Development and Validation of an Evaluation Toolkit to Appraise eLearning Courses in Higher Education: A Pilot Study

被引:5
作者
Licen, Sabina [1 ]
Cassar, Maria [2 ]
Filomeno, Lucia [3 ]
Yeratziotis, Alexandros [4 ]
Prosen, Mirko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Primorska, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Polje 42, Izola 6310, Slovenia
[2] Tal Qroqq Univ Malta, Dept Nursing, Msida 2080, Malta
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Neurosci, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Cyprus, Dept Comp Sci, CY-1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
关键词
digital education standard; active learning; online learning; online teaching; higher education; validation;
D O I
10.3390/su15086361
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The development and evaluation of eLearning approaches is a global trend in higher education today. This study aimed to develop a companion evaluation toolkit consisting of formative and summative assessment scales to evaluate academics' experiences in designing, delivering, and evaluating eLearning. To test the psychometric properties of the companion evaluation toolkit, an instrument validation study was conducted. Items were created, then tested for content and face validity. A confirmatory factor analysis (n = 185 participants) for the summative assessment scale examined the underlying structure of the scale, while reliability was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The results show that the model examined is consistent with the 3 factors (33 items) explaining a total of 62% of the variance. The results also show a high level of reliability for both the formative and summative scales that comprise the companion evaluation toolkit. The results of this study can be used and welcomed by both teachers and professionals involved in the development and use of learning management systems or in the design, delivery, and evaluation of the eLearning process.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Afify Mohammed., 2018, Journal of Technology and Science Education, V8, P5, DOI DOI 10.3926/JOTSE.267
  • [2] Al-Fraihat D, 2017, PR INT CONF ELEARN, P247
  • [3] Comparing formative and summative simulation-based assessment in undergraduate nursing students: nursing competency acquisition and clinical simulation satisfaction
    Arrogante, Oscar
    Gonzalez-Romero, Gracia Maria
    Lopez-Torre, Eva Maria
    Carrion-Garcia, Laura
    Polo, Alberto
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [4] Basham R. E., 2009, HDB SOCIAL WORK RES, P51
  • [5] Bates A. W., 2015, Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning
  • [6] Cheawjindakarn B., 2013, Creative Education, V3, P61, DOI [10.4236/ce.2012.38b14, DOI 10.4236/CE.2012.38B014]
  • [7] Cleary Y., 2021, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, V51, P11, DOI [10.1177/0047281620977138, DOI 10.1177/0047281620977138]
  • [8] Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students' Perspective
    Coman, Claudiu
    Tiru, Laurentiu Gabriel
    Mesesan-Schmitz, Luiza
    Stanciu, Carmen
    Bularca, Maria Cristina
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) : 1 - 22
  • [9] The effects of video lecture viewing strategies on cognitive load
    Costley, Jamie
    Fanguy, Mik
    Lange, Chris
    Baldwin, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 33 (01) : 19 - 38
  • [10] Development of an Instructional Design Evaluation Survey for Postgraduate Medical E-Learning: Content Validation Study
    de Leeuw, Robert Adrianus
    Westerman, Michiel
    Walsh, Kieran
    Scheele, Fedde
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (08)