A deep learning analysis of stroke onset time prediction and comparison to DWI-FLAIR mismatch

被引:2
|
作者
Akay, Ela Marie Z. [1 ,6 ]
Rieger, Jana [1 ]
Schoettler, Ricardo [1 ]
Behland, Jonas [1 ]
Schymczyk, Raphael [1 ]
Khalil, Ahmed A. [2 ,3 ]
Galinovic, Ivana [2 ]
Sobesky, Jan [2 ]
Fiebach, Jochen B. [2 ]
Madai, Vince I. [4 ,5 ]
Hilbert, Adam [1 ]
Frey, Dietmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Charite Lab Artificial Intelligence Med CLAIM, Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Ctr Stroke Res Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Dept Neurol, Leipzig, Germany
[4] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin Inst Hlth BIH, QUEST Ctr Responsible Res, Berlin, Germany
[5] Birmingham City Univ, Fac Comp Engn & Built Environm, Sch Comp & Digital Technol, Birmingham, England
[6] Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Acute ischemic stroke; Machine learning; Decision support; Computer aided; Magnetic resonance imaging; Wake up stroke; DWI-FLAIR-mismatch; Precision medicine; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Fluid attenuated inversion recovery; Cerebrovascular accident; Deep learning; ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE; HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS; INTRAVENOUS ALTEPLASE; WAKE-UP; IDENTIFICATION; THROMBOLYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103544
中图分类号
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100207 ;
摘要
Introduction: When time since stroke onset is unknown, DWI-FLAIR mismatch rating is an established technique for patient stratification. A visible DWI lesion without corresponding parenchymal hyperintensity on FLAIR suggests time since onset of under 4.5 h and thus a potential benefit from intravenous thrombolysis. To improve accuracy and availability of the mismatch concept, deep learning might be able to augment human rating and support decision-making in these cases.Methods: We used unprocessed DWI and coregistered FLAIR imaging data to train a deep learning model to predict dichotomized time since ischemic stroke onset. We analyzed the performance of Group Convolutional Neural Networks compared to other deep learning methods. Unlabeled imaging data was used for pre-training. Prediction performance of the best deep learning model was compared to the performance of four independent junior and senior raters. Additionally, in cases deemed indeterminable by human raters, model ratings were used to augment human performance. Post-hoc gradient-based explanations were analyzed to gain insights into model predictions.Results: Our best predictive model performed comparably to human raters. Using model ratings in cases deemed indeterminable by human raters improved rating accuracy and interrater agreement for junior and senior ratings. Post-hoc explainability analyses showed that the model localized stroke lesions to derive predictions. Discussion: Our analysis shows that deep learning based clinical decision support has the potential to improve the accessibility of the DWI-FLAIR mismatch concept by supporting patient stratification.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Salvage of the PWI/DWI mismatch up to 48h from stroke onset leads to favorable clinical outcome
    Ma, H.
    Wright, P.
    Allport, L.
    Phan, T. G.
    Churilov, L.
    Ly, J.
    Zavala, J. A.
    Arakawa, S.
    Campbell, B.
    Davis, S. M.
    Donnan, G. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2015, 10 (04) : 565 - 570
  • [42] Prediction of Stroke Onset Is Improved by Relative Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery and Perfusion Imaging Compared to the Visual Diffusion-Weighted Imaging/Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch
    Wouters, Anke
    Dupont, Patrick
    Norrving, Bo
    Laage, Rico
    Thomalla, Goetz
    Albers, Gregory W.
    Thijs, Vincent
    Lemmens, Robin
    STROKE, 2016, 47 (10) : 2559 - 2564
  • [43] Ischemic stroke outcome prediction with diversity features from whole brain tissue using deep learning network
    Yang, Yingjian
    Guo, Yingwei
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [44] Application of FLAIR Vascular Hyperintensity-DWI Mismatch in Ischemic Stroke Depending on Semi-Quantitative DWI-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score
    Song, Lei
    Lyu, Cui
    Shen, Guiquan
    Guo, Tingting
    Wang, Jiangtao
    Wang, Wanbi
    Qiu, Xiaoming
    Lerner, Alexander
    Wintermark, Max
    Gao, Bo
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [45] Machine learning and deep learning algorithms in stroke medicine: a systematic review of hemorrhagic transformation prediction models
    Issaiy, Mahbod
    Zarei, Diana
    Kolahi, Shahriar
    Liebeskind, David S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2025, 272 (01)
  • [46] Relative FLAIR Signal Intensities over Time in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Two Methods
    Ostwaldt, Ann-Christin
    Galinovic, Ivana
    Hotter, Benjamin
    Grittner, Ulrike
    Nolte, Christian H.
    Audebert, Heinrich J.
    Villringer, Kersten
    Fiebach, Jochen B.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2015, 25 (06) : 964 - 968
  • [47] Explainable artificial intelligence for stroke prediction through comparison of deep learning and machine learning models
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    Afshari, Lida
    Moulaei, Reza
    Sabet, Babak
    Mousavi, Seyed Mohammad
    Afrash, Mohammad Reza
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [48] DWI of the rectum with deep learning reconstruction: comparison of PROPELLER, reduced FOV, and conventional DWI.
    Matsumoto, Shohei
    Tsuboyama, Takahiro
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Kaketaka, Koki
    Wakayama, Tetsuya
    Wang, Xinzeng
    Nakamoto, Atsushi
    Ota, Takashi
    Fukui, Hideyuki
    Honda, Toru
    Kiso, Kengo
    Oba, Koji
    Tomiyama, Noriyuki
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [49] Comparison of CT and DWI Findings in Ischemic Stroke Patients within 3 Hours of Onset
    Mitomi, Mutsumi
    Kimura, Kazumi
    Aoki, Junya
    Iguchi, Yasuyuki
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2014, 23 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [50] Development and external validation of a stability machine learning model to identify wake-up stroke onset time from MRI
    Jiang, Liang
    Wang, Siyu
    Ai, Zhongping
    Shen, Tingwen
    Zhang, Hong
    Duan, Shaofeng
    Chen, Yu-Chen
    Yin, Xindao
    Sun, Jun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (06) : 3661 - 3669