Three-dimensional quantification of skeletal midfacial complex symmetry

被引:3
作者
Morgan, Nermin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shujaat, Sohaib [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Jazil, Omid [1 ,2 ]
Jacobs, Reinhilde [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Dept Imaging & Pathol, OMFS IMPATH Res Grp, Kapucijnenvoer 33 Bus 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kapucijnenvoer 33 Bus 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Med, Mansoura, Egypt
[4] King Saud Bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Dent, Dept Maxillofacial Surg & Diagnost Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Midfacial complex; Symmetry; Automatic segmentation; CBCT; Mirroring reconstructive surgeries; Virtual surgical planning; FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY; AIDED RECONSTRUCTION; ORBITAL FLOOR; SEGMENTATION; VALIDATION; FRACTURES; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s11548-022-02775-0
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Purpose Quantification of skeletal symmetry in a healthy population could have a strong impact on the reconstructive surgical procedures where mirroring of the contralateral healthy side acts as a clinical reference for the restoration of unilateral defects. Hence, the aim of this study was to three-dimensionally assess the symmetry of skeletal midfacial complex in skeletal class I patients. Methods A sample of 100 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans (50 males, 50 females; age range: 19-40 years) were recruited. Automated segmentation of the skeletal midfacial complex was performed to create a three-dimensional (3D) virtual model using a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based segmentation tool. Thereafter, the segmented model was mirrored and registered to quantify skeletal symmetry using a color-coded conformance mapping based on a surface part comparison analysis. Results Overall, the mean and root-mean-square (RMS) differences between complete true and mirrored models were 0.14 +/- 0.12 and 0.87 +/- 0.21 mm, respectively. Female patients had a significantly more symmetrical midfacial complex (mean difference: 0.11 +/- 0.1 mm, RMS: 0.81 +/- 0.17 mm) compared to male patients (mean difference: 0.16 +/- 0.13 mm, RMS: 0.94 +/- 0.23 mm). No significant difference existed between left and right sides irrespective of the patient's gender. Conclusion The comparison between true and mirrored complete and left/right split midfacial complex showed symmetry within a clinically acceptable range of 1 mm, which justifies the applicability of using the mirroring technique. The presented data could act as a reference guide for surgeons during planning of reconstructive surgical procedures and outcome assessment at follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 619
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[41]  
Yamamoto Kazuhiko, 2014, Mater Sociomed, V26, P21, DOI 10.5455/msm.2014.26.21-25
[42]   Prevalence and etiology of midfacial fractures: A study of 799 cases [J].
Zaleckas, Linas ;
Peciuliene, Vytaute ;
Gendviliene, Ieva ;
Puriene, Alina ;
Rimkuviene, Jurate .
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2015, 51 (04) :222-227
[43]   Computer-assisted reconstruction of orbital floor based on cone beam tomography [J].
Zizelmann, Christoph ;
Gellrich, Nils Claudius ;
Metzger, Marc Christian ;
Schoen, Ralf ;
Schmelzeisen, Rainer ;
Schramm, Alexander .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 45 (01) :79-80