Supporting women's empowerment by changing intra-household decision-making: A mixed-methods analysis of a field experiment in rural south-west Tanzania

被引:3
作者
Lecoutere, Els [1 ,2 ]
Chu, Lan [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Livestock Res Inst, CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Univ Antwerp, Inst Dev Policy, Antwerp, Belgium
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
agricultural households; field experiment; intra-household decision-making; mixed methods; Tanzania; women's empowerment; LAND RIGHTS; GENDER; AGRICULTURE; AUTHORITY; NUTRITION; FARMERS; AGENCY; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/dpr.12758
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Motivation: In rural sub-Saharan Africa, patriarchal social norms and customs often lead to unequal resource access, decision-making power, and intra-household power relations between women and men co-heads of smallholder farm households. Household methodologies are gender-transformative approaches that aim to achieve gender equality and empower women by improving intra-household gender relations. Evidence of the impact of such approaches on women's empowerment is still scarce. Purpose: We assess the effects of a programme that introduces participatory intra-household decision-making to challenge gender relations within households on women's empowerment. The programme was delivered to monogamous couples who head smallholder coffee-farming households in rural south-west Tanzania. Methods and approach: We combine (quasi-)experimental quantitative and qualitative methods to assess the programme's impact on women's empowerment and how that impact fits with women's valued domains of empowerment and individual pathways to empowerment. Findings: Awareness-raising couple seminars, the programme's least intensive intervention, increased women's access to livestock. Intensive coaching in participatory decision-making increased women's control over household coffee income-a priority for women. Couple seminars increased women's highly valued involvement in strategic farm decisions-intensive coaching increased it further. Access to personal income, however, valued by women for independent decision-making for their households' wellbeing, did not change. Policy implications: Gender-transformative approaches that challenge domestic gender relations can increase women's access to household income and resources, and increase their participation in farming decisions. Such approaches need to be complemented by interventions to increase women's human capital, knowledge of enterprises, and personal resources. Catering for women's diverse pathways towards empowerment may increase their effectiveness. Challenging deep gender norms requires long-term engagement and trust between change agents and communities.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] What does it Mean to Make a 'Joint' Decision? Unpacking Intra-household Decision Making in Agriculture: Implications for Policy and Practice
    Acosta, Mariola
    van Wessel, Margit
    van Bommel, Severine
    Ampaire, Edidah L.
    Twyman, Jennifer
    Jassogne, Laurence
    Feindt, Peter H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2020, 56 (06) : 1210 - 1229
  • [2] Agarwal B., 1997, FEMINIST EC, V3, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/135457097338799, 10.1080/135457097338799]
  • [3] Alsop R., 2005, Empowerment in Practice, P1, DOI DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-6450-5
  • [4] He Says, She Says: Spousal Disagreement in Survey Measures of Bargaining Power
    Ambler, Kate
    Doss, Cheryl
    Kieran, Caitlin
    Passarelli, Simone
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2021, 69 (02) : 765 - 788
  • [5] Husband and Wife Perspectives on Farm Household Decision-making Authority and Evidence on Intra-household Accord in Rural Tanzania
    Anderson, C. Leigh
    Reynolds, Travis W.
    Gugerty, Mary Kay
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 90 : 169 - 183
  • [6] Anderson J., 2016, NATL SURVEY SEGMENTA
  • [7] Continuity and Change: Performing Gender in Rural Tanzania
    Badstue, Lone
    Farnworth, Cathy Rozel
    Umantseva, Anya
    Kamanzi, Adelbertus
    Roeven, Lara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2021, 57 (02) : 310 - 325
  • [8] A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries
    Banerjee, Abhijit
    Duflo, Esther
    Goldberg, Nathanael
    Karlan, Dean
    Osei, Robert
    Pariente, William
    Shapiro, Jeremy
    Thuysbaert, Bram
    Udry, Christopher
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6236)
  • [9] The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation
    Banerjee, Abhijit
    Duflo, Esther
    Glennerster, Rachel
    Kinnan, Cynthia
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2015, 7 (01) : 22 - 53
  • [10] The Power and Pitfalls of Experiments in Development Economics: Some Non-random Reflections
    Barrett, Christopher B.
    Carter, Michael R.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2010, 32 (04) : 515 - 548