Chili Pepper Farmers' Pesticide Use and Residues under Thailand's Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard: A Case Study in Chiang Mai Province

被引:1
|
作者
Amekawa, Yuichiro [1 ]
Hongsibsong, Surat [2 ,3 ]
Sawarng, Nootchakarn [3 ,4 ]
Gebre, Girma Gezimu [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ritsumeikan Univ, Coll Int Relat, Kyoto 6038577, Japan
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Res Inst Hlth Sci, Sch Hlth Sci Res, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Res Inst Hlth Sci, Environm Occupat Hlth Sci & Noncommunicable Dis Ct, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[4] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Community Med, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[5] Hawassa Univ, Fac Environm Gender & Dev Studies, Dept Agribusiness & Value Chain Management, Hawassa 05, Ethiopia
[6] Ritsumeikan Univ, Japan Soc Promot Sci JSPS Postdoctoral Res Fellows, Kyoto 6038577, Japan
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 05期
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
public GAP standard; Q-GAP; pesticide use; pesticide residue; chili pepper; Thailand; ADOPTION; FRUIT; GAP;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture13051105
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This multi-level study focuses on Thailand's public good agricultural practices certification standard (Q-GAP) and compares the performance of 100 certified and 229 uncertified growers regarding their pesticide use practices and the levels of pesticide residues detected in on-farm samples. Chili pepper, a crop primarily marketed domestically, was the focal point of this study conducted in the production context of Chiang Mai province. The data for the study were collected through field interview surveys and chili pepper sample collections. The collected crop samples underwent organophosphate pesticide and synthetic pyrethroid analyses using gas chromatography. Statistical analysis techniques, including one-way ANOVA, chi-square tests, probit regression, and multiple linear regression, were employed to analyze the numerical data using the Stata software. The study's findings revealed several key points. The certified farmers' main motivation for adopting Q-GAP was to meet market requirements, rather than ensuring safety assurance. They exhibited a significantly lower adoption of insecticides compared to the uncertified farmers, but no significant differences were observed for fungicide or herbicide adoption. The analysis of the pesticide residue results yielded mixed findings, making it challenging to conclude whether certified farmers have better control over pesticide residues compared to uncertified farmers. A probit regression analysis highlighted the critical importance of training for growers' adoption of the standard.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Producers' Perceptions of Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard and Their Pesticide Use: The Case of Q-GAP for Cabbage Farming in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand
    Amekawa, Yuichiro
    Hongsibsong, Surat
    Sawarng, Nootchakarn
    Yadoung, Sumeth
    Gebre, Girma Gezimu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [2] Pesticide Use under Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard: A Comparative Study in Thailand
    Amekawa, Yuichiro
    Bumrungsri, Sara
    Wayo, Kanuengnit
    Gebre, Girma Gezimu
    Hongsibsong, Surat
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [3] Adoption and continued participation in a public Good Agricultural Practices program: The case of rice farmers in the Central Plains of Thailand
    Srisopaporn, Saengabha
    Jourdain, Damien
    Perret, Sylvain R.
    Shivakoti, Ganesh
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 96 : 242 - 253