Three-dimensional quantification of skeletal midfacial complex symmetry

被引:3
作者
Morgan, Nermin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shujaat, Sohaib [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Jazil, Omid [1 ,2 ]
Jacobs, Reinhilde [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Dept Imaging & Pathol, OMFS IMPATH Res Grp, Kapucijnenvoer 33 Bus 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kapucijnenvoer 33 Bus 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Med, Mansoura, Egypt
[4] King Saud Bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Dent, Dept Maxillofacial Surg & Diagnost Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Midfacial complex; Symmetry; Automatic segmentation; CBCT; Mirroring reconstructive surgeries; Virtual surgical planning; FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY; AIDED RECONSTRUCTION; ORBITAL FLOOR; SEGMENTATION; VALIDATION; FRACTURES; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s11548-022-02775-0
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Purpose Quantification of skeletal symmetry in a healthy population could have a strong impact on the reconstructive surgical procedures where mirroring of the contralateral healthy side acts as a clinical reference for the restoration of unilateral defects. Hence, the aim of this study was to three-dimensionally assess the symmetry of skeletal midfacial complex in skeletal class I patients. Methods A sample of 100 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans (50 males, 50 females; age range: 19-40 years) were recruited. Automated segmentation of the skeletal midfacial complex was performed to create a three-dimensional (3D) virtual model using a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based segmentation tool. Thereafter, the segmented model was mirrored and registered to quantify skeletal symmetry using a color-coded conformance mapping based on a surface part comparison analysis. Results Overall, the mean and root-mean-square (RMS) differences between complete true and mirrored models were 0.14 +/- 0.12 and 0.87 +/- 0.21 mm, respectively. Female patients had a significantly more symmetrical midfacial complex (mean difference: 0.11 +/- 0.1 mm, RMS: 0.81 +/- 0.17 mm) compared to male patients (mean difference: 0.16 +/- 0.13 mm, RMS: 0.94 +/- 0.23 mm). No significant difference existed between left and right sides irrespective of the patient's gender. Conclusion The comparison between true and mirrored complete and left/right split midfacial complex showed symmetry within a clinically acceptable range of 1 mm, which justifies the applicability of using the mirroring technique. The presented data could act as a reference guide for surgeons during planning of reconstructive surgical procedures and outcome assessment at follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 619
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Comparison of different midsagittal plane configurations for evaluating craniofacial asymmetry by expert preference [J].
An, Sangln ;
Lee, Ji-Yeon ;
Chung, Chooryung J. ;
Kim, Kyung-Ho .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (06) :788-797
[2]   Repeatability Study of Angular and Linear Measurements on Facial Morphology Analysis by Means of Stereophotogrammetry [J].
Andrade, Lilian Mendes ;
Bettoni Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Maria ;
Magri, Lais Valencise ;
Moreira Rodrigues da Silva, Marco Antonio .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (04) :1107-1111
[3]   Comparing 3-Dimensional Virtual Methods for Reconstruction in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery [J].
Benazzi, Stefano ;
Senck, Sascha .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (04) :1184-1194
[4]   Validation of the Vectra H1 portable three-dimensional photogrammetry system for facial imaging [J].
Camison, L. ;
Bykowski, M. ;
Lee, W. W. ;
Carlson, J. C. ;
Roosenboom, J. ;
Goldstein, J. A. ;
Losee, J. E. ;
Weinberg, S. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (03) :403-410
[5]  
Carrao V., 2018, Digital Technologies in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, P117, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4939-1532-36, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1532-36]
[6]   Analysis of simulated mandibular reconstruction using a segmental mirroring technique [J].
Davies, Joel C. ;
Chan, Harley H. L. ;
Jozaghi, Yelda ;
Goldstein, David P. ;
Irish, Jonathan C. .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 47 (03) :468-472
[7]   Predictability in orbital reconstruction: A human cadaver study. Part II: Navigation-assisted orbital reconstruction [J].
Dubois, Leander ;
Schreurs, Ruud ;
Jansen, Jesper ;
Maal, Thomas J. J. ;
Essig, Harald ;
Goons, Peter J. J. ;
Becking, Alfred G. .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (10) :2042-2049
[8]   Hard- and soft-tissue symmetry comparison in patients with Class III malocclusion [J].
Duran, Gokhan Serhat ;
Dindaroglu, Furkan ;
Kutlu, Pinar .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 155 (04) :509-522
[9]   A Multivariate Approach to Determine the Dimensionality of Human Facial Asymmetry [J].
Ekrami, Omid ;
Claes, Peter ;
White, Julie D. ;
Weinberg, Seth M. ;
Marazita, Mary L. ;
Walsh, Susan ;
Shriver, Mark D. ;
Van Dongen, Stefan .
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (03)
[10]   An assessment of the magnitude, parallelism, and asymmetry of micro-implant-assisted rapid maxillary expansion in non-growing patients [J].
Elkenawy, Islam ;
Fijany, Layla ;
Colak, Ozge ;
Paredes, Ney Alberto ;
Gargoum, Ausama ;
Abedini, Sara ;
Cantarella, Daniele ;
Dominguez-Mompell, Ramon ;
Sfogliano, Luca ;
Moon, Won .
PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 21 (01)