Life cycle assessment of ultra-tall wind turbine towers comparing concrete additive manufacturing to conventional manufacturing

被引:19
|
作者
Jones, Kathryn E. S. [1 ]
Li, Mo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, E4145 Engn Gateway, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Additive manufacturing; 3D printed concrete; Steel; Environmental impacts; Wind turbine tower; Life cycle assessment; FOUNDATIONS; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137709
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wind power is a quickly growing renewable energy resource within the continental United States and is expected to continue increasing as more wind farms are installed onshore and offshore. As a part of this growth, larger turbines benefit from economies of scale from taller towers. However, the development of ultra-tall wind turbine towers is hindered by transportation restrictions which limit the diameter and weight of the prefabricated tower sections. One proposed solution to this problem is to employ concrete additive manufacturing to build ultra-tall wind turbine towers on-site. To evaluate the potential environmental impacts of this approach, this study per-formed a life cycle assessment comparing four prototype 7.5-MW wind turbine towers designed with a height of 140 m: a conventional tubular steel tower assembled using bolted connections, two 3D printed concrete towers additively manufactured on-site with normal-strength (35 MPa) or high-strength (78 MPa) concrete, and a 3D cast concrete tower with normal strength (35 MPa) concrete cast into concrete formworks additively manu-factured with high-strength (78 MPa) concrete. The 3D cast concrete tower segments are manufactured off-site and assembled on-site. The life cycle assessment examined the impacts of differences in materials inventory, structural designs, manufacturing methods, maintenance schedules, and end-of-life options for the four towers. The results indicate that the material production stage dominates, contributing over 92% of the total CO2 emissions and 67-93% of the energy consumption of the four towers. Compared with the steel tower, the normal-strength 3D printed concrete tower has 23% lower total life cycle CO2 emissions but 29% higher energy con-sumption; the high-strength 3D printed concrete tower has 16% higher life cycle CO2 emissions and 64% higher energy consumption. Parametric studies were also conducted to examine the effects of cement content by weight, distance from the concrete plant to the tower construction site, the number of tower sections, rated tower life, and tower end-of-life recycling rate. The results indicate that reducing cement content in 3D printed concrete such as by incorporating waste or recycled materials can significantly reduce the life cycle environmental im-pacts of ultra-tall turbine towers.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparative assessment of energy demand and life cycle costs for additive- and subtractive-based manufacturing approaches
    Ingarao, Giuseppe
    Priarone, Paolo C.
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2020, 56 : 1219 - 1229
  • [32] Automating life cycle assessment for additive manufacturing with machine learning: Framework design, dataset buildup, and a case study
    Naser, Ahmed Z.
    Defersha, Fantahun
    Xu, Xun
    Yang, Sheng
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2023, 71 : 504 - 526
  • [33] Ex-ante life cycle assessment of directed energy deposition based additive manufacturing: A comparative gearbox production case study
    Santiago-Herrera, Mario
    Igos, Elorri
    Alegre, J. M.
    Martel-Martin, Sonia
    Barros, Rocio
    SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 39
  • [34] Specific energy consumption based comparison of distributed additive and conventional manufacturing: From cradle to gate partial life cycle analysis
    Tran, Casey
    Duenas, Laura
    Misra, Satyajayant
    Chaitanya, Vimal
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 425
  • [35] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of SLS and mFFF Additive Manufacturing Techniques for the Production of a Metal Specimen
    Presciutti, Andrea
    Gebennini, Elisa
    Liberti, Federica
    Nanni, Francesca
    Bragaglia, Mario
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [36] A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies
    Huntzinger, Deborah N.
    Eatmon, Thomas D.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (07) : 668 - 675
  • [37] Sustainable strategies for reducing environmental impact in concrete block manufacturing: a comprehensive life cycle assessment
    Ashokan, Anbuchezian
    Jaganathan, Sivakumar
    Rajendran, Silambarasan
    Dhairiyasamy, Ratchagaraja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2024, 21 (01) : 187 - 204
  • [38] Life cycle assessment in additive manufacturing of copper alloys-comparison between laser and electron beam
    Raute, Julius
    Beret, Alexander
    Biegler, Max
    Rethmeier, Michael
    WELDING IN THE WORLD, 2024, 68 (12) : 3169 - 3176
  • [39] Addressing Hazardous Implications of Additive Manufacturing Complementing Life Cycle Assessment with a Framework for Evaluating Direct Human Health and Environmental Impacts
    Bours, Justin
    Adzima, Brian
    Gladwin, Susan
    Cabral, Julia
    Mau, Serena
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 : S25 - S36
  • [40] Life cycle cost, energy, and carbon emissions of molds for precast concrete: Exploring the impacts of material choices and additive manufacturing
    Armstrong, Kristina O.
    Kamath, Dipti
    Zhao, Xianhui
    Rencheck, Mitchell L.
    Tekinalp, Halil
    Korey, Matthew
    Hun, Diana
    Ozcan, Soydan
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 197