Team Adaptation to Discontinuous Task Change: Equity and Equality as Facilitators of Individual and Collective Task Capabilities Redevelopment

被引:7
作者
Li, Alex Ning [1 ]
Sherf, Elad N. [2 ]
Tangirala, Subrahmaniam [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas Christian Univ, Neeley Sch Business, Dept Management & Leadership, Ft Worth, TX 76129 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Org Behav Area, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Management & Org, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
team adaptation; resilience; task change; justice; temporal dynamics; equity; equality; ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; PAY DISPERSION; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; MANAGEMENT; COOPERATION; FAIRNESS; UNCERTAINTY; MULTILEVEL;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.2022.1621
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Teams often need to adapt to planned discontinuous task change or fundamental alteration of tasks, tools, and work systems. Although team adaptation theories have made substantive progress in explaining how teams can respond to change, they have not adequately considered the unique impact that discontinuous task change can have on teams. Such change can render not only collective but also individual task capabilities obsolete and necessitate a multilevel task relearning process. Drawing on the team compilation model, we suggest that adaptation to discontinuous task change is akin to team (re)development. We posit that teams are more effective when they approach discontinuous task change by first focusing on the rebuilding of individual task capabilities and only later shifting their attention to the rebuilding of team-level task capabilities. Moreover, we argue that the uncertainty caused by discontinuous task change makes reward fairness salient such that equity and equality in rewards are particularly useful in motivating members to (re)develop individual and collective task capabilities, respectively. We provide support for these arguments using survey, qualitative, and archival data from 115 manufacturing teams and discuss the implications of our findings for both research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1314
页数:29
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]   RESETTING THE CLOCK - THE DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE AND FAILURE [J].
AMBURGEY, TL ;
KELLY, D ;
BARNETT, WP .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1993, 38 (01) :51-73
[3]  
Anderson Brett R, 2020, Crit Care Explor, V2, pe0265, DOI 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000265
[4]  
Argote L., 1993, INT REV IND ORG PSYC, V8, P333
[5]  
Argyris Chris, 1978, Organizational Learning
[6]  
Arrow, 2020, SMALL GROUPS COMPLEX
[8]   Mixing Individual Incentives and Group Incentives: Best of Both Worlds or Social Dilemma? [J].
Barnes, Christopher M. ;
Hollenbeck, John R. ;
Jundt, Dustin K. ;
DeRue, D. Scott ;
Harmon, Stephen J. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 37 (06) :1611-1635
[9]   Considering Planned Change Anew: Stretching Large Group Interventions Strategically, Emotionally, and Meaningfully [J].
Bartunek, Jean M. ;
Balogun, Julia ;
Do, Boram .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2011, 5 :1-52
[10]   Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations [J].
Beal, DJ ;
Cohen, RR ;
Burke, MJ ;
McLendon, CL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (06) :989-1004