Comparative study of post-impact motion control of a flexible arm space robot

被引:15
作者
Kayastha, Sharmila [1 ]
Katupitiya, Jayantha [2 ]
Pearce, Garth [2 ]
Rao, Asha [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Sci, Math Sci Discipline, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Mech & Mfg Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Post -impact dynamics of space robot; Motion control; Nonlinear model predictive control; Sliding mode control; Linear quadratic regulator; COORDINATED CONTROL; ADAPTIVE-CONTROL; IMPACT DYNAMICS; MANIPULATORS; POSITION; ATTITUDE; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcon.2022.100738
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Designing a controller to manipulate a flexible space robot is hampered by the inherent complex nonlin-ear dynamics. Furthermore, the collision of a space robot with an external object in the space environ-ment often leads to degradation of the space robot system. Therefore, an effective control algorithm is necessary for a successful space robot mission to regulate the motion of the entire system after an im-pact. This paper presents a comparative study on the performance of two different composite controllers to control post-impact motion of the space robot with two-link flexible arms. A performance compari-son study helps to choose a better controller to carry out specific tasks. The dynamics of a space robot with flexible manipulators are highly nonlinear and coupled, hence split into rigid and flexible motion to make the control design easier. In this paper, two different com posite controllers, namely Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with a Linear Quadratic Regulator (NMPC-LQR) and Sliding Mode Control with Linear Quadratic Regulator (SMC-LQR) are developed. NMPC and SMC are used to control rigid motion of the system, while LQR is used to suppress the flexible motion. The objective of the proposed controllers is to regulate the motion of the entire space robot system, including the flexible manipulator, after impact with an external object. The effectiveness of the proposed composite controllers is demonstrated using numerical simulations. Simulation results confirm that, in the absence of uncertainties, the performance of the control system using the proposed NMPC-LQR is more accurate compared to using SMC-LQR. Fur-thermore, given uncertainties of mass and inertia of the system, we find NMPC-LQR provides a higher level of accuracy when compared to SMC-LQR.(c) 2022 European Control Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[41]   Nonlinear model predictive control of a robot manipulator [J].
Poignet, P ;
Gautier, M .
6TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ADVANCED MOTION CONTROL, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, :401-406
[42]   Impact modeling and reactionless control for post-capturing and maneuvering of orbiting objects using a multi-arm space robot [J].
Raina, Deepak ;
Gora, Sunil ;
Maheshwari, Dheeraj ;
Shah, Suril, V .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2021, 182 :21-36
[43]   Control System for Free-Floating Space Manipulator Based on Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) [J].
Rybus, Tomasz ;
Seweryn, Karol ;
Sasiadek, Jurek Z. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2017, 85 (3-4) :491-509
[44]   Methodology for control of a space robot with flexible links [J].
Senda, K ;
Murotsu, Y .
IEE PROCEEDINGS-CONTROL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 147 (06) :562-568
[45]   Robust coordinated control of a dual-arm space robot [J].
Shi, Lingling ;
Kayastha, Sharmila ;
Katupitiya, Jay .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2017, 138 :475-489
[46]  
Shi LL, 2016, P AMER CONTR CONF, P4966, DOI 10.1109/ACC.2016.7526140
[47]  
Slotine J.-J. E., 1991, Applied nonlinear control
[48]  
Stansbery DT, 2000, P AMER CONTR CONF, P1867, DOI 10.1109/ACC.2000.879525
[49]  
Talebi HA, 2001, LECT NOTES CONTR INF, V261, P1
[50]   COMPARISON OF THE ASSUMED MODES AND FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS FOR FLEXIBLE MULTILINK MANIPULATORS [J].
THEODORE, RJ ;
GHOSAL, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 1995, 14 (02) :91-111