Effectiveness of spinal manipulation in addition to pharmacological treatment in fibromyalgia: A blinded randomized trial

被引:1
作者
Ince, Bugra [1 ,3 ]
Kara, Mert [1 ]
Erdem, Irem [1 ]
Yurdakul, Ozan Volkan [1 ]
Erden, Tunay [2 ]
Aydin, Teoman [1 ]
机构
[1] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Acibadem Fulya Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Bozyaka Training & Res Hosp, Izmir Med Fac, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Bahar,Saim Cikrikci Cd 59,Karabaglar, TR-35170 Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
MANUAL THERAPY; PAIN; DISEASE; CRITERIA; QUALITY; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.12953
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BackgroundIt has been suggested that spinal manipulation may alter sensorimotor integration in the central nervous system and therefore may be used to treat central sensitization syndromes. ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of spinal manipulation in addition to pharmacological treatment in patients with fibromyalgia. DesignA single-center, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial with three parallel arms SettingOutpatient clinics at a tertiary health care facility. ParticipantsFemale patients aged 18-55 years receiving pharmacological treatment. InterventionsSpinal manipulation, sham manipulation, and control groups. Patients in the spinal manipulation group received high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation treatment twice a week for 3 weeks. Patients in the sham group received an application that was very similar to the active treatment but was not expected to have any real therapeutic effect. Patients in the control group continued to receive pharmacological therapy. Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome, pain score (visual analog scale), and secondary outcomes, pressure pain threshold (PPT), Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), Widespread Pain Index (WPI), and Fibromyalgia Severity Score (FSS) were measured before, 1 month, and 3 months after randomization. ResultsSixty patients with a mean age of 41.7 years (SD = 8.0) were enrolled in the study. A mixed-design repeated analysis of covariance was used to test the data. At 1 month after randomization, pain scores did not differ between groups. At 3 months after randomization, the spinal manipulation group had a significantly lower pain score (adjusted mean = 4.3 cm, SE: 0.4) than the control group (adjusted mean = 6.8 cm, SE: 0.4) and the sham manipulation group (adjusted mean = 5.7 cm, SE: 0.4). PPT did not differ between groups at any time point. FIQR, WPI, and FSS showed some improvement 1 or 3 months after randomization in favor of the spinal manipulation group. ConclusionsSpinal manipulation used in addition to pharmacological treatment in young/middle-aged female patients with fibromyalgia could be an effective treatment for pain, disease severity, and functionality.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 351
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of 2 Osteopathic Treatment Approaches on Pain, Pressure-Pain Threshold, and Disease Severity in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Albers, Jessica
    Jaekel, Anne
    Wellmann, Kai
    von Hehn, Ulrike
    Schmidt, Tobias
    [J]. COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (02) : 122 - 128
  • [2] The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties
    Bennett, Robert M.
    Friend, Ronald
    Jones, Kim D.
    Ward, Rachel
    Han, Bobby K.
    Ross, Rebecca L.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2009, 11 (04)
  • [3] Castro-Sánchez AM, 2014, CLIN J PAIN, V30, P589, DOI 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000008
  • [4] The paradox of sham therapy and placebo effect in osteopathy: A systematic review
    Cerritelli, Francesco
    Verzella, Marco
    Cicchitti, Luca
    D'Alessandro, Giandomenico
    Vanacore, Nicola
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (35)
  • [5] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  • [6] Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
    Dal-Re, Rafael
    Janiaud, Perrine
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2018, 16
  • [7] Definitions DJ., 2008, MUSCULOSKELETAL MANU, V8, P12
  • [8] The placebo effect: is it unethical to use it or unethical not to?
    Elliott, David B.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2016, 36 (05) : 513 - 518
  • [9] Franklyn KL., 2011, INT J CLIN RHEUMTOL, V6, P463, DOI [10.2217/IJR.11.41, DOI 10.2217/IJR.11.41]
  • [10] Gamber Russell G., 2002, Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, V102, P321