Hierarchical disjoint principal component analysis

被引:3
作者
Cavicchia, Carlo [1 ]
Vichi, Maurizio [2 ]
Zaccaria, Giorgia [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Econometr Inst, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Stat Sci, Rome, Italy
关键词
Dimension reduction; Hierarchical models; Parsimonious trees; Reflective models; Formative models; HIGHER-ORDER FACTORS; STATISTICAL VARIABLES; GENERAL INTELLIGENCE; CAUSAL INDICATORS; PERSONALITY; MODEL; COMPOSITE; COMPLEX; PCA;
D O I
10.1007/s10182-022-00458-4
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Dimension reduction, by means of Principal Component Analysis (PCA), is often employed to obtain a reduced set of components preserving the largest possible part of the total variance of the observed variables. Several methodologies have been proposed either to improve the interpretation of PCA results (e.g., by means of orthogonal, oblique rotations, shrinkage methods), or to model oblique components or factors with a hierarchical structure, such as in Bi-factor and High-Order Factor analyses. In this paper, we propose a new methodology, called Hierarchical Disjoint Principal Component Analysis (HierDPCA), that aims at building a hierarchy of disjoint principal components of maximum variance associated with disjoint groups of observed variables, from Q up to a unique, general one. HierDPCA also allows choosing the type of the relationship among disjoint principal components of two sequential levels, from the lowest upwards, by testing the component correlation per level and changing from a reflective to a formative approach when this correlation turns out to be not statistically significant. The methodology is formulated in a semi-parametric least-squares framework and a coordinate descent algorithm is proposed to estimate the model parameters. A simulation study and two real applications are illustrated to highlight the empirical properties of the proposed methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 574
页数:38
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Sparsest factor analysis for clustering variables: a matrix decomposition approach [J].
Adachi, Kohei ;
Trendafilov, Nickolay T. .
ADVANCES IN DATA ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION, 2018, 12 (03) :559-585
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Encyclopedia of statistical sciences
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Revue de statistique applique
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Classification
[5]  
Becker W., 2018, EXPLORING ASEM SUSTA
[6]  
Blalock H.M., 1964, Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research
[7]   CONVENTIONAL WISDOM ON MEASUREMENT - A STRUCTURAL EQUATION PERSPECTIVE [J].
BOLLEN, K ;
LENNOX, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (02) :305-314
[8]  
Bollen K., 2001, International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences, DOI DOI 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00709-9
[9]  
Bollen K.A., 1989, STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781118619179, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179]
[10]   Three Cs in Measurement Models: Causal Indicators, Composite Indicators, and Covariates [J].
Bollen, Kenneth A. ;
Bauldry, Shawn .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 16 (03) :265-284