Does China's Case Falsify Modernization Theory? Interim Assessment

被引:3
作者
Cho, Sungmin [1 ]
机构
[1] Daniel K Inouye Asia Pacific Ctr Secur Studies APC, Honolulu, HI 96815 USA
关键词
VILLAGE ELECTIONS; DEMOCRACY; DEMOCRATIZATION; NATIONALISM; CAMPAIGN; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/10670564.2022.2163586
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
This study revisits the question of whether China's economic development has brought democratic changes within the country or not. While the modernization theory suggests that economic development should lead to democratization, scholars claim that China has not made democratic progress despite its economic growth. By comparing these two competing perspectives and examining the evidence behind each assessment, I argue that there has been a certain degree of democratic progress in China, in terms of increasing social aspirations for a more open and free society among the Chinese people. I explain why and how scholars reach different conclusions about democratic progress in China, and emphasize the importance of understanding discrepancies between (1) the lack of change in the state's system, (2) oscillation between liberal and illiberal policies, and (3) progressive changes in society. This article draws on previous studies and data from the World Value System, Varieties of Democracy, and Asian Barometer projects. It also discusses how Chinese people's local understanding of democracy affects the assessment of modernization theory's applicability in explaining China's case.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1052
页数:19
相关论文
共 120 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ZHONGGONG HANGZHOU S, P4
  • [2] [Anonymous], WASH POST
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, XINHUA NEWS 0920
  • [4] [Anonymous], GAPM IS INT TOOL DAT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, BBC NEWS 0310
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, CHINA DIALOGUE 1108
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, CHINA LABOUR B
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2018, CHINAFILE 0802
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2015, Polity Project
  • [10] [Anonymous], CHINESE WHITE PAPER