Threats and the Public Constraint on Military Spending

被引:4
作者
DiGiuseppe, Matthew [1 ]
Aspide, Alessia [1 ]
Becker, Jordan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Polit Sci, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] United States Mil Acad West Point, Dept Social Sci, West Point, NY USA
[3] Brussels Sch Governance, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Chaire Econ Def Inst Hautes Etud Def Natl, Paris, France
关键词
NATO; military spending; survey experiment; fiscal policy; public opinion; UNITED-STATES; DEFENSE; OPINION; GUNS; POLITICS; BUTTER; PREFERENCES; DEMOCRACIES; PARTY; NATO;
D O I
10.1017/S0007123423000443
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The public places an important constraint on funding security in Europe, and austerity risks making the constraint tighter. Several recent studies show that curtailing military spending is a popular way to reduce debt in Europe. Yet it remains unclear if military spending aversion persists when threats are salient. We fielded an original survey experiment in Italy weeks before the Russian invasion of Ukraine to examine how information about security threats influences military spending preferences and fiscal trade-offs. We found that information about threats increases support for military spending. To validate the survey experiment, we recontacted and remeasured our respondent's preferences three weeks after Russia's invasion and find evidence consistent with our initial experiment. Our findings suggest that, while public opposition to military spending remains high in Italy, external threats dampen the public's opposition to military spending, even under high debt burdens.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 666
页数:18
相关论文
共 85 条
[51]   How rational is "the rational public"? Evidence from US public opinion on military spending [J].
Knopf, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1998, 42 (05) :544-571
[52]  
Lanzavecchia O, 2022, DECODE39
[53]  
Lute D, 2022, COMMUNICATION 0127
[54]   Bridging Partisan Divisions over Antiterrorism Policies: The Role of Threat Perceptions [J].
Malhotra, Neil ;
Popp, Elizabeth .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2012, 65 (01) :34-47
[55]  
Mattelaer A, 2018, DEFENCE STUDIES, V18, P339, DOI [10.1080/14702436.2018.1497446, DOI 10.1080/14702436.2018.1497446]
[56]  
Ministero Della Difesa, 2015, LIBR BIANC SIC INT D
[57]  
Mutz D., 2021, Advances in experimental political science
[59]  
NATO, 2013, METR 2013
[60]  
NATO, 2014, NATO