Efficiency enhancements of a Monte Carlo beamlet based treatment planning process: implementation and parameter study

被引:6
|
作者
Mueller, S. [1 ]
Guyer, G.
Volken, W.
Frei, D.
Torelli, N.
Aebersold, D. M.
Manser, P.
Fix, M. K.
机构
[1] Bern Univ Hosp, Inselspital, Div Med Radiat Phys, Bern, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2023年 / 68卷 / 04期
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
beamlet; efficiency; Monte Carlo; treatment planning; inverse planning; COMBINED MODULATED ELECTRON; PROTON-PHOTON TREATMENTS; DOSE CALCULATION; OPTIMIZATION; THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; UNCERTAINTIES; GENERATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/acb480
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. The computational effort to perform beamlet calculation, plan optimization and final dose calculation of a treatment planning process (TPP) generating intensity modulated treatment plans is enormous, especially if Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are used for dose calculation. The goal of this work is to improve the computational efficiency of a fully MC based TPP for static and dynamic photon, electron and mixed photon-electron treatment techniques by implementing multiple methods and studying the influence of their parameters. Approach. A framework is implemented calculating MC beamlets efficiently in parallel on each available CPU core. The user can specify the desired statistical uncertainty of the beamlets, a fractional sparse dose threshold to save beamlets in a sparse format and minimal distances to the PTV surface from which 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 (medium) or even 4 x 4 x 4 = 64 (large) voxels are merged. The compromise between final plan quality and computational efficiency of beamlet calculation and optimization is studied for several parameter values to find a reasonable trade-off. For this purpose, four clinical and one academic case are considered with different treatment techniques. Main results. Setting the statistical uncertainty to 5% (photon beamlets) and 15% (electron beamlets), the fractional sparse dose threshold relative to the maximal beamlet dose to 0.1% and minimal distances for medium and large voxels to the PTV to 1 cm and 2 cm, respectively, does not lead to substantial degradation in final plan quality compared to using 2.5% (photon beamlets) and 5% (electron beamlets) statistical uncertainty and no sparse format nor voxel merging. Only OAR sparing is slightly degraded. Furthermore, computation times are reduced by about 58% (photon beamlets), 88% (electron beamlets) and 96% (optimization). Significance. Several methods are implemented improving computational efficiency of beamlet calculation and plan optimization of a fully MC based TPP without substantial degradation in final plan quality.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] GMC: a GPU implementation of a Monte Carlo dose calculation based on Geant4
    Jahnke, Lennart
    Fleckenstein, Jens
    Wenz, Frederik
    Hesser, Juergen
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (05): : 1217 - 1229
  • [32] Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for treatment planning
    Chamberland, Eve
    Beaulieu, Luc
    Lachance, Bernard
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (03): : 60 - 79
  • [33] Monte Carlo-based parametrization of the lateral dose spread for clinical treatment planning of scanned proton and carbon ion beams
    Parodi, Katia
    Mairani, Andrea
    Sommerer, Florian
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 : 91 - 96
  • [34] A virtual-acceterator-based verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam treatment planning in clinical situations
    Wieslander, Elinore
    Knoos, Tommy
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 (02) : 208 - 217
  • [35] Reporting and analyzing statistical uncertainties in Monte Carlo-based treatment planning
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    Rosu, Mihaela
    Kessler, Marc L.
    Fraass, Benedick A.
    Ten Haken, Randall K.
    Kong, Feng-Ming
    McShan, Daniel L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (04): : 1249 - 1259
  • [36] Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams
    Reynaert, N.
    van der Marck, S. C.
    Schaart, D. R.
    Van der Zee, W.
    Van Vliet-Vroegindeweij, C.
    Tomsej, M.
    Jansen, J.
    Heijmen, B.
    Coghe, M.
    De Wagter, C.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2007, 76 (04) : 643 - 686
  • [37] Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison
    Thomas Tessonnier
    Andrea Mairani
    Wenjing Chen
    Paola Sala
    Francesco Cerutti
    Alfredo Ferrari
    Thomas Haberer
    Jürgen Debus
    Katia Parodi
    Radiation Oncology, 13
  • [38] OpenMP-based Monte Carlo dose calculation for radiotherapy treatment planning on the Intel MIC Architecture
    Wang, Qinglin
    Liu, Jie
    Xie, Peizhen
    Gong, Chunye
    Li, Yuan
    Xing, Zuocheng
    2015 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN MEDICINE AND EDUCATION (ITME), 2015, : 138 - 142
  • [39] Clinical verification of treatment planning dose calculation in lung SBRT with GATE Monte Carlo simulation code
    Boiset, Gisell Ruiz
    Batista, Delano V. S.
    Cardoso, Simone Coutinho
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 87 : 1 - 10
  • [40] Efficiency enhancements to Monte Carlo simulation of heavy ion elastic recoil detection analysis spectra
    Franich, RD
    Johnston, PN
    Bubb, IF
    Dytlewski, N
    Cohen, DD
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2002, 190 : 252 - 255