The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices

被引:2
作者
Socha, Maciej W. [1 ,2 ]
Flis, Wojciech [1 ,2 ]
Wartega, Mateusz [3 ]
Stankiewicz, Martyna [1 ]
Kunicka, Aleksandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Perinatol Gynecol & Gynecol Oncol, Coll Medicum Bydgoszcz, Lukasiewicza 1, PL-85821 Bydgoszcz, Poland
[2] St Adalberts Hosp Gdansk, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Copernicus Healthcare Ent, Jana Pawla 250, PL-80462 Gdansk, Poland
[3] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Pathophysiol, Coll Medicum Bydgoszcz, M Curie Sklodowskiej 9, PL-85094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
关键词
labor induction; perinatology; cervical ripening; delivery; TERM PREGNANCY; NITRIC-OXIDE; DINOPROSTONE; MANAGEMENT; PAIN; ANALGESIA; BIRTH;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12124106
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a misoprostol vaginal insert as an induction-of-labor (IOL) agent in women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 2) in achieving vaginal delivery (VD) within 48 h, depending on the gestational week, with particular emphasis on the cesarean section (CS) percentage, intrapartum analgesia application and possible side effects, such as tachysystole ratio. Methods: In this retrospective observational study involving 6000 screened pregnant patients, 190 women (3%) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria and underwent vaginal misoprostol IOL. The pregnant women were collected into three groups: patients who delivered at up to 37 weeks of gestation (<37 Group)-42 patients; patients who delivered between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation (37-41 Group)-76 patients; and patients who delivered after 41 weeks of gestation (41+ Group)-72 patients. The outcomes included time to delivery and mode of delivery, rate of tachysystole, need for intrapartum analgesia, and need for oxytocin augmentation. Results: Most of the patients delivered vaginally (54.8% in <37 Group vs. 57.9% in 37-41 Group vs. 61.1% in 41+ Group). A total of 89.5% (170/190) of patients delivered within 48 h (<37 Group-78.6% vs. 37-41 Group-89.5% vs. 41+ Group-95.8%). Statistical significance was demonstrated for the increased rate of vaginal deliveries and shortened time to delivery in the 41+ weeks group (p = 0.0026 and p = 0.0038). The indications for cesarean section were as follows: abnormal CTG pattern vs. lack of labor progression: 42.1% vs. 57.9% in <37 Group, 59.4% vs. 40.6% in 37-41 Group and 71.4% vs. 28.6% in 41+ Group. Statistical significance was demonstrated for the increased rate of abnormal CTG patterns as cesarean section indications in the 41+ Group (p = 0.0019). The need for oxytocin augmentation in each group was: 35.7% in <37 Group vs. 19.7% in 37-41 Group vs. 11.1% in 41+ Group. Statistical significance was shown for decreased need for oxytocin augmentation in +41 Group (p = 0.0016). The need for intrapartum anesthesia, depending on the group, was: 78.6% in <37 Group vs. 82.9% in 37-41 Group vs. 83.3% in 41+ Group. Statistical significance was demonstrated for increased need for intrapartum anesthesia application during labor in +41 Group (p = 0.0018). The prevalence of hyperstimulation was similar in all three groups (4.8% vs. 7.9% vs. 5.6% p > 0.05). Conclusions: The misoprostol vaginal regimen for IOL used in our study is effective in achieving vaginal delivery within 48 h. In post-term women, the use of this regimen is characterized by an increased rate of vaginal deliveries, a shorter time to delivery and a lower need for oxytocin.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Acharya T, 2017, SAGE OPEN MED, V5, DOI 10.1177/2050312117700809
[2]   Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Alfirevic, Zarko ;
Keeney, Edna ;
Dowswell, Therese ;
Welton, Nicky J. ;
Dias, Sofia ;
Jones, Leanne V. ;
Navaratnam, Kate ;
Caldwell, Deborah M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
[3]   Oral misoprostol for induction of labour [J].
Alfirevic, Zarko ;
Aflaifel, Nasreen ;
Weeks, Andrew .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (06)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V114, P386, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5
[5]   Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis [J].
Austin, S. Campbell ;
Sanchez-Ramos, Luis ;
Adair, C. David .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (06) :624.e1-624.e9
[6]   The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach [J].
Bakker, Ronan ;
Pierce, Stephanie ;
Myers, Dean .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 296 (02) :167-179
[7]  
Bebbington M, 2003, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V189, pS211, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.565
[8]   Analgesic efficacy of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus combined spinal-epidural technique in multiparous women during labour [J].
Blajic, Iva ;
Zagar, Tea ;
Semrl, Neli ;
Umek, Nejc ;
Lucovnik, Miha ;
Pintaric, Tatjana Stopar .
GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2021, 92 (11) :797-803
[9]   Polish Gynecological Society recommendations for labor induction [J].
Bomba-Opon, Dorota ;
Drews, Krzysztof ;
Huras, Huber ;
Laudanski, Piotr ;
Paszkowski, Tomasz ;
Wielgos, Miroslaw .
GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 88 (04) :224-234
[10]  
Chatsis V, 2018, Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labour: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines Internet