Efficiency enhancements of a Monte Carlo beamlet based treatment planning process: implementation and parameter study

被引:6
|
作者
Mueller, S. [1 ]
Guyer, G.
Volken, W.
Frei, D.
Torelli, N.
Aebersold, D. M.
Manser, P.
Fix, M. K.
机构
[1] Bern Univ Hosp, Inselspital, Div Med Radiat Phys, Bern, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2023年 / 68卷 / 04期
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
beamlet; efficiency; Monte Carlo; treatment planning; inverse planning; COMBINED MODULATED ELECTRON; PROTON-PHOTON TREATMENTS; DOSE CALCULATION; OPTIMIZATION; THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; UNCERTAINTIES; GENERATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/acb480
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. The computational effort to perform beamlet calculation, plan optimization and final dose calculation of a treatment planning process (TPP) generating intensity modulated treatment plans is enormous, especially if Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are used for dose calculation. The goal of this work is to improve the computational efficiency of a fully MC based TPP for static and dynamic photon, electron and mixed photon-electron treatment techniques by implementing multiple methods and studying the influence of their parameters. Approach. A framework is implemented calculating MC beamlets efficiently in parallel on each available CPU core. The user can specify the desired statistical uncertainty of the beamlets, a fractional sparse dose threshold to save beamlets in a sparse format and minimal distances to the PTV surface from which 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 (medium) or even 4 x 4 x 4 = 64 (large) voxels are merged. The compromise between final plan quality and computational efficiency of beamlet calculation and optimization is studied for several parameter values to find a reasonable trade-off. For this purpose, four clinical and one academic case are considered with different treatment techniques. Main results. Setting the statistical uncertainty to 5% (photon beamlets) and 15% (electron beamlets), the fractional sparse dose threshold relative to the maximal beamlet dose to 0.1% and minimal distances for medium and large voxels to the PTV to 1 cm and 2 cm, respectively, does not lead to substantial degradation in final plan quality compared to using 2.5% (photon beamlets) and 5% (electron beamlets) statistical uncertainty and no sparse format nor voxel merging. Only OAR sparing is slightly degraded. Furthermore, computation times are reduced by about 58% (photon beamlets), 88% (electron beamlets) and 96% (optimization). Significance. Several methods are implemented improving computational efficiency of beamlet calculation and plan optimization of a fully MC based TPP without substantial degradation in final plan quality.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Beamlet-free optimization for Monte-Carlo-based treatment planning in proton therapy
    Pross, Danah
    Wuyckens, Sophie
    Deffet, Sylvain
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Lee, John A.
    Souris, Kevin
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (01) : 485 - 493
  • [2] Acceptance and Commissioning of a Treatment Planning System Based on Monte Carlo Calculations
    Lopez-Tarjuelo, J.
    Garcia-Molla, R.
    Juan-Senabre, X. J.
    Quiros-Higueras, J. D.
    Santos-Serra, A.
    de Marco-Blancas, N.
    Calzada-Feliu, S.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2014, 13 (02) : 129 - 138
  • [3] Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo based treatment plan QA platform for validation of Cyberknife and Tomotherapy treatments
    Reynaert, N.
    Demol, B.
    Charoy, M.
    Bouchoucha, S.
    Crop, F.
    Wagner, A.
    Lacornerie, T.
    Dubus, F.
    Rault, E.
    Comte, P.
    Cayez, R.
    Boydev, C.
    Pasquier, D.
    Mirabel, X.
    Lartigau, E.
    Sarrazin, T.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (10): : 1225 - 1237
  • [4] Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system
    Ma, CM
    Mok, E
    Kapur, A
    Pawlicki, T
    Findley, D
    Brain, S
    Forster, K
    Boyer, AL
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (10) : 2133 - 2143
  • [5] Dosimetric evaluation of the clinical implementation of the first commercial IMRT Monte Carlo treatment planning system at 6 MV
    Heath, E
    Seuntjens, J
    Sheikh-Bagheri, D
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) : 2771 - 2779
  • [6] RapidBrachyMCTPS: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system for brachytherapy applications
    Famulari, Gabriel
    Renaud, Marc-Andre
    Poole, Christopher M.
    Evans, Michael D. C.
    Seuntjens, Jan
    Enger, Shirin A.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (17):
  • [7] Radiotherapy treatment planning with Monte Carlo on a distributed system
    Chauvie, S
    Scielzo, G
    2003 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM, CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-5, 2004, : 1765 - 1769
  • [8] Efficient sampling algorithms for Monte Carlo based treatment planning
    DeMarco, JJ
    Solberg, TD
    Chetty, I
    Smathers, JB
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 1998, 53 (03) : 229 - 234
  • [9] Implementation of a dose calculation algorithm based on Monte Carlo simulations for treatment planning towards MRI guided ion beam therapy
    Padilla-Cabal, Fatima
    Resch, Andreas Franz
    Georg, Dietmar
    Fuchs, Hermann
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 74 : 155 - 165
  • [10] Photon energy-modulated radiotherapy: Monte Carlo simulation and treatment planning study
    Park, Jong Min
    Kim, Jung-in
    Choi, Chang Heon
    Chie, Eui Kyu
    Kim, Il Han
    Ye, Sung-Joon
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (03) : 1265 - 1277