Diagnostic accuracy of ancillary tests for death by neurologic criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Briard, Joel Neves [1 ,2 ]
Nitulescu, Roy [2 ]
Lemoine, Emile [1 ]
Titova, Polina [2 ]
McIntyre, Lauralyn [3 ]
English, Shane W. [3 ,4 ]
Knoll, Greg [3 ]
Shemie, Sam D. [5 ]
Martin, Claudio [6 ]
Turgeon, Alexis F. [7 ,8 ]
Lauzier, Francois [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Fergusson, Dean A. [3 ]
Chasse, Michael [2 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Neurosci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Ctr Rech, 900 Rue St Denis, Montreal, PQ H2X 3H8, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Med, London, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Laval, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Div Crit Care Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[8] CHU Quebec Univ Laval Res Ctr, Populat Hlth & Optimal Hlth Pract Res Unit Trauma, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[9] Univ Laval, Dept Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[10] Univ Montreal, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE | 2023年 / 70卷 / 04期
关键词
ancillary test; brain death; death by neurologic criteria; meta-analysis; systematic review; BRAIN-DEATH; TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER; ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/s12630-023-02426-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
PurposeAncillary tests are frequently used in death determination by neurologic criteria (DNC), particularly when the clinical neurologic examination is unreliable. Nevertheless, their diagnostic accuracy has not been extensively studied. Our objective was to synthesize the sensitivity and specificity of commonly used ancillary tests for DNC.SourceWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and CINAHL Ebsco from their inception to 4 February 2022. We selected cohort and case-control studies including patients with 1) clinically diagnosed death by neurologic criteria or 2) clinically suspected death by neurologic criteria who underwent ancillary testing for DNC. We excluded studies without a priori diagnostic criteria and studies conducted solely on pediatric patients. Accepted reference standards were clinical examination, four-vessel conventional angiography, and radionuclide imaging. Data were directly extracted from published reports. We assessed the methodological quality of studies with the QUADAS-2 tool and estimated ancillary test sensitivities and specificities using hierarchical Bayesian models with diffuse priors.Principal findingsOverall, 137 records met the selection criteria. One study (0.7%) had a low risk of bias in all QUADAS-2 domains. Among clinically diagnosed death by neurologic criteria patients (n = 8,891), ancillary tests had similar pooled sensitivities (range, 0.82-0.93). Sensitivity heterogeneity was greater within (sigma = 0.10-0.15) than between (sigma = 0.04) ancillary test types. Among clinically suspected death by neurologic criteria patients (n = 2,732), pooled ancillary test sensitivities ranged between 0.81 and 1.00 and specificities between 0.87 and 1.00. Most estimates had high statistical uncertainty.ConclusionStudies assessing ancillary test diagnostic accuracy have an unclear or high risk of bias. High-quality studies are required to thoroughly validate ancillary tests for DNC.Study registrationPROSPERO (CRD42013005907); registered 7 October 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 748
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic Accuracy of Microbiome-Derived Biomarkers in Periodontitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dong, Anbo
    Proctor, Gordon
    Zaric, Svetislav
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [42] Diagnostic accuracy of the STRATIFY clinical prediction rule for falls: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Billington, Jennifer
    Fahey, Tom
    Galvin, Rose
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2012, 13
  • [43] Diagnostic accuracy of periostin in predicting asthma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Jia, Xinyu
    Li, Shan
    Xu, TingTing
    Ji, Ningfei
    Huang, Mao
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2021, 58 (03) : 307 - 315
  • [44] Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhange Yu
    Tianli Mao
    Yaping Xu
    Tengqi Li
    Yanhua Wang
    Fuqiang Gao
    Wei Sun
    Skeletal Radiology, 2018, 47 : 1587 - 1593
  • [45] Diagnostic test accuracy of the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jeong, Eunhye
    Park, Jinkyung
    Lee, Juneyoung
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (10) : 2510 - 2521
  • [46] Accuracy of molecular diagnostic assays for detection of Mycobacterium bovis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mabe, Lerato
    Muthevhuli, Mpho
    Thekisoe, Oriel
    Suleman, Essa
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2024, 226
  • [47] Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Fleuren, Lucas M.
    Klausch, Thomas L. T.
    Zwager, Charlotte L.
    Schoonmade, Linda J.
    Guo, Tingjie
    Roggeveen, Luca F.
    Swart, Eleonora L.
    Girbes, Armand R. J.
    Thoral, Patrick
    Ercole, Ari
    Hoogendoorn, Mark
    Elbers, Paul W. G.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 46 (03) : 383 - 400
  • [48] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting retinitis pigmentosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Musleh, Ayman Mohammed
    AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
    Abid, Mohammad Naim
    Salem, Yahia
    Hamila, Haitham Mounir
    Sallam, Ahmed B.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 69 (03) : 411 - 417
  • [49] Diagnostic accuracy of oral swab for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Fuzhen
    Wang, Yilin
    Zhang, Xuxia
    Liu, Kewei
    Shang, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Wei
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Li, Liang
    Pang, Yu
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 10
  • [50] Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Zhange
    Mao, Tianli
    Xu, Yaping
    Li, Tengqi
    Wang, Yanhua
    Gao, Fuqiang
    Sun, Wei
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (12) : 1587 - 1593