Fuzzy TOPSIS-based risk assessment model for effective nuclear decommissioning risk management

被引:24
作者
Awodi, Ngbede Junior [1 ,4 ]
Liu, Yong-kuo [1 ]
Ayo-Imoru, Ronke M. [2 ,4 ]
Ayodeji, Abiodun [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Engn Univ, Fundamental Sci Nucl Safety & Simulat Technol Lab, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Elect Engn Technol, Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Bangor Univ, Nucl Futures Inst, Bangor LL57, Gwynedd, Wales
[4] Nigeria Atom Energy Commiss, Nucl Power Plant Dev Directorate, Abuja, Nigeria
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fuzzy modeling; Nuclear decommissioning; Risk assessment; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Risk management; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104524
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The dynamics of the nuclear decommissioning project warrant a critical study of the inherent risks and un-certainties. Previous works have identified several nuclear decommissioning risk factors. However, there is no detailed study that systematically ranks the risk factors to aid risk management decision-making. This work presents a fuzzy-based Technique for Order Preference by Similarities to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS) to evaluate the overall risk factors that may arise in a nuclear decommissioning project. The novel analytic tool presented in this work is used to rank eighteen nuclear decommissioning project risk factors according to their severity, for easy risk management. The evaluation and ranking metrics are the Fuzzy Positive Ideal Solution (FPIS), Fuzzy Negative Ideal Solution (FNIP), and Closeness Coefficient (CC). Feedback from nuclear decom-missioning experts is processed in linguistic terms and converted into fuzzy values to perform the computation of the closeness coefficient rank for each of the risk factors. The ranking shows the effect of each risk factor on project safety, cost overrun, and time delay. The highest ranked risk factors are the structural condition of the facility before decommissioning, the radiological characteristics of the facility before decommissioning, and the established regulation for the disposal of radioactive material, with closeness coefficients of 0.54351, 0.53239, and 0.48637 respectively. The lowest ranked risk factors are the historical documentation, the availability and condition of waste management facility, and increasing public opposition, with closeness coefficients 0.33806, 0.33355, and 0.28917 respectively. The result shows the capability and the importance of the proposed approach for nuclear decommissioning risk assessment, risk management, and optimal decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Awodi NJ, 2021, PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING (ICONE28), VOL 3
  • [2] Expert judgement-based risk factor identification and analysis for an effective nuclear decommissioning risk assessment modeling
    Awodi, Ngbede Junior
    Liu, Yong-Kuo
    Ayodeji, Abiodun
    Adibeli, Justina Onyinyechukwu
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 136
  • [3] Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
    Chen, CT
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [4] Collins T., 2001, DIVISION SYSTEMS SAF
  • [5] Nuclear decommissioning costs: The impact of recoverability risk on valuation
    D'Souza, J
    Jacob, J
    Soderstrom, NS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2000, 29 (02) : 207 - 230
  • [6] Economics O, 2013, EC BEN IMPR UKS NUCL
  • [7] Safety climate differences among job positions in a nuclear decommissioning and demolition industry: Employees' self-reported safety attitudes and perceptions
    Findley, Michael
    Smith, Susan
    Gorski, June
    O'neil, Michael
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2007, 45 (08) : 875 - 889
  • [8] Selection of vegetable oil based biolubricant using TOPSIS MCDM model
    Hussain, Md Modassir
    Gaval, V. R.
    Pratap, A. P.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 62 : 512 - 516
  • [9] IAEA, 2019, MAN PROJ RISKS DEC
  • [10] Managing social challenges in the nuclear decommissioning industry: A responsible approach towards better performance
    Invemizzi, Diletta Colette
    Locatelli, Giorgio
    Brookes, Naomi J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (07) : 1350 - 1364