Life cycle assessment of ultra-tall wind turbine towers comparing concrete additive manufacturing to conventional manufacturing

被引:19
|
作者
Jones, Kathryn E. S. [1 ]
Li, Mo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, E4145 Engn Gateway, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Additive manufacturing; 3D printed concrete; Steel; Environmental impacts; Wind turbine tower; Life cycle assessment; FOUNDATIONS; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137709
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wind power is a quickly growing renewable energy resource within the continental United States and is expected to continue increasing as more wind farms are installed onshore and offshore. As a part of this growth, larger turbines benefit from economies of scale from taller towers. However, the development of ultra-tall wind turbine towers is hindered by transportation restrictions which limit the diameter and weight of the prefabricated tower sections. One proposed solution to this problem is to employ concrete additive manufacturing to build ultra-tall wind turbine towers on-site. To evaluate the potential environmental impacts of this approach, this study per-formed a life cycle assessment comparing four prototype 7.5-MW wind turbine towers designed with a height of 140 m: a conventional tubular steel tower assembled using bolted connections, two 3D printed concrete towers additively manufactured on-site with normal-strength (35 MPa) or high-strength (78 MPa) concrete, and a 3D cast concrete tower with normal strength (35 MPa) concrete cast into concrete formworks additively manu-factured with high-strength (78 MPa) concrete. The 3D cast concrete tower segments are manufactured off-site and assembled on-site. The life cycle assessment examined the impacts of differences in materials inventory, structural designs, manufacturing methods, maintenance schedules, and end-of-life options for the four towers. The results indicate that the material production stage dominates, contributing over 92% of the total CO2 emissions and 67-93% of the energy consumption of the four towers. Compared with the steel tower, the normal-strength 3D printed concrete tower has 23% lower total life cycle CO2 emissions but 29% higher energy con-sumption; the high-strength 3D printed concrete tower has 16% higher life cycle CO2 emissions and 64% higher energy consumption. Parametric studies were also conducted to examine the effects of cement content by weight, distance from the concrete plant to the tower construction site, the number of tower sections, rated tower life, and tower end-of-life recycling rate. The results indicate that reducing cement content in 3D printed concrete such as by incorporating waste or recycled materials can significantly reduce the life cycle environmental im-pacts of ultra-tall turbine towers.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comprehensive review of 3D printed concrete, life cycle assessment, AI and ML models: Materials, engineered properties and techniques for additive manufacturing
    Khan, Mirza Aamish Hassan
    Ahmed, Aayzaz
    Ali, Tariq
    Qureshi, Muhammad Zeeshan
    Islam, Saiful
    Ahmed, Hawreen
    Ajwad, Ali
    Khan, Muhammad Adil
    SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2025, 43
  • [42] Comparative environmental impact assessment of additive-subtractive manufacturing processes for Inconel 625: A life cycle analysis
    Maheshwari, Pratham
    Khanna, Navneet
    Hegab, Hussien
    Singh, Gurminder
    Sarikaya, Murat
    SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 37
  • [43] Comparing environmental sustainability of additive manufacturing and investment casting: Life cycle assessment of Aluminium LM04 (Al-Si5-Cu3)
    Yadav, Alok
    Garg, Rajiv Kumar
    Sachdeva, Anish
    Qureshi, Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2025, 923
  • [44] Environmental impacts of conventional and additive manufacturing for the production of Ti-6Al-4V knee implant: a life cycle approach
    Lyons, Ronan
    Newell, Anthony
    Ghadimi, Pezhman
    Papakostas, Nikolaos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 112 (3-4): : 787 - 801
  • [45] Environmental impacts of conventional and additive manufacturing for the production of Ti-6Al-4V knee implant: a life cycle approach
    Ronan Lyons
    Anthony Newell
    Pezhman Ghadimi
    Nikolaos Papakostas
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 112 : 787 - 801
  • [46] Gate-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Printed AlSi10Mg Laser Powder Bed Fusion Jobs in Additive Manufacturing Factories
    Cozzolino, Ersilia
    Papa, Ilaria
    Astarita, Antonello
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2025,
  • [47] Life cycle assessment of wire plus arc additive manufacturing compared to green sand casting and CNC milling in stainless steel
    Bekker, Anne C. M.
    Verlinden, Jouke C.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 177 : 438 - 447
  • [48] Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste-based geopolymers suited for use in 3-dimensional additive manufacturing
    Mir, Namra
    Khan, Shoukat Alim
    Kul, Anil
    Sahin, Oguzhan
    Sahmaran, Mustafa
    Koc, Muammer
    CLEANER ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10
  • [49] Effects on sustainability by Redesign of a 1° stage gas turbine nozzle ring from Investment Casting to Additive Manufacturing: A Life Cycle Environmental Impact comparison
    Fantaccione, Luca
    Serra, Angela
    Buia, Giulio
    Bartocci, Pietro
    Gandini, Sergio
    Fantozzi, Francesco
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME TURBO EXPO 2022: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, GT2022, VOL 2, 2022,
  • [50] Emergy-based life-cycle assessment (Em-LCA) for sustainability assessment: a case study of laser additive manufacturing versus CNC machining
    Jiang, Qiuhong
    Liu, Zhichao
    Li, Tao
    Cong, Weilong
    Zhang, Hong-Chao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 102 (9-12): : 4109 - 4120