The politics of just transition: Authoritarian environmentalism and implementation flexibility in forest conservation

被引:3
作者
Lo, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Geog, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Just transition; Authoritarian environmentalism; Policy implementation; Implementation flexibility; China; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; ECOLOGICAL CIVILIZATION; CO-BENEFITS; CHINA; GOVERNANCE; GAP; CHALLENGES; AMBIGUITY; CITY; OPPORTUNITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103066
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper develops a political perspective of just transition by linking the just transition concept with the concept of policy implementation, thereby drawing attention to the role of local policy implementers in the process and outcome of just transition. Focusing on the Chinese political context, it examines the degree of implementation flexibility in a broader context of authoritarian environmentalism. Implementation flexibility at the local level has been an enduring feature of Chinese environmental governance and can be considered as a key political process through which just transition can be achieved. However, recent studies suggest that the strengthening of top -down control over the environment means that the implementation process has become less flexible. Drawing on a case study of a logging town in the Greater Khingan Range transitioning under the National Forest Conservation Program, we found that while the strengthening of top -down control has resulted in an elevated level of compliance, flexibility remains an important dynamic in policy implementation. As such, local policy implementers still play an important role in just transition. This persistence of implementation flexibility is driven by a combination of local priorities, implementation difficulties, and top -down control.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 118 条
  • [1] Synergy and co-benefits of reducing CO2 and air pollutant emissions by promoting electric vehicles-A case of Shanghai
    Alimujiang, Adila
    Jiang, Ping
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 55 : 181 - 189
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, CHINA CONFRONTS CLIM
  • [3] Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis
    Azungah, Theophilus
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (04) : 383 - 400
  • [4] The energy-extractives nexus and the just transition
    Bainton, Nicholas
    Kemp, Deanna
    Lebre, Eleonore
    Owen, John R.
    Marston, Greg
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 29 (04) : 624 - 634
  • [5] Divergent desires for the just transition in South Africa: An assemblage analysis
    Barnes, Jonathan
    [J]. POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 97
  • [6] Bracken I, 1982, Planning Outlook, V25, P10
  • [7] To Bridge the Divide between Evidence and Policy: Reduce Ambiguity as Much as Uncertainty
    Cairney, Paul
    Oliver, Kathryn
    Wellstead, Adam
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2016, 76 (03) : 399 - 402
  • [8] The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition
    Carley, Sanya
    Konisky, David M.
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2020, 5 (08) : 569 - 577
  • [9] A Green New Deal for all: The centrality of a worker and community-led just transition in the US
    Cha, J. Mijin
    Stevis, Dimitris
    Vachon, Todd E.
    Price, Vivian
    Brescia-Weiler, Maria
    [J]. POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 95
  • [10] A just transition for whom? Politics, contestation, and social identity in the disruption of coal in the Powder River Basin
    Cha, J. Mijin
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 69