The politics of just transition: Authoritarian environmentalism and implementation flexibility in forest conservation

被引:4
作者
Lo, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Geog, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Just transition; Authoritarian environmentalism; Policy implementation; Implementation flexibility; China; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; ECOLOGICAL CIVILIZATION; CO-BENEFITS; CHINA; GOVERNANCE; GAP; CHALLENGES; AMBIGUITY; CITY; OPPORTUNITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103066
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper develops a political perspective of just transition by linking the just transition concept with the concept of policy implementation, thereby drawing attention to the role of local policy implementers in the process and outcome of just transition. Focusing on the Chinese political context, it examines the degree of implementation flexibility in a broader context of authoritarian environmentalism. Implementation flexibility at the local level has been an enduring feature of Chinese environmental governance and can be considered as a key political process through which just transition can be achieved. However, recent studies suggest that the strengthening of top -down control over the environment means that the implementation process has become less flexible. Drawing on a case study of a logging town in the Greater Khingan Range transitioning under the National Forest Conservation Program, we found that while the strengthening of top -down control has resulted in an elevated level of compliance, flexibility remains an important dynamic in policy implementation. As such, local policy implementers still play an important role in just transition. This persistence of implementation flexibility is driven by a combination of local priorities, implementation difficulties, and top -down control.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 116 条
[31]   Co-benefits approach: Opportunities for implementing sponge city and urban heat island mitigation [J].
He, Bao-Jie ;
Zhu, Jin ;
Zhao, Dong-Xue ;
Gou, Zhong-Hua ;
Qi, Jin-Da ;
Wang, Junsong .
LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 86 :147-157
[32]   The 'just transition' threat to our Energy and Climate 2030 targets [J].
Heffron, Raphael J. ;
McCauley, Darren .
ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 165
[33]   Advocating a just transition in Appalachia: Civil society and industrial change in a carbon-intensive region [J].
Hess, David J. ;
McKane, Rachel G. ;
Belletto, Kaelee .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 75
[34]   Does environment centralization prevent local governments from racing to the bottom? -Evidence from China [J].
Hong, Tao ;
Yu, Nannan ;
Mao, Zhonggen .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 :649-659
[36]   When energy justice encounters authoritarian environmentalism: The case of clean heating energy transitions in rural China [J].
Hu, Zhanping .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 70
[37]   User Outcomes and Children's Services Reform: Ambiguity and Conflict in the Policy Implementation Process [J].
Hudson, Bob .
SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2006, 5 (02) :227-236
[38]   Politicising the Just Transition: Linking global climate policy, Nationally Determined Contributions and targeted research agendas [J].
Jenkins, Kirsten E. H. ;
Sovacool, Benjamin K. ;
Blachowicz, Andrzej ;
Lauer, Adrian .
GEOFORUM, 2020, 115 :138-142
[39]   Could campaign-style enforcement improve environmental performance? Evidence from China's central environmental protection inspection [J].
Jia, Kai ;
Chen, Shaowei .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 245 :282-290
[40]   Modelling the influence of harvesting on Chinese boreal forest carbon dynamics [J].
Jiang, H ;
Apps, MJ ;
Peng, CH ;
Zhang, YL ;
Liu, JX .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 169 (1-2) :65-82