Portable X-ray fluorescence for autonomous in-situ characterization of chloride in oil and gas waste

被引:1
作者
Nava, Valeria [1 ]
Sihota, Natasha [2 ]
Hoelen, Thomas [2 ]
Johnson, Aaron [1 ]
Lowry, Gregory, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Chevron Energy Technol Co, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Autonomous sensing; Salinity; Oil and gas waste; Xray fluorescence; Portable XRF; XRF; CONTAMINATION; SOILS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120558
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil salinization resulting from anthropogenic activities affects soil health and productivity. Methods that can provide rapid, inexpensive, and accurate salinity characterization over vast areas of soil and waste materials will help in managing their impacts. The objective of this work was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of portable X-ray Fluorescence (pXRF) Cl- measurements of highly saline waste material (WMs) from oil and gas production sites. We compared pXRF Cl- measurements of three unconsolidated WMs to a standard laboratory method for determining soil salinity and identified the WM properties that most affect the precision and accuracy of the pXRF Cl- measurement. Despite covering a range of several orders of magnitude in chloride concentration, calibrated pXRF measurements varied by no more than 14% compared to standard laboratory Cl- measurements for dry homogenous samples. Measurements taken of WMs that were not homogenized decreased pXRF accuracy by 75% while moisture content decreased accuracy by 15%. Field measurements made at different areas inside an oil and gas WM pit were accurate within 60% of the standard laboratory Cl- measurements, despite the samples having a wide range of moisture content and particle size distributions. This study indicates that pXRF can be used to rapidly characterize soil salinity in-situ with acceptable accuracy and precision for screening purposes, opening the door for automated robotic measurements of chloride over large areas.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Combination of proximal and remote sensing methods for rapid soil salinity quantification
    Aldabaa, Abdalsamad Abdalsatar Ali
    Weindorf, David C.
    Chakraborty, Somsubhra
    Sharma, Aakriti
    Li, Bin
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2015, 239 : 34 - 46
  • [2] Allbed A., 2013, Advances in Remote Sensing, 02, P373, DOI 10.4236/ars.2013.24040
  • [3] Monitoring metal pollution in soils using portable-XRF and conventional laboratory-based techniques: Evaluation of the performance and limitations according to metal properties and sources
    Caporale, Antonio G.
    Adamo, Paola
    Capozzi, Fiore
    Langella, Giuliano
    Terribile, Fabio
    Vingiani, Simona
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 643 : 516 - 526
  • [4] Use of a Handheld X-ray Fluorescence Analyser to Quantify Chloride Ions In Situ: A Case Study of Structural Repair
    Chinchon-Paya, Servando
    Torres Martin, Julio E.
    Rebolledo Ramos, Nuria
    Sanchez Montero, Javier
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (03) : 1 - 11
  • [5] Climate Prediction Center, MONTHL US SOIL MOIST
  • [6] Evaluating the utility of elemental measurements obtained from factory-calibrated field-portable X-Ray fluorescence units for aquatic sediments
    Dunnington, Dewey W.
    Spooner, Ian S.
    Mallory, Mark L.
    White, Chris E.
    Gagnon, Graham A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 249 : 45 - 53
  • [7] Eva M., 2013, XRAY FLUORESCENCE SP
  • [8] Influence of and correction for moisture in rocks, soils and sediments on in situ XRF analysis
    Ge, LQ
    Lai, WC
    Lin, YC
    [J]. X-RAY SPECTROMETRY, 2005, 34 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [9] Potential of integrated field spectroscopy and spatial analysis for enhanced assessment of soil contamination: A prospective review
    Horta, A.
    Malone, B.
    Stockmann, U.
    Minasny, B.
    Bishop, T. F. A.
    McBratney, A. B.
    Pallasser, R.
    Pozza, L.
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2015, 241 : 180 - 209
  • [10] Field portable XRF analysis of environmental samples
    Kalnicky, DJ
    Singhvi, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2001, 83 (1-2) : 93 - 122