A Method for Reconstruction of Size Distributions from 3D Drone Image Analysis: A Case Study

被引:3
|
作者
Segarra, Pablo [1 ]
Sanchidrian, Jose A. [1 ]
Potsch, Markus [2 ]
Iglesias, Luis [1 ]
Gomez, Santiago [1 ]
Gaich, Andreas [2 ]
Bernardini, Maurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, ETSI Minas & Energia, Rios Rosas 21, Madrid 28003, Spain
[2] 3GSM GmbH, Pluddemanngasse 77, Graz, Austria
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Rock blasting; Swebrec function; Ground sampling distance; Fragmentation-energy-fan; Delineation algorithms; Fines; FRAGMENTATION; ROCK;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-024-03765-1
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper describes a novel procedure to assess fragmentation from automatic analysis of 3D photogrammetric models with a commercial software. The muckpiles from 12 blasts were photographed with a conventional drone to build 3D photogrammetric models; the flights were made with a relatively constant ground sampling distance (GSD) of 6.2 sd 0.92 mm (mean and standard deviation, respectively). A comparison with already published mass-based size distributions from 11 of these blasts, shows a good performance of automatic 3D-fragmentation measurements in the coarse range (P >= 60%), while deviations between mass-based and 3D model fragmentation analysis grow towards the central-fines range. As a solution, the Swebrec function is fitted to the reliable part of the size distributions, well above the GSD, and then is extended towards the fines, down to a percentage passing of 5-10%. The suitable fitting range is obtained iteratively from the mass-based fragmentation data; the lower fragment size considered is independent of the model's resolution (i.e. GSD) with mean of 357 mm (equivalent to a passing in the range 66-86%, and well above the GSD of our models). The resulting distributions match properly mass-based size distributions with relative errors in percentile sizes of 15.5 sd 3.4%, and they can be represented with the simplest form of the fragmentation-energy-fan. As a guideline for reconstruction of size distributions and fines assessment when mass-based data is not available, the lower-fitting limit of 357 mm yields reasonable results (mean errors in pass in the range 5-36%) for the present case. The errors are limited enough to keep a sound description of the variation of fragmentation with change in blast design. 3D photogrammetric models are obtained from UAV flights over the muckpiles to assess fragmentation from blasting with a commercial software.The coarse fraction is reasonably well estimated through automatic analysis of 3D muckpile models.To correct deviations in the central-fines range, the Swebrec function is fitted to the coarse range (passings generally above 70%) and extrapolated to passing of 5-10%.The smaller fragment size considered for the fit is estimated for each blast from sieving data and it is independent of the model's resolution; the mean of these sizes (357 mm) procures a proper fines assessment for the present case.The reconstructed image-based size distributions match properly mass-based size distributions and are sensitive to changes in the powder factor in line with fragmentation-energy-fan principles.
引用
收藏
页码:4033 / 4050
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Method for Reconstruction of Size Distributions from 3D Drone Image Analysis: A Case Study
    Pablo Segarra
    José A. Sanchidrián
    Markus Pötsch
    Luis Iglesias
    Santiago Gómez
    Andreas Gaich
    Maurizio Bernardini
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2024, 57 : 4033 - 4050
  • [2] 3D cliff reconstruction by drone: An in-depth analysis of the image network
    Goncalves, Diogo
    Goncalves, Gil
    Perez-Alvarez, Juan Antonio
    Andriolo, Umberto
    MEASUREMENT, 2023, 222
  • [3] A Method of 3D Reconstruction from Image Sequence
    Li, Chuan
    Zheng, Jinjin
    Dang, Chuangyin
    Zhou, Hongjun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 2297 - 2301
  • [4] Multi-Drone 3D Building Reconstruction Method
    Filatov, Anton
    Zaslavskiy, Mark
    Krinkin, Kirill
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (23)
  • [5] The method of 3D image correction and the case study
    Nakata T.
    Kyokai Joho Imeji Zasshi/Journal of the Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, 2010, 64 (11): : 1557 - 1558
  • [6] 3D Reconstruction from Plenoptic Image
    Murgia, Francesca
    Giusto, Daniele
    Perra, Cristian
    2015 23RD TELECOMMUNICATIONS FORUM TELFOR (TELFOR), 2015, : 448 - 451
  • [7] 3D Reconstruction from Image Sequence
    Liu, Ji-zhong
    Zheng, En-tao
    Wang, Guang-hui
    Chen, Cai-ying
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE, MULTIMEDIA AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (SMCE 2015), 2015, : 117 - 122
  • [8] 3D Reconstruction from A Single Image
    Ping, Guiju
    Wang, Han
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE 2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBERNETICS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (CIS) ROBOTICS, AUTOMATION AND MECHATRONICS (RAM) (CIS & RAM 2019), 2019, : 47 - 52
  • [9] Aerial 3D Building Reconstruction from RGB Drone Imagery
    WuDunn, Marc
    Zakhor, Avideh
    Touzani, Samir
    Granderson, Jessica
    GEOSPATIAL INFORMATICS X, 2020, 11398
  • [10] 3D ultrasonic image reconstruction development and a new method of reconstruction
    Wang, YH
    Han, Y
    Cui, QS
    ISTM/2005: 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AND MEASUREMENT, VOLS 1-9, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 6275 - 6277