Risk assessment method in relation to coal mine gas explosion based on safety information loss

被引:0
|
作者
Guo, Huimin [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Lianhua [1 ]
Li, Shugang [1 ]
Jiang, Bolin [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Safety Sci & Engn, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Safety Sci & Engn, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
combinatorial weighting; gas explosion; risk assessment; safety information loss; unascertained measure theory; CHINA;
D O I
10.1002/prs.12601
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Considering the uncertainty and fuzziness of the risk assessment index of coal mine gas explosion, a risk assessment model of gas explosion based on combinatorial weighting-unascertained measure of safety information loss is proposed. First, 20 risk indicators are extracted from the six aspects of supply loss, transformation loss, transmission loss, perceived loss, cognition loss, and response loss in the process of safety information flow. The weight vector is constructed by the G1 method and anti-entropy weight combination weighting method. Then, the single-index measurement function is used to process the risk index measure. Based on the classification standard of the gas explosion risk assessment index, the single-index and multi-index measurement matrices are constructed. And the grade is judged according to the principle of maximum membership. Finally, a mine is selected for case application. The results show that the evaluation results are consistent with the actual situation and the method has certain feasibility. It provides a new idea and method for advanced control and accident prevention of coal mine gas explosion risk.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 658
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk assessment model of gas explosion in coal mine based on the hazard theory
    Cao, Shu-Gang
    Wang, Yan-Ping
    Liu, Yan-Bao
    Xu, A-Meng
    Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society, 2006, 31 (04): : 470 - 474
  • [2] Safety Assessment Model of Gas Explosion Hazard in Coal Mine Based on Wavelet Neural Network
    Tian Shuicheng
    Zhao Huajie
    PROGRESS IN SAFETY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2009, : 324 - 328
  • [3] Research and application of safety assessment method of gas explosion accident in coal mine based on GRA-ANP-FCE
    Nian Qifeng
    Shi Shiliang
    Li Runqiu
    2012 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 45 : 106 - 111
  • [4] The Disaster Risk Assessment of Coal Mine Gas Explosion Based on the Model of SVM Classification - Regression
    Xue, Ye
    Zhang, Taotao
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2014, 102 : 322 - 327
  • [5] Risk assessment of coal mine gas explosion based on cloud integrated similarity and fuzzy DEMATEL
    Xu, Kun
    Li, Shuang
    Lu, Cheng
    Liu, Jiao
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2023, 177 : 1211 - 1224
  • [6] Risk assessment of mine safety equipment - Gas measurement system in a coal mine
    Tanaka, A
    Komai, T
    Noda, K
    Nakagawa, Y
    Sagisaka, M
    Kishimoto, A
    Jinguji, M
    Kosugi, M
    Kunimatsu, S
    Isei, T
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 2025 - 2030
  • [7] Sound Recognition Method of Coal Mine Gas and Coal Dust Explosion Based on GoogLeNet
    Yu, Xingchen
    Li, Xiaowei
    ENTROPY, 2023, 25 (03)
  • [8] Recognition method of coal mine gas and coal dust explosion based on sound characteristics
    Sun, Jiping
    Yu, Xingchen
    Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2022, 51 (06): : 1096 - 1105
  • [9] Quantitative risk assessment of coal mine gas explosion based on a Bayesian network and computational fluid dynamics
    Wu, Zelin
    Li, Yuntao
    Jing, Qi
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2024, 190 : 780 - 793
  • [10] A risk assessment method to quantitatively investigate the methane explosion in underground coal mine
    Shi, Long
    Wang, Jinhui
    Zhang, Guomin
    Cheng, Xudong
    Zhao, Xianbo
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2017, 107 : 317 - 333