Life cycle assessment of ultra-tall wind turbine towers comparing concrete additive manufacturing to conventional manufacturing

被引:19
|
作者
Jones, Kathryn E. S. [1 ]
Li, Mo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, E4145 Engn Gateway, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Additive manufacturing; 3D printed concrete; Steel; Environmental impacts; Wind turbine tower; Life cycle assessment; FOUNDATIONS; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137709
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wind power is a quickly growing renewable energy resource within the continental United States and is expected to continue increasing as more wind farms are installed onshore and offshore. As a part of this growth, larger turbines benefit from economies of scale from taller towers. However, the development of ultra-tall wind turbine towers is hindered by transportation restrictions which limit the diameter and weight of the prefabricated tower sections. One proposed solution to this problem is to employ concrete additive manufacturing to build ultra-tall wind turbine towers on-site. To evaluate the potential environmental impacts of this approach, this study per-formed a life cycle assessment comparing four prototype 7.5-MW wind turbine towers designed with a height of 140 m: a conventional tubular steel tower assembled using bolted connections, two 3D printed concrete towers additively manufactured on-site with normal-strength (35 MPa) or high-strength (78 MPa) concrete, and a 3D cast concrete tower with normal strength (35 MPa) concrete cast into concrete formworks additively manu-factured with high-strength (78 MPa) concrete. The 3D cast concrete tower segments are manufactured off-site and assembled on-site. The life cycle assessment examined the impacts of differences in materials inventory, structural designs, manufacturing methods, maintenance schedules, and end-of-life options for the four towers. The results indicate that the material production stage dominates, contributing over 92% of the total CO2 emissions and 67-93% of the energy consumption of the four towers. Compared with the steel tower, the normal-strength 3D printed concrete tower has 23% lower total life cycle CO2 emissions but 29% higher energy con-sumption; the high-strength 3D printed concrete tower has 16% higher life cycle CO2 emissions and 64% higher energy consumption. Parametric studies were also conducted to examine the effects of cement content by weight, distance from the concrete plant to the tower construction site, the number of tower sections, rated tower life, and tower end-of-life recycling rate. The results indicate that reducing cement content in 3D printed concrete such as by incorporating waste or recycled materials can significantly reduce the life cycle environmental im-pacts of ultra-tall turbine towers.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Review of Conventional versus Additive Manufacturing for Metals: Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Analysis
    Mecheter, Asma
    Tarlochan, Faris
    Kucukvar, Murat
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (16)
  • [22] Life cycle assessment of metal products: A comparison between wire arc additive manufacturing and CNC milling
    Reis, Rafaela C.
    Kokare, Samruddha
    Oliveira, J. P.
    Matias, Joco. C. O.
    Godina, Radu
    ADVANCES IN INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2023, 6
  • [23] Using life cycle assessment to determine if high utilization is the dominant force for sustainable polymer additive manufacturing
    Shi, Yuan
    Faludi, Jeremy
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 35
  • [24] Comparative job production based life cycle assessment of conventional and additive manufacturing assisted investment casting of aluminium: A case study
    Prakash, Chander
    Singh, Sunpreet
    Kopperi, Harishankar
    Ramakrihna, Seeram
    Mohan, S. Venkata
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 289
  • [25] Life Cycle Assessment of Metal Products Produced by Additive Manufacturing: A Metal Mold Case Study
    Stieberova, Barbora
    Broumova, Michaela
    Matousek, Michal
    Zilka, Miroslav
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (16): : 5163 - 5174
  • [26] Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: A review
    Vieira, Darli Rodrigues
    Calmon, Joao Luiz
    Coelho, Felipe Zanellato
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2016, 124 : 656 - 666
  • [27] Toward automated life cycle assessment for additive manufacturing: A systematic review of influential parameters and framework design
    Naser, Ahmed Z.
    Defersha, Fantahun
    Pei, Eujin
    Zhao, Yaoyao Fiona
    Yang, Sheng
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 41 : 253 - 274
  • [28] Additive manufacturing in green supply chains: A parametric model for life cycle assessment and cost
    Manco, Pasquale
    Caterino, Mario
    Rinaldi, Marta
    Fera, Marcello
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 36 : 463 - 478
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of filament production in distributed plastic recycling via additive manufacturing
    Caceres-Mendoza, Cristian
    Santander-Tapia, Pavlo
    Sanchez, Fabio A. Cruz
    Troussier, Nadege
    Camargo, Mauricio
    Boudaoud, Hakim
    CLEANER WASTE SYSTEMS, 2023, 5
  • [30] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of the Manufacturing of Conventional and Innovative Aerators: A Case Study in China
    Hou, Haochen
    Wang, Haiheng
    Ren, Anqi
    Zhang, Yun
    Liu, Ying
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)