Examining the Effects of Integrated Science and Literacy Instruction on Second Graders' Reading Comprehension, Reading Motivation, and Ability to Write Science Informational Texts

被引:0
作者
Clark, Sarah K. [1 ,2 ]
Brandt, Lorilynn B. [1 ]
Joyner, Elise [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, 205 MCKB, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
REGULATED STRATEGY-DEVELOPMENT; STRUGGLING YOUNG WRITERS; DISCIPLINARY LITERACY; KNOWLEDGE; BOOKS; INTERVENTIONS; ACHIEVEMENT; ENGAGEMENT; CLASSROOM; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1080/10573569.2023.2190320
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This quasi-experimental study aimed to examine content-area literacy instruction in comparison to a science-infused literacy instruction (SILI) to determine how these two approaches influenced 2nd grade students' ability to read and write science informational text and the students' attitude and motivation towards reading. After professional development, five teachers taught their classes twelve thematic lessons designed using either the content-area literacy (N = 37) or the SILI (N = 40) instruction to 2nd grade students. Teachers in both groups implemented thematic lessons that taught the life cycle of plants and included interactive read-alouds, graphic organizers, watching time lapse videos of plant growth, and reading digital texts independently and in small groups to support students in building the content knowledge and vocabulary necessary to write science informational texts. Students in the SILI group also participated in hands-on science activities including planting seeds and documenting plant growth, exploring the parts of a live basil plant, and taking walks outdoors to observe plants at various stages of the plant life cycle. Lessons took place over four weeks to assist students in acquiring science content knowledge so as to transfer this knowledge into science informational texts and to determine the influence of both instructional approaches on reading comprehension and reading attitude and motivation. Findings resulted in the content-area literacy instruction producing higher and statistically significant reading comprehension and writing rubric scores than the SILI group with medium effect sizes reported. The SILI group produced higher reading attitude and motivation scores, but these results were not statistically significant. Implications for both early childhood science and literacy classroom instruction as well as multiple implications for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 285
页数:18
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Alexander PA., 2003, ED RES, V32, P10, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X032008010, 10.3102/0013189X032008010]
[2]  
Annie E., 2010, EARLY WARNING! Why reading by the end of third grade matters
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Common core state standards
[4]   "Hey! Today I Will Tell You about the Water Cycle!": Variations of Language and Organizational Features in Third-Grade Science Explanation Writing [J].
Avalos, Mary A. ;
Zisselsberger, Margarita Gomez ;
Gort, Mileidis ;
Secada, Walter G. .
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 2017, 118 (01) :149-176
[5]  
Berman Jeffrey., 2009, DEATH CLASSROOM WRIT
[6]  
Berninger V.W., 2006, Handbook of writing research, P96, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11145-008-9121-2
[7]  
Cervetti G.N., 2006, LINKING SCI LITERACY, P221
[8]  
Cervetti G. N., 2021, LANG ARTS, V98, P340, DOI DOI 10.58680/LA202131333
[9]  
Chall J.S., 2003, AM EDUC, V27, P14
[10]   Using Disciplinary Literacy to Teach Children to Write Science Informational Text [J].
Clark, Sarah K. ;
Smith, Leigh K. ;
Judd, Emma ;
Rosdahl, Victoria .
READING PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 42 (05) :455-483