Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation: An in vitro study

被引:9
|
作者
Tao, Baoxin [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Xingqi [3 ]
Wang, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xiaojun [3 ,5 ]
Shen, Yihan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wu, Yiqun [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Dent Ctr 2, Sch Med,Coll Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Res Inst Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Biomed Mfg & Life Qual Engn, Sch Mech Engn, State Key Lab Mech Syst & Vibrat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Coll Stomatol,Dept Dent Ctr 2, 280 Mohe Rd, Shanghai 201999, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Surgery; Computer-assisted; Augmented reality; Dental implants; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Augmented reality has been gradually applied in dental implant surgery. However, whether the dynamic navigation system integrated with augmented reality technology will further improve the accuracy is still unknown. The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic navigation and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation systems. Materials and methods: Thirty-two cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans from clinical patients were collected and used to generate 64 phantoms that were allocated to the augmented reality based dynamic navigation (ARDN) group or the conventional dynamic navigation (DN) group. The primary outcomes were global coronal, apical and angular deviations, and they were measured after image fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was used. A P value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: A total of 242 dental implants were placed in two groups. The global coronal, apical and angular deviations of the ARDN and DN groups were 1.31 +/- 0.67 mm vs. 1.18 +/- 0.59 mm, 1.36 +/- 0.67 mm vs. 1.39 +/- 0.55 mm, and 3.72 +/- 2.13(degrees) vs. 3.1 +/- 1.56(degrees), respectively. No significant differences were found with regard to coronal and apical deviations (P = 0.16 and 0.6, respectively), but the DN group had a significantly lower angular deviation than the ARDN group (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The augmented reality-based dynamic navigation system yielded a similar accuracy to the conventional dynamic navigation system for dental implant placement in coronal and apical points, but the augmented reality-based dynamic navigation system yielded a higher angular deviation. 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 202
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implant placement using mixed reality-based dynamic navigation: A proof of concept
    Shusterman, Ariel
    Nashef, Rizan
    Tecco, Simona
    Mangano, Carlo
    Mangano, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 149
  • [2] Accuracy of dental implant placement using different dynamic navigation and robotic systems: an in vitro study
    Xu, Zonghe
    Zhou, Lin
    Han, Bin
    Wu, Shuang
    Xiao, Yanjun
    Zhang, Sihui
    Chen, Jiang
    Guo, Jianbin
    Wu, Dong
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [3] Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study
    Ma, Feifei
    Sun, Feng
    Wei, Tai
    Ma, Yu
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03) : 352 - 360
  • [4] Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement
    Wu, Yiqun
    Tao, Baoxin
    Lan, Kengliang
    Shen, Yihan
    Huang, Wei
    Wang, Feng
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (04) : 362 - 376
  • [5] In Vitro Comparison of Time and Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Trephine and Conventional Drilling Techniques Under Dynamic Navigation
    Deeb, Janina Golob
    Frantar, Anja
    Deeb, George R.
    Carrico, Caroline K.
    Rener-Sitar, Ksenija
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 47 (03) : 199 - 204
  • [6] Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement
    Wu, Dong
    Zhou, Lin
    Yang, Jin
    Zhang, Bao
    Lin, Yanjun
    Chen, Jiang
    Huang, Wenxiu
    Chen, Yonghui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [7] Accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach in dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study
    Pei, Xiyan
    Weng, Jinlong
    Sun, Feng
    Ma, Yu
    Iao, Siniong
    Liu, Xiaoqiang
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [8] Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation
    Block, Michael S.
    Emery, Robert W.
    Lank, Kathryn
    Ryan, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [9] Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Using Task-Autonomous Robotic System or Dynamic Navigation: An In Vitro Study
    Chen, Jinyan
    Tao, Baoxin
    Yu, Xinbo
    Wu, Yiqun
    Wang, Feng
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025, 36 (02) : 178 - 190
  • [10] Accuracy of dental implant placement with or without the use of a dynamic navigation assisted system: A randomized clinical trial
    Jorba-Garcia, Adria
    Bara-Casaus, Jose Javier
    Camps-Font, Octavi
    Sanchez-Garces, Maria angeles
    Figueiredo, Rui
    Valmaseda-Castellon, Eduard
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (05) : 438 - 449