Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation: An in vitro study

被引:9
作者
Tao, Baoxin [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Xingqi [3 ]
Wang, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xiaojun [3 ,5 ]
Shen, Yihan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wu, Yiqun [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Dent Ctr 2, Sch Med,Coll Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Res Inst Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Biomed Mfg & Life Qual Engn, Sch Mech Engn, State Key Lab Mech Syst & Vibrat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Coll Stomatol,Dept Dent Ctr 2, 280 Mohe Rd, Shanghai 201999, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Surgery; Computer-assisted; Augmented reality; Dental implants; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Augmented reality has been gradually applied in dental implant surgery. However, whether the dynamic navigation system integrated with augmented reality technology will further improve the accuracy is still unknown. The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic navigation and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation systems. Materials and methods: Thirty-two cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans from clinical patients were collected and used to generate 64 phantoms that were allocated to the augmented reality based dynamic navigation (ARDN) group or the conventional dynamic navigation (DN) group. The primary outcomes were global coronal, apical and angular deviations, and they were measured after image fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was used. A P value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: A total of 242 dental implants were placed in two groups. The global coronal, apical and angular deviations of the ARDN and DN groups were 1.31 +/- 0.67 mm vs. 1.18 +/- 0.59 mm, 1.36 +/- 0.67 mm vs. 1.39 +/- 0.55 mm, and 3.72 +/- 2.13(degrees) vs. 3.1 +/- 1.56(degrees), respectively. No significant differences were found with regard to coronal and apical deviations (P = 0.16 and 0.6, respectively), but the DN group had a significantly lower angular deviation than the ARDN group (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The augmented reality-based dynamic navigation system yielded a similar accuracy to the conventional dynamic navigation system for dental implant placement in coronal and apical points, but the augmented reality-based dynamic navigation system yielded a higher angular deviation. 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 202
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology: The Influence of Surgical Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy and Operating Time. An in Vitro Study [J].
Pellegrino, Gerardo ;
Bellini, Pierantonio ;
Cavallini, Pier Francesco ;
Ferri, Agnese ;
Zacchino, Andrea ;
Taraschi, Valerio ;
Marchetti, Claudio ;
Consolo, Ugo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (06)
[22]   Accuracy of 3 calibration methods of computer-assisted dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study [J].
Pei, Xiyan ;
Liu, Xiaoqiang ;
Iao, Siniong ;
Ma, Feifei ;
Li, Hong ;
Sun, Feng .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 131 (04) :668-674
[23]   Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement [J].
Dong Wu ;
Lin Zhou ;
Jin Yang ;
Bao Zhang ;
Yanjun Lin ;
Jiang Chen ;
Wenxiu Huang ;
Yonghui Chen .
International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 6
[24]   Augmented reality surgical navigation with accurate CBCT-patient registration for dental implant placement [J].
Ma, Longfei ;
Jiang, Weipeng ;
Zhang, Boyu ;
Qu, Xiaofeng ;
Ning, Guochen ;
Zhang, Xinran ;
Liao, Hongen .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2019, 57 (01) :47-57
[25]   Accuracy of a Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation System in the Placement of Zygomatic Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study [J].
Gonzalez Rueda, Juan Ramon ;
Garcia Avila, Irene ;
de Paz Hermoso, Victor Manuel ;
Riad Deglow, Elena ;
Zubizarreta-Macho, Alvaro ;
Pato Mourelo, Jesus ;
Montero Martin, Javier ;
Hernandez Montero, Sofia .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (05)
[26]   Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
Aydemir, Ceyda Aktolun ;
Arisan, Volkan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (03) :255-263
[27]   Accuracy of intentionally tilted implant placement in the maxilla using dynamic navigation: a retrospective clinical analysis [J].
Meng, T. ;
Zhang, X. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (04) :552-557
[28]   Augmented reality-based surgical navigation of pelvic screw placement: an ex-vivo experimental feasibility study [J].
Heining, Sandro-Michael ;
Raykov, Vladislav ;
Wolff, Oliver ;
Alkadhi, Hatem ;
Pape, Hans-Christoph ;
Wanner, Guido A. .
PATIENT SAFETY IN SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
[29]   Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice [J].
Stefanelli, Luigi, V ;
DeGroot, Bradley S. ;
Lipton, David, I ;
Mandelaris, George A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (01) :205-213
[30]   Accuracy of a Novel Robot-Assisted System and Dynamic Navigation System for Dental Implant Placement: A Clinical Retrospective Study [J].
Chen, Jianping ;
Ding, Yude ;
Cao, Ruijue ;
Zheng, Yuchen ;
Shen, Liheng ;
Wang, Linhong ;
Yang, Fan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025,