Treatment of De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients With Calcineurin Inhibitor-free, Belatacept Plus Everolimus-based Immunosuppression

被引:3
作者
Peddi, V. Ram [1 ]
Marder, Bradley [2 ]
Gaite, Luis [3 ]
Oberholzer, Jose [4 ]
Goldberg, Ryan [5 ]
Pearson, Thomas [6 ]
Yang, Harold [7 ]
Allamassey, Lisa [8 ]
Polinsky, Martin [9 ]
Formica, Richard N. [10 ]
机构
[1] Calif Pacific Med Ctr, Dept Transplantat, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Colorado Kidney Care, Div Transplant Res, Denver, CO USA
[3] Clin Nefrol, Secc Hepatol, Santa Fe, Argentina
[4] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Div Transplant Surg, Charlottesville, VA USA
[5] St Barnabas Hosp, Renal & Pancreas Transplant Div, Livingston, NJ USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Emory Transplant Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr Pinnacle, Dept Surg, Harrisburg, PA USA
[8] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Braine Lalleud, Belgium
[9] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ USA
[10] Yale Sch Med, Nephrol Sect, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
PHASE-III; CLASSIFICATION; CYCLOSPORINE; OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; REGIMENS;
D O I
10.1097/TXD.0000000000001419
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background.Compared with calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression, belatacept (BELA)-based treatment has been associated with better renal function but higher acute rejection rates. This phase 2 study (NCT02137239) compared the antirejection efficacy of BELA plus everolimus (EVL) with tacrolimus (TAC) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), each following lymphocyte-depleting induction and rapid corticosteroid withdrawal. Methods.Patients who were de novo renal transplant recipients seropositive for Epstein-Barr virus were randomized to receive BELA+EVL or TAC+MMF maintenance therapy after rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction and up to 7 d of corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection at month 6. Results.Because of an unanticipated BELA supply constraint, enrollment was prematurely terminated at 68 patients, of whom 58 were randomized and transplanted (intention-to-treat [ITT] population: n = 26, BELA+EVL; n = 32, TAC+MMF). However, 25 patients received BELA+EVL, and 33 received TAC+MMF (modified ITT population). In the ITT population, the 6-mo biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 7.7% versus 9.4% in the BELA+EVL versus TAC+MMF group. The corresponding 24-mo biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 19.2% versus 12.5% in the ITT population and 16.0% versus 15.2% in the mITT population; all events were Banff severity grade <= IIA and similar between groups. One patient in each group experienced graft loss unrelated to acute rejection. The 24-mo mean unadjusted estimated glomerular filtration rates were 71.8 versus 68.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the BELA+EVL versus TAC+MMF groups. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was reported for 1 patient in each group. No deaths or unexpected adverse events were observed. Conclusions.A steroid-free maintenance regimen of BELA+EVL may be associated with biopsy-proven acute rejection rates comparable to TAC+MMF.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Calcineurin Inhibitors: 40 Years Later, Can't Live Without [J].
Azzi, Jamil R. ;
Sayegh, Mohamed H. ;
Mallat, Samir G. .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 191 (12) :5785-5791
[2]   Costimulatory blockade with mTor inhibition abrogates effector T-cell responses allowing regulatory T-cell survival in renal transplantation [J].
Bestard, Oriol ;
Cassis, Linda ;
Cruzado, Josep M. ;
Torras, Joan ;
Franquesa, Marcella ;
Gil-Vernet, Salvador ;
Lucia, Marc ;
Grinyo, Josep M. .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 24 (05) :451-460
[3]   De novo donor-specific antibodies in belatacept-treated vs cyclosporine-treated kidney-transplant recipients: Post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT studies [J].
Bray, R. A. ;
Gebel, H. M. ;
Townsend, R. ;
Roberts, M. E. ;
Polinsky, M. ;
Yang, L. ;
Meier-Kriesche, H. -U. ;
Larsen, C. P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 (07) :1783-1789
[4]   Posttransplant reduction in preexisting donor-specific antibody levels after belatacept- versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression: Post hoc analyses of BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT [J].
Bray, R. A. ;
Gebel, H. M. ;
Townsend, R. ;
Roberts, M. E. ;
Polinsky, M. ;
Yang, L. ;
Meier-Kriesche, H. -U. ;
Larsen, C. P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 (07) :1774-1782
[5]   mTOR Inhibitor Therapy Diminishes Circulating CD8+ CD28- Effector Memory T Cells and Improves Allograft Inflammation in Belatacept-refractory Renal Allograft Rejection [J].
Castro-Rojas, Cyd M. ;
Godarova, Alzbeta ;
Shi, Tiffany ;
Hummel, Sarah A. ;
Shields, Adele ;
Tremblay, Simon ;
Alloway, Rita R. ;
Jordan, Michael B. ;
Woodle, E. Steve ;
Hildeman, David A. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 104 (05) :1058-1069
[6]   Immunosuppressive minimization with mTOR inhibitors and belatacept [J].
Diekmann, Fritz .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 (08) :921-927
[7]   Long-Term Outcomes in Belatacept- Versus Cyclosporine-Treated Recipients of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys: Final Results From BENEFIT-EXT, a Phase III Randomized Study [J].
Durrbach, A. ;
Pestana, J. M. ;
Florman, S. ;
del Carmen Rial, M. ;
Rostaing, L. ;
Kuypers, D. ;
Matas, A. ;
Wekerle, T. ;
Polinsky, M. ;
Meier-Kriesche, H. U. ;
Munier, S. ;
Grinyo, J. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 (11) :3192-3201
[8]   A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplants from Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT-EXT Study) [J].
Durrbach, A. ;
Pestana, J. M. ;
Pearson, T. ;
Vincenti, F. ;
Garcia, V. D. ;
Campistol, J. ;
del Carmen Rial, M. ;
Florman, S. ;
Block, A. ;
Di Russo, G. ;
Xing, J. ;
Garg, P. ;
Grinyo, J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 10 (03) :547-557
[9]   Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in renal transplantation [J].
Ekberg, Henrik .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 86 (06) :761-767
[10]   CD57+ CD4 T Cells Underlie Belatacept-Resistant Allograft Rejection [J].
Espinosa, J. ;
Herr, F. ;
Tharp, G. ;
Bosinger, S. ;
Song, M. ;
Farris, A. B., III ;
George, R. ;
Cheeseman, J. ;
Stempora, L. ;
Townsend, R. ;
Durrbach, A. ;
Kirk, A. D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 (04) :1102-1112