Outcomes of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy Using a Novel Hydrostatic Stylet Tissue Acquisition Technique

被引:1
|
作者
Magahis, Patrick T. [1 ]
Westerveld, Donevan [2 ]
Simons, Malorie [2 ]
Carr-Locke, David L. [1 ,2 ]
Sampath, Kartik [1 ,2 ]
Sharaiha, Reem Z. [1 ,2 ]
Mahadev, Srihari [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med Coll, MD Program, New York, NY USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, New York Presbyterian Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, New York, NY USA
[3] Weill Cornell Med, 1283 York Ave,9th Floor, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
endoscopic ultrasound; EUS-guided tissue acquisition; FNB; FNA; endoscopy; SOLID PANCREATIC LESIONS; DIAGNOSTIC YIELD; SLOW-PULL; 25-GAUGE NEEDLES; OPTIMAL NUMBER; TRUCUT BIOPSY; ASPIRATION; FNA; SUCTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0000000000001934
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is frequently used to obtain core samples of solid lesions. Here, we describe and evaluate a novel hydrostatic stylet (HS) technique designed to optimize core sample acquisition, reporting diagnostic yield, efficacy, and safety relative to the conventional stylet slow-pull (SP) technique. Methods: A novel HS technique was developed and validated retrospectively. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNB with core biopsy of solid lesions through either the HS or SP technique between January 2020 and April 2022 were included. Exclusion criteria included cystic lesions, nonlesional liver biopsies, and specimens sent for cytologic analysis only. Patient and lesion characteristics, number of passes, sample adequacy, and adverse events were compared between the two techniques. Results: A total of 272 patients were included with 138 in the HS group and 134 in the SP group. Lesion size and anatomic distribution were similar in both groups. Compared with the SP approach, the HS technique demonstrated significantly higher sample adequacy (97.8% vs 83.6%, P < 0.001), higher sensitivity (97.1% vs 89.7%, P = 0.03), and lower mean number of passes (1.2 vs 3.3, P < 0.001). Rates and severity of adverse events in the HS group were comparable to the SP group and existing literature. Similar associations were observed in pancreatic and nonpancreatic lesion subanalyses. Conclusions: The novel HS technique demonstrated excellent biopsy sample adequacy and diagnostic yield while requiring fewer passes to obtain diagnostic specimens compared with a conventional EUS-FNB approach. Further prospective evaluation is needed to confirm these pilot findings and optimize EUS-FNB acquisition techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 414
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy
    Sweeney, Jacob
    Soong, Lauren
    Goyal, Abha
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 48 (04) : 322 - 329
  • [2] A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy
    Li, Zhiwang
    Liu, Wei
    Xu, Xiaoda
    Li, Peiyu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 56 (08) : 668 - 678
  • [3] In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition
    Bang, Ji Young
    Kirtane, Sachin
    Krall, Konrad
    Navaneethan, Udayakumar
    Hasan, Muhammad
    Hawes, Robert
    Varadarajulu, Shyam
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 31 (02) : 197 - 202
  • [4] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: Equipment and technique
    Vilmann, Peter
    Saftoiu, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 21 (11) : 1646 - 1655
  • [5] Basic techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: Role of a stylet and suction
    Wani, Sachin
    ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND, 2014, 3 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [6] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy using a 20-gauge fine needle biopsy needle with the wet-heparinized suction technique
    Sisman, Gurhan
    Barbur, Erol
    Saka, Didem
    Piyade, Betul
    Besli, Sevval
    Boynukara, Can
    Kirimlioglu, Hale
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 32 (11) : 1470 - 1474
  • [7] Is contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy better than conventional fine needle biopsy? A retrospective study in a medical center
    Lai, Jian-Han
    Lin, Ching-Chung
    Lin, Hsiang-Hung
    Chen, Ming-Jen
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (08): : 6138 - 6143
  • [8] The efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in gallbladder masses
    Tong, Ting
    Tian, Li
    Deng, Min-Zi
    Chen, Xue-Jie
    Fu, Tian
    Ma, Ke-Jia
    Xu, Jia-Hao
    Wang, Xiao-Yan
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 22 (06) : 632 - 638
  • [9] High-Quality Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Tissue Acquisition
    Holt, Bronte A.
    Varadarajulu, Shyam
    Hebert-Magee, Shantel
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2014, 31 (07) : 696 - 707
  • [10] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition
    Varadarajulu, Shyam
    Hasan, Muhammad K.
    Bang, Ji Young
    Hebert-Magee, Shantel
    Hawes, Robert H.
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 26 : 62 - 69