Learning profiles and their relation to the experiences of learning generic skills at the end of the first year of university study

被引:2
作者
Hyytinen, Heidi [1 ]
Tuononen, Tarja [1 ]
Haarala-Muhonen, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Educ Sci, Ctr Univ Teaching & Learning, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
approaches to learning; learning profiles; generic skills; higher education; critical thinking; communication; collaboration; GRADUATES PERCEPTIONS; CRITICAL THINKING; SELF-EFFICACY; WORKING LIFE; STUDENTS; TRANSITION; SCIENCE; ENVIRONMENT; COMPETENCES; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2023.1330898
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
University students' approaches to learning and generic skills have important consequences for studying and success in higher education. However, person-oriented research, which explores how students with different learning profiles evaluate their learning of individual generic skills, has not been the core interest of previous studies. This study investigates the learning profiles of university students (N = 901) in two disciplines and their relations to the experiences of learning critical thinking, collaboration and communication at the end of the first study year. The interrelations of the variables were analyzed with correlations and Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) estimating auxiliary variable relation. LPA yielded three learning profile groups that differed from each other in their approaches to learning: unreflective, dissonant and deep-organized, which, respectively, comprised 7, 58 and 35% of the sample. The experiences of learning generic skills of the three learning profiles varied. The comparison of the profiles showed that students representing the deep-organized profile scored highest on all measured generic skills compared to the other two learning profiles.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[11]  
Braun E., 2016, THEORY METHOD HIGHER, V2, P47, DOI [10.1108/S2056-375220160000002003, DOI 10.1108/S2056-375220160000002003]
[12]   Self-rated competences questionnaires from a design perspective [J].
Braun, Edith ;
Woodley, Alan ;
Richardson, John T. E. ;
Leidner, Bernhard .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2012, 7 (01) :1-18
[13]  
Costello AB., 2019, PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT, V10, P1, DOI [10.7275/jyj1-4868, DOI 10.7275/JYJ1-4868]
[14]   From senior student to novice worker: learning trajectories in political science, psychology and mechanical engineering [J].
Dahlgren, Madeleine Abrandt ;
Hult, Hakan ;
Dahlgren, Lars Owe ;
af Segerstad, Helene Hard ;
Johansson, Kristina .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 31 (05) :569-586
[15]  
Drennan L., 2022, J LANG TEACH, V56, P1, DOI [10.56285/jltVol56iss1a5411, DOI 10.56285/JLTVOL56ISS1A5411]
[16]   Does explicit teaching of critical thinking improve critical thinking skills of English language learners in higher education? A critical review of causal evidence [J].
El Soufi, Nada ;
See, Beng Huat .
STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2019, 60 :140-162
[17]   The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories [J].
Entwistle, N ;
McCune, V .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2004, 16 (04) :325-345
[18]  
Entwistle N., 2003, Powerful learning environments : unravelling basic components and dimensions, P89
[19]  
Evens M., 2013, International Journal of Higher Education, V2, P139, DOI DOI 10.5430/IJHE.V2N3P139
[20]  
Finnish National Board on Research Integrity, 2019, GUIDELINES ETHICAL R