What We Know and Need to Know about Literacy Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties and Disabilities, including Dyslexia

被引:25
作者
Al Otaiba, Stephanie [1 ]
McMaster, Kristen [2 ,3 ]
Wanzek, Jeanne [4 ]
Zaru, Mai W. [5 ]
机构
[1] Southern Methodist Univ, Simmons Sch Educ & Human Dev, Teaching & Learning, Dallas, TX 75205 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Reading Success, Coll Educ & Human Dev, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Educ Psychol, Coll Educ & Human Dev, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Special Educ, Peabody Coll, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[5] Southern Methodist Univ, Simmons Sch Educ & Human Dev, Dallas, TX USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
dyslexia; literacy intervention; reading difficulty; reading disability; struggling readers; STRUGGLING READERS; SIMPLE VIEW; INSTRUCTION; METAANALYSIS; RISK; PREDICTORS; CHILDREN; LANGUAGE; IMPACT; SPELL;
D O I
10.1002/rrq.458
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to describe what we know and what we still need to learn about literacy intervention for children who experience significant difficulties learning to read. We reviewed 14 meta-analyses and systematic reviews of experimental and quasi-experimental studies published in the last decade that examined the effects of reading and writing interventions in the elementary grades, including research focused on students with reading difficulties and disabilities, including dyslexia. We attended to moderator analyses, when available, to further refine what we know and need to learn about interventions. Findings from these reviews indicate that explicit and systematic interventions focusing on the code and meaning dimensions of reading and writing, and delivered one-to-one or in small groups, are likely to improve foundational code-based reading skills, and to a lesser extent, meaning-based skills, across elementary grade levels. Findings, at least in the upper elementary grades, indicate that some intervention features including standardized protocols, multiple components, and longer duration can yield stronger effects. And, integrating reading and writing interventions shows promise. We still need to learn more about specific instructional routines and components that provide more robust effects on students' ability to comprehend and individual differences in response to interventions. We discuss limitations of this review of reviews and suggest directions for future research to optimize implementation, particularly to understand for whom and under what conditions literacy interventions work best.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 332
页数:20
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Adams M.J., 1990, BEGINNING READ THINK
[2]   Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention - A review of the literature [J].
Al Otaiba, S ;
Fuchs, D .
REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2002, 23 (05) :300-316
[3]   Elementary Grade Intervention Approaches to Treat Specific Learning Disabilities, Including Dyslexia [J].
Al Otaiba, Stephanie ;
Rouse, Amy Gillespie ;
Baker, Kristi .
LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2018, 49 (04) :829-842
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction
[5]   Intensive Reading Interventions for Inadequate Responders in Grades K-3: A Synthesis [J].
Austin, Christy R. ;
Vaughn, Sharon ;
McClelland, Amanda M. .
LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 2017, 40 (04) :191-210
[6]   Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye [J].
Berninger, VW ;
Abbott, RD ;
Abbott, SP ;
Graham, S ;
Richards, T .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2002, 35 (01) :39-56
[7]  
Birsch J.R., 2011, Multisensory teaching of basic language skills, VThird
[8]   Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert [J].
Castles, Anne ;
Rastle, Kathleen ;
Nation, Kate .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2018, 19 (01) :5-51
[9]   Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading [J].
Catts, HW ;
Adlof, SM ;
Weismer, SE .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2006, 49 (02) :278-293
[10]   How the Reading for Understanding Initiative's Research Complicates the Simple View of Reading Invoked in the Science of Reading [J].
Cervetti, Gina N. ;
Pearson, P. David ;
Palincsar, Annemarie S. ;
Afflerbach, Peter ;
Kendeou, Panayiota ;
Biancarosa, Gina ;
Higgs, Jennifer ;
Fitzgerald, Miranda S. ;
Berman, Amy, I .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2020, 55 :S161-S172