Intellectual disabilities teaching for medical students: a scoping review

被引:3
作者
Towson, Georgia [1 ]
Daley, Stephanie [1 ]
Banerjee, Sube [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Ctr Dementia Studies, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Trafford Bldg,Room 101, Falmer BN1 9RY, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Nottingham, England
关键词
Learning disabilities; Intellectual disabilities; Education; Medical students; REHABILITATION; IMPRESSIONS; EXPERIENCE; EDUCATORS; PATIENT; PEOPLE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-023-04766-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundPeople with intellectual disabilities are a marginalized group whose health experiences and outcomes are poor. Lack of skill and knowledge in the healthcare workforce is a contributing factor. In England, there is a new legislative requirement for mandatory intellectual disability training to be given to the existing healthcare workforce, including doctors. There is a lack of evidence about effective models of educational delivery of such training in medical schools. We undertook a scoping review to assess the range of intellectual disabilities educational interventions and their effectiveness.MethodsWe included any study from 1980 onwards which reported an educational intervention on intellectual disability, or intellectual disability and autism, for medical students from any year group. Databases searched included PUBMED, ERIC, Scopus and Web of Science as well as searches of grey literature and hand searching two journals (Medical Education and Journal of Learning Disabilities). 2,020 records were extracted, with 1,992 excluded from initial screening, and a further 12 excluded from full-text review, leaving 16 studies for inclusion. Data was extracted, quality assessed, and findings collated using narrative analysis.ResultsWe found a variety of intervention types: classroom-based teaching, simulation, placement, home visits, and panel discussions. There was substantial variation in content. Most studies involved lived experience input. Across studies, interventions had different learning outcomes which made it difficult to assess effectiveness. Overall study quality was poor, with high use of non-validated measures, making further assessment of effectiveness problematic.ConclusionsThere is a need for more consistency in intervention design, and higher quality evaluation of teaching in this area. Our review has drawn attention to the variety in teaching on this topic area and further research should focus on updating this review as curriculum changes are implemented over time.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies [J].
Grant, Maria J. ;
Booth, Andrew .
HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 2009, 26 (02) :91-108
[12]  
Hall I., 1996, Psychiatric Bulletin, V20, P429
[13]   Conducting a best evidence systematic review. Part 1: From idea to data coding. BEME Guide No. 13 [J].
Hammick, Marilyn ;
Dornan, Timothy ;
Steinert, Yvonne .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2010, 32 (01) :3-15
[14]  
Harden RM, 1999, MED TEACH, V21, P553, DOI 10.1080/01421599978960
[15]  
HARPER DC, 1992, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V107, P297
[16]  
Harwood I, 2014, Adv Mental Health Intellect Disabil.
[17]  
Henry D, 1996, MENT RETARD, V34, P149
[18]   From patient to instructor: Honoring the lived experience [J].
Jaworsky, Denise ;
Chew, Derek ;
Thorne, Julie ;
Morin, Carly ;
McNaughton, Nancy ;
Downer, Greg ;
Paddock, Suzanne ;
Lees, Rick ;
Rachlis, Anita .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (04) :339-340
[19]   Interprofessional Education in Canada: Addressing Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes Concerning Intellectual Disability for Future Healthcare Professionals [J].
Jones, Jessica ;
McQueen, Meg ;
Lowe, Samantha ;
Minnes, Patricia ;
Rischke, Alexis .
JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2015, 12 (03) :172-180
[20]   Teaching medical students about children with disabilities in a rural setting in a school [J].
Jones P. ;
Donald M. .
BMC Medical Education, 7 (1)