Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation: An in vitro study

被引:9
|
作者
Tao, Baoxin [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Xingqi [3 ]
Wang, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xiaojun [3 ,5 ]
Shen, Yihan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wu, Yiqun [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Dent Ctr 2, Sch Med,Coll Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Res Inst Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Biomed Mfg & Life Qual Engn, Sch Mech Engn, State Key Lab Mech Syst & Vibrat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Coll Stomatol,Dept Dent Ctr 2, 280 Mohe Rd, Shanghai 201999, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Surgery; Computer-assisted; Augmented reality; Dental implants; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Augmented reality has been gradually applied in dental implant surgery. However, whether the dynamic navigation system integrated with augmented reality technology will further improve the accuracy is still unknown. The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic navigation and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation systems. Materials and methods: Thirty-two cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans from clinical patients were collected and used to generate 64 phantoms that were allocated to the augmented reality based dynamic navigation (ARDN) group or the conventional dynamic navigation (DN) group. The primary outcomes were global coronal, apical and angular deviations, and they were measured after image fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was used. A P value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: A total of 242 dental implants were placed in two groups. The global coronal, apical and angular deviations of the ARDN and DN groups were 1.31 +/- 0.67 mm vs. 1.18 +/- 0.59 mm, 1.36 +/- 0.67 mm vs. 1.39 +/- 0.55 mm, and 3.72 +/- 2.13(degrees) vs. 3.1 +/- 1.56(degrees), respectively. No significant differences were found with regard to coronal and apical deviations (P = 0.16 and 0.6, respectively), but the DN group had a significantly lower angular deviation than the ARDN group (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The augmented reality-based dynamic navigation system yielded a similar accuracy to the conventional dynamic navigation system for dental implant placement in coronal and apical points, but the augmented reality-based dynamic navigation system yielded a higher angular deviation. 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 202
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study
    Kivovics, Marton
    Takacs, Anna
    Penzes, Dorottya
    Nemeth, Orsolya
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 119
  • [2] Implant placement using mixed reality-based dynamic navigation: A proof of concept
    Shusterman, Ariel
    Nashef, Rizan
    Tecco, Simona
    Mangano, Carlo
    Mangano, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 149
  • [3] Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study
    Shusterman, Ariel
    Nashef, Rizan
    Tecco, Simona
    Mangano, Carlo
    Lerner, Henriette
    Mangano, Francesco Guido
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [4] Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation
    Block, Michael S.
    Emery, Robert W.
    Lank, Kathryn
    Ryan, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [5] Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study
    Tao, Baoxin
    Feng, Yuan
    Fan, Xingqi
    Zhuang, Minjie
    Chen, Xiaojun
    Wang, Feng
    Wu, Yiqun
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 123
  • [6] Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation
    Emery, Robert W.
    Merritt, Scott A.
    Lank, Kathryn
    Gibbs, Jason D.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2016, 42 (05) : 399 - 405
  • [7] Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement
    Pinter, Gabor Tamas
    Decker, Roland
    Szenasi, Gabor
    Barabas, Peter
    Huszar, Tamas
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2022, (187):
  • [8] Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted systems: an in vitro study
    Zhou, Miao
    Zhou, Hui
    Li, Shu-Yi
    Zhu, Yi-Bo
    Geng, Yuan-Ming
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 122 (04) : 343 - 348
  • [9] Accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach in dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study
    Pei, Xiyan
    Weng, Jinlong
    Sun, Feng
    Ma, Yu
    Iao, Siniong
    Liu, Xiaoqiang
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [10] Accuracy of dental implant placement using different dynamic navigation and robotic systems: an in vitro study (vol 7, 182, 2024)
    Xu, Zonghe
    Zhou, Lin
    Han, Bin
    Wu, Shuang
    Xiao, Yanjun
    Zhang, Sihui
    Chen, Jiang
    Guo, Jianbin
    Wu, Dong
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01):