共 23 条
Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes: A comparison of ecosystem services deliveryPalabras clave(sic)(sic)(sic)
被引:5
|作者:
Bazzan, Giulia
[1
]
Candel, Jeroen
[2
]
Daugbjerg, Carsten
[1
]
Pecurul, Mireia
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Publ Adm & Policy Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Forest Sci & Technol Ctr Catalonia, Solsona, Spain
基金:
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词:
comparative methods;
configurational explanation;
ecosystem delivery measures;
implementation success;
institutional analysis;
AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL SCHEMES;
COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE;
EXPLANATORY TYPOLOGIES;
NATURE CONSERVATION;
PAYMENTS;
DESIGN;
FARMERS;
PES;
PARTICIPATION;
PERFORMANCE;
D O I:
10.1111/psj.12476
中图分类号:
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号:
0302 ;
030201 ;
摘要:
This paper employs the Institutional Analysis and Development framework across six ecosystem delivery measures in the European Union to develop a configurational explanation of (un)successful outcomes. By undertaking comparative institutional analysis, we systematically examine the effect of variation across rule types and generate insights on how different institutional configurations result in varying degrees of successful implementation of ecosystem delivery measures. We apply explanatory typology methods to identify the institutional features that best explain variation in implementation success across a number of cases. We argue that institutional rules shape outcomes in conjunction rather than in isolation. The findings show that differences in implementation success across cases can be explained by the interplay of differences in knowledge exchange, flexibility in implementation, and participation in the policy design process.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 527
页数:27
相关论文