Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation: An in vitro study

被引:10
作者
Tao, Baoxin [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Xingqi [3 ]
Wang, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xiaojun [3 ,5 ]
Shen, Yihan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wu, Yiqun [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Dent Ctr 2, Sch Med,Coll Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Res Inst Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Biomed Mfg & Life Qual Engn, Sch Mech Engn, State Key Lab Mech Syst & Vibrat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Coll Stomatol,Dept Dent Ctr 2, 280 Mohe Rd, Shanghai 201999, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Surgery; Computer-assisted; Augmented reality; Dental implants; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Augmented reality has been gradually applied in dental implant surgery. However, whether the dynamic navigation system integrated with augmented reality technology will further improve the accuracy is still unknown. The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic navigation and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation systems. Materials and methods: Thirty-two cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans from clinical patients were collected and used to generate 64 phantoms that were allocated to the augmented reality based dynamic navigation (ARDN) group or the conventional dynamic navigation (DN) group. The primary outcomes were global coronal, apical and angular deviations, and they were measured after image fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was used. A P value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: A total of 242 dental implants were placed in two groups. The global coronal, apical and angular deviations of the ARDN and DN groups were 1.31 +/- 0.67 mm vs. 1.18 +/- 0.59 mm, 1.36 +/- 0.67 mm vs. 1.39 +/- 0.55 mm, and 3.72 +/- 2.13(degrees) vs. 3.1 +/- 1.56(degrees), respectively. No significant differences were found with regard to coronal and apical deviations (P = 0.16 and 0.6, respectively), but the DN group had a significantly lower angular deviation than the ARDN group (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The augmented reality-based dynamic navigation system yielded a similar accuracy to the conventional dynamic navigation system for dental implant placement in coronal and apical points, but the augmented reality-based dynamic navigation system yielded a higher angular deviation. 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 202
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Reducing errors in guided implant surgery to optimize treatment outcomes [J].
Chackartchi, Tali ;
Romanos, Georgios E. ;
Parkanyi, Laszlo ;
Schwarz, Frank ;
Sculean, Anton .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2022, 88 (01) :64-72
[2]   Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery [J].
D'haese, Jan ;
Ackhurst, Johan ;
Wismeijer, Daniel ;
De Bruyn, Hugo ;
Tahmaseb, Ali .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) :121-133
[3]   An In Vitro Model to Evaluate the Accuracy of Guided Implant Placement Based on the Surgeon's Experience [J].
Fernandez-Gil, Angeles ;
Serrano Gil, Herminia ;
Gonzalez Velasco, Miguel ;
Moreno Vazquez, Jose C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (03) :515-524
[4]   The HoloLens in medicine: A systematic review and taxonomy [J].
Gsaxner, Christina ;
Li, Jianning ;
Pepe, Antonio ;
Jin, Yuan ;
Kleesiek, Jens ;
Schmalstieg, Dieter ;
Egger, Jan .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2023, 85
[5]   Evaluation of the 3D Augmented Reality-Guided Intraoperative Positioning of Dental Implants in Edentulous Mandibular Models [J].
Jiang, Weipeng ;
Ma, Longfei ;
Zhang, Boyu ;
Fan, Yingwei ;
Qu, Xiaofeng ;
Zhang, Xinran ;
Liao, Hongen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (06) :1219-1228
[6]   The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Kaewsiri, Dechawat ;
Panmekiate, Soontra ;
Subbalekha, Keskanya ;
Mattheos, Nikos ;
Pimkhaokham, Atiphan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (06) :505-514
[7]   Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study [J].
Kivovics, Marton ;
Takacs, Anna ;
Penzes, Dorottya ;
Nemeth, Orsolya ;
Mijiritsky, Eitan .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 119
[8]   A Novel Dental Implant Guided Surgery Based on Integration of Surgical Template and Augmented Reality [J].
Lin, Yen-Kun ;
Yau, Hong-Tzong ;
Wang, I-Chung ;
Zheng, Cheng ;
Chung, Kwok-Hung .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (03) :543-553
[9]   A mixed reality-based navigation method for dental implant navigation method: A pilot study [J].
Liu, Lin ;
Wang, Xiaoyu ;
Guan, Miaosheng ;
Fan, Yiping ;
Yang, Zhongliang ;
Li, Deyu ;
Bai, Yuming ;
Li, Hongbo .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2023, 154
[10]   A review on the applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery [J].
Lungu, Abel J. ;
Swinkels, Wout ;
Claesen, Luc ;
Tu, Puxun ;
Egger, Jan ;
Chen, Xiaojun .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2021, 18 (01) :47-61