Gawlik, Katarzyna [1 ]
Kolanowski, Wojciech [2 ]
Mantzoros, Dimitris [3 ]
Czarniecka-Skubina, Ewa [1 ]
Trafialek, Joanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Life Sci WULS, Inst Human Nutr Sci, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Lublin, Fac Hlth Sci, Lublin, Poland
[3] Flexopack SA, Attiki, Greece
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; SELECTION; FOOD; MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATION; FRAMEWORK; COMPANY; MODEL; AHP;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0278021
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Supervision over the suppliers of packaging as well as suppliers of raw materials for packaging production is important to ensure the quality and safety of meat products. The aim of this study was to verify the remote evaluation procedure of quality, processing and economic criteria in qualification of raw materials suppliers to the meat packaging foil producer during the Covid-19 pandemic. The evaluation was done remotely in terms of meeting some of the requirements of the quality management system (QMS) in conditions where regular audit could not be carried out. The survey was conducted in one of the biggest packaging foil producers in Greece via its supplier evaluation. The evaluation consisted of: 1/ economic criteria and 2/ quality and processing criteria. The highest and the lowest rated economic criteria were procedural compliance and price of raw materials. Among the quality and processing criteria, the highest score was given to warranties and claims policies and material quality, and the lowest one to lead time. The highest ratings obtained suppliers of raw materials directly involved in production, suppliers from Greece, the USA and Denmark, as well as suppliers to the R&D department. The results of the study showed that the quality of the raw materials directly used in the production of packaging foil was adequate. Therefore, their use ensure production of packaging foil and finally packaged meat products of adequate quality and safety. The presented procedure occurred to be useful for remote evaluation of quality, processing and economic criteria in qualification of suppliers during the Covid-19 pandemic. It may inspire other producers of food packaging materials to continuing supervision over their suppliers while regular methods of control are limited.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Evaluation of the Parameters of the Green Supplier Selection Decision in Textile Industry [J].
Acar, Avni Zafer ;
Onden, Ismail ;
Gurel, Ozlem .
FIBRES & TEXTILES IN EASTERN EUROPE, 2016, 24 (05) :8-14
[2]   Supplier selection in the processed food industry under uncertainty [J].
Amorim, Pedro ;
Curcio, Eduardo ;
Almada-Lobo, Bernardo ;
Barbosa-Povoa, Ana P. F. D. ;
Grossmann, Ignacio E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 252 (03) :801-814
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ISO 9001
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ISO 22000
[5]  
Antosz K., 2012, ZARZADZ PRZEDS, V1, P1
[6]   On the polyhedral structure of two-level lot-sizing problems with supplier selection [J].
Arslan, Ayse N. ;
Richard, Jean-Philippe P. ;
Guan, Yongpei .
NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 2016, 63 (08) :647-666
[7]   How Supplier Economies of Scale Drive Supplier Selection Decisions [J].
Badorf, Florian ;
Wagner, Stephan M. ;
Hoberg, Kai ;
Papier, Felix .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2019, 55 (03) :45-67
[8]   Supplier Selection for Framework Agreements in Humanitarian Relief [J].
Balcik, Burcu ;
Ak, Deniz .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 23 (06) :1028-1041
[9]   Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry [J].
Banaeian, Narges ;
Mobli, Hossein ;
Fahimnia, Behnam ;
Nielsen, Izabela Ewa ;
Omid, Mahmoud .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2018, 89 :337-347
[10]   Tender evaluation and supplier selection methods in public procurement [J].
Bergman, Mats A. ;
Lundberg, Sofia .
JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2013, 19 (02) :73-83