Towards circular economy indicators: Evidence from the European Union

被引:21
|
作者
D'Adamo, Idiano [1 ]
Favari, Daniele [2 ]
Gastaldi, Massimo [3 ,7 ]
Kirchherr, Julian [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Comp Control & Management Engn, Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Laquila, Dept Ind & Informat Engn & Econ, Laquila, Italy
[4] Roskilde Univ, Dept Social Sci & Business, Roskilde, Denmark
[5] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Innovat Studies Grp, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Environm Energy & Nat Resource Gover, Cambridge, England
[7] Univ Laquila, Dept Ind & Informat Engn & Econ, Via Gronchi 18, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
关键词
Circular economy; Europe; indicators; multi-criteria decision analysis; resource management; WASTE TREATMENT; END; SUSTAINABILITY; EFFICIENCY; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X241237171
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Union (EU) is moving towards sustainable development, and a key role is played by circular economy (CE) models geared towards reducing pressure on natural resources, generating jobs and fostering economic opportunities. Indicators are able to aggregate a variety of information and their use, through the use of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), allows the performance of alternatives to be monitored. This work aims to calculate the performance of the EU27 in the years 2019 and 2020 according to 15 CE indicators available on Eurostat. The results of the Analytic Hierarchy process show that the greatest impact on circularity is determined by the category 'competitiveness and innovation', which together with the category 'global sustainability and resilience' accounts for two thirds of the overall weight. The MCDA results show that Belgium prevails in both the baseline and alternative scenarios, ahead of Italy and the Netherlands respectively. In general, circular policies see western European countries excel, while the performance of eastern European countries is weaker. The implications of this work highlight the three main barriers to the development of CE models: (i) illegal waste management; (ii) lack of knowledge and low level of investment in circular technologies and (iii) low distribution of value among stakeholders. In this way, resource management based on circularity will enable Europe to meet the challenges of sustainability with less dependence on imported raw materials.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 680
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Do circular innovations and carrying capacity of natural environment enhance circular economy in the European Union? Evidence from simulation and machine learning methods
    Xu, Shanming
    Wang, Ying
    Journal of Environmental Management, 2025,
  • [32] The European Economy: From a Linear to a Circular Economy
    Bonciu, Florin
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN AFFAIRS, 2014, 14 (04) : 78 - 91
  • [33] Motivations of European Union Members States to Adopt Circular Economy Strategies: Towards a Critical Geopolitical Approach
    Alberich, Josep Pinyol
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, 2022, (39): : 45 - 72
  • [34] Regional development of Circular Economy in the European Union: A multidimensional analysis
    Silvestri, Francesco
    Spigarelli, Francesca
    Tassinari, Mattia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 255
  • [35] The state of the research on circular economy in the European Union: A bibliometric review
    Dragomir, Voicu D.
    Dumitru, Madalina
    CLEANER WASTE SYSTEMS, 2024, 7
  • [36] A comparative analysis of the circular economy performances for European Union countries
    Candan, Gokce
    Toklu, Merve Cengiz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (07): : 653 - 664
  • [37] A systematic literature review on the circular economy initiatives in the European Union
    Mhatre, Purva
    Panchal, Rohit
    Singh, Anju
    Bibyan, Shyam
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 26 : 187 - 202
  • [38] THE TRANSITION TOWARDS TO THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY: EUROPEAN SMES' TRAJECTORIES
    Marino, Alfonso
    Pariso, Paolo
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2021, 8 (04): : 431 - 445
  • [39] Macroeconomic Indicators and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from the European Union
    Marton, Boris
    Mojsejova, Alena
    STATISTIKA-STATISTICS AND ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2022, 102 (04) : 369 - 381
  • [40] Country ESG Ratings Based on Composite Indicators: Evidence from the European Union
    Jilkova, Petra
    Kotesovcova, Jana
    INTERNATIONAL ADVANCES IN ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (01) : 107 - 109