The Clinical Influence of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Patients With Gastric Cancer Who Receive Curative Treatment

被引:6
作者
Aoyama, Toru [1 ,2 ]
Maezawa, Yukio [1 ,2 ]
Hashimoto, Itaru [1 ,2 ]
Hara, Kentaro [1 ,3 ]
Kazama, Keisuke [1 ]
Numata, Masakatsu [1 ]
Sawazaki, Sho [1 ]
Tamagawa, Hiroshi [1 ]
Tamagawa, Ayako [1 ]
Nakazono, Masato [1 ]
Segami, Kenki [1 ]
Cho, Haruhiko [1 ,3 ]
Tateishi, Minori [1 ]
Minami, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Nagasawa, Shinsuke [1 ]
Komori, Keisuke [1 ]
Kato, Aya [1 ]
Otani, Kazuki [1 ]
Kawahara, Shinnosuke [1 ]
Oshima, Takashi [1 ,3 ]
Yukawa, Norio [1 ]
Saito, Aya [1 ]
Rino, Yasushi [1 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Surg, Yokohama, Japan
[2] Kanagawa Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Yokohama, Japan
[3] Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr Komagome, Dept Surg, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index; GNRI; gastric cancer; curative treatment; perioperative aduvant treatment; SURVIVAL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.21873/anticanres.16763
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Aim: We evaluated the clinical impact of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in patients who received curative treatment and perioperative adjuvant treatment. We also investigated the association between the GNRI and the clinicopathological features of patients with GC. Patients and Methods: This study included 280 patients who underwent curative treatment for GC between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters of the high-GNRI and low-GNRI groups were compared. Results: In the GNRI-high group, the overall survival (OS) rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were significantly lower (82.7% and 77.9%, respectively) than those in the GNRI-low group (56.4% and 40.8%). The GNRI was selected for the final multivariate analysis model for OS. The GNRI was also a significant prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The RFS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 79.1% and 74.8%, respectively, in the GNRI-high group, and 48.0% and 38.6% in the GNRI-low group. The GNRI was selected for the final multivariate analysis model for RFS. The GNRI was also found to affect the postoperative clinical course, including postoperative surgical complications and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion: The GNRI may be a promising prognostic and predictive factor for gastric cancer. In the future, the GNRI may be used to select optimal treatment strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:5605 / 5611
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2022
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    D'Amico, Thomas A.
    Bentrem, David J.
    Chao, Joseph
    Cooke, David
    Corvera, Carlos
    Das, Prajnan
    Enzinger, Peter C.
    Enzler, Thomas
    Fanta, Paul
    Farjah, Farhood
    Gerdes, Hans
    Gibson, Michael K.
    Hochwald, Steven
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Ilson, David H.
    Keswani, Rajesh N.
    Kim, Sunnie
    Kleinberg, Lawrence R.
    Klempner, Samuel J.
    Lacy, Jill
    Ly, Quan P.
    Matkowskyj, Kristina A.
    McNamara, Michael
    Mulcahy, Mary F.
    Outlaw, Darryl
    Park, Haeseong
    Perry, Kyle A.
    Pimiento, Jose
    Poultsides, George A.
    Reznik, Scott
    Roses, Robert E.
    Strong, Vivian E.
    Su, Stacey
    Wang, Hanlin L.
    Wiesner, Georgia
    Willett, Christopher G.
    Yakoub, Danny
    Yoon, Harry
    McMillian, Nicole
    Pluchino, Lenora A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2022, 20 (02): : 167 - 192
  • [2] Comparison of the Clinical Value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Prognostic Nutritional Index as Determinants of Survival Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer
    An, Soomin
    Eo, Wankyu
    Lee, Sookyung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 13 (12): : 3348 - 3357
  • [3] Usefulness of Nutrition and Inflammation Assessment Tools in Esophageal Cancer Treatment
    Aoyama, Toru
    Kazama, Keisuke
    Maezawa, Yukio
    Hara, Kentaro
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2023, 37 (01): : 22 - 35
  • [4] Clinical Impact of Nutrition and Inflammation Assessment Tools in Gastric Cancer Treatment
    Aoyama, Toru
    Hara, Kentaro
    Kazama, Keisuke
    Maezawa, Yukio
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (11) : 5167 - 5180
  • [5] Perioperative body composition changes in the multimodal treatment of gastrointestinal cancer
    Aoyama, Toru
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2020, 50 (03) : 217 - 222
  • [6] Aoyama T, 2015, ANTICANCER RES, V35, P2401
  • [7] Furuke Hirotaka, 2021, Cancer Diagn Progn, V1, P43, DOI 10.21873/cdp.10007
  • [8] The value of the systematic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with gastric cancer: A literature review
    Gao, Yongyin
    Huang, Dingzhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 10 (04) : 799 - 804
  • [9] Prognostic and clinicopathological value of the geriatric nutritional risk index in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of 5,834 patients
    He, Liang
    Li, Ying
    Qu, Linlin
    Zhang, Fan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9
  • [10] Hirahara Noriyuki, 2020, Oncotarget, V11, P2345, DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.27635